Since your new intra-communicator contains all members, couldn't you
just use the MPI_COMM_WORLD communicator?
2011/6/1 Frédéric Feyel :
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem using MPI_Intercomm_create.
>
> I 5 tasks, let's say T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 resulting from two spawn
> operations by T0.
>
> So I have
Not directly, but your IB network will not run without a subnet manager having
been run at least once.
It's been a few years since I've been an IB vendor, but whenever you bring a
new IB port online (e.g., if a server reboots) it has to check in with the
subnet manager before it will be brought
On May 31, 2011, at 10:55 AM, francoise.r...@obs.ujf-grenoble.fr wrote:
> I reproduced the problem with the following code :
I'm not sure I can reconcile this statement with your later statements...?
> I execute the program on 2 nodes of 12 cores each (a total of 24 processes),
> it doesn't sto
Hi all,
We have a code built with OpenMPI (v1.4.3) and the Intel v12.0 compiler that
has been tested successfully on 10s - 100s of cores on our cluster. We recently
ran the same code with 1020 cores and received the following runtime error:
> [d6cneh042:28543] *** Process received signal ***
>
