Re: [OMPI users] my leak or OpenMPI's leak?

I had this leak with OpenMPI 1.4.2 But in my case, there is no accumulation - when i repeat the same call, no additional leak is reported for the second call Jody On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > There is no OMPI 2.5 - do you mean 1.5? > > On Oct 17,

Re: [OMPI users] Typo in man page for MPI_File_iwrite_at

Fixed. Thanks! On Oct 16, 2010, at 1:06 AM, Jeremiah Willcock wrote: > In the online man page for this function, MPI_MODE_SEQENTIAL should be > MPI_MODE_SEQUENTIAL. Also, > http://www.open-mpi.org/doc/v1.4/man3/MPI_File_open.3.php is showing man page > source code rather than the rendered

Re: [OMPI users] my leak or OpenMPI's leak?

But shouldn't something like this show up in the other processes as well? I only see that in the master process, but the slave processes also send data to each other and to the master. On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:41 AM, jody

Re: [OMPI users] my leak or OpenMPI's leak?

I would guess that the difference is because the master process is communicating to multiple slaves, which causes it to need more memory, so that eventually it has to go get more than the initial block we allocated at startup - but the slaves, talking only to one process, never exceed the