Re: [OMPI users] OMPI & uDAPL

2007-10-22 Thread Don Kerr
Couple of things. With linux I believe you need the interface instance in the 7th field of the /etc/dat.conf file. example: InfiniHost0 u1.1 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib64/libdapl.so ri.1.1 " " " " should be InfiniHost0 u1.1 nonthreadsafe default /usr/lib64/libdapl.so ri.1.1 "ib0 0 " " "

Re: [OMPI users] Pascal Interface for OpenMPI

2007-10-22 Thread Lourival Mendes
Thanks a lot for your comments Jeff.. I will try some of your advices.. and further I will let you know... in the mean time we can try at least to convince the old school of MPIers to include the Pascal interface... :) Best regards Lourival 2007/10/22, Jeff Squyres : > > On

Re: [OMPI users] Recursive use of "orterun"

2007-10-22 Thread Tim Prins
Hi Ides, Thanks for the report and reminder. I have filed a ticket on this (https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/1173) and you should receive email as it is updated. I do not know of any more elegant way to work around this at the moment. Thanks, Tim On Friday 19 October 2007 06:31:53

Re: [OMPI users] Syntax error in remote rsh execution

2007-10-22 Thread Tim Prins
Sorry to reply to my own mail. Just browsing through the logs you sent, and I see that 'hostname' should be working fine. However, you are using v1.1.5 which is very old. I would strongly suggest upgrading to v1.2.4. It is a huge improvement over the old v1.1 series (which is not being

Re: [OMPI users] Syntax error in remote rsh execution

2007-10-22 Thread Tim Prins
Hi Jorge, This is interesting. The problem is the universe name: root@(none):default-universe The "(none)" part is supposed to be the hostname where mpirun is executed. Try running: hostname and: uname -n These should both return valid hostnames for your machine. Open MPI pretty much assumes

Re: [OMPI users] Pascal Interface for OpenMPI

2007-10-22 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Oct 22, 2007, at 6:44 PM, Lourival Mendes wrote: Hy everybody, I'm interested in use the MPI on the Pascal environment. I tryed the MPICH2 list but no success. On the Free Pascal Compiler list, Daniël invited me to subscribe this list and open a discussion on the interface of OpenMPI for

[OMPI users] Pascal Interface for OpenMPI

2007-10-22 Thread Lourival Mendes
Hy everybody, I'm interested in use the MPI on the Pascal environment. I tryed the MPICH2 list but no success. On the Free Pascal Compiler list, Daniël invited me to subscribe this list and open a discussion on the interface of OpenMPI for Pascal. Probably as Daniël knows there is almost no

Re: [OMPI users] OMPI & uDAPL

2007-10-22 Thread Troy Telford
On Monday 22 October 2007, Troy Telford wrote: > WARNING: Failed to open "ib0" Whoops; I typed in the wrong text here. The failure was "Failed to Open "InfiniHost0" - ie. the name listed in the warning matches the name in /etc/dat.conf. -- Troy Telford

[OMPI users] OMPI & uDAPL

2007-10-22 Thread Troy Telford
OK, I've got a system set up so that it can use uDAPL over IB (! OFED, ! Mellanox, though) on Linux. Running simple dapl test programs (shamelessly pulled from the OFED tree) seems to verify that DAPL is in fact operating properly. After searching through the mail archives, I found a small

Re: [OMPI users] SLURM vs. Torque? [OT]

2007-10-22 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Monday 22 October 2007, Bill Johnstone wrote: > Hello All. > > We are starting to need resource/scheduling management for our small > cluster, and I was wondering if any of you could provide comments on > what you think about Torque vs. SLURM? On the basis of the appearance > of active

Re: [OMPI users] SLURM vs. Torque?

2007-10-22 Thread Jeff Squyres
IMNSHO: SLURM, Torque, and N1GE are all fine products. They work well in production environments, both small and large. They all have default trivial FIFO schedulers but can also be used with more complex schedulers (e.g., Maui/Moab). FWIW: I tend to like SLURM simply out of personal

Re: [OMPI users] SLURM vs. Torque?

2007-10-22 Thread Jeff Pummill
SLURM was really easy to build and install, plus it's a project of LLNL and I love stuff that the Nat'l Labs architect. The SLURM message board is also very active and quick to respond to questions and problems. Jeff F. Pummill Bill Johnstone wrote: Hello All. We are starting to need

Re: [OMPI users] SLURM vs. Torque?

2007-10-22 Thread McCalla, Mac
Hi Bill, Have you taken a peek at http://gridengine.sunsource.net ? Regards, Mac McCalla -Original Message- From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Bill Johnstone Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:29 PM To: us...@open-mpi.org Subject: [OMPI

[OMPI users] SLURM vs. Torque?

2007-10-22 Thread Bill Johnstone
Hello All. We are starting to need resource/scheduling management for our small cluster, and I was wondering if any of you could provide comments on what you think about Torque vs. SLURM? On the basis of the appearance of active development as well as the documentation, SLURM seems to be

[OMPI users] xcode and ompi

2007-10-22 Thread Tony Sheh
Hi all, I'm working in xcode and i'm trying to build an application that links against the OMPI libraries. So far i've included the following files in the build: libmpi.dylib libopen-pal.dylib libopen-rte.dylib and the errors i get are Undefined symbols: all the MPI functions you