[OMPI users] Fwd: EuroMPI 2012 Call for participation

2012-07-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Hope to see some of you in Austria! > EuroMPI 2012 CALL FOR PARTICIPATION > > EuroMPI 2012 - the prime meeting for researchers, developers, and > students in message-passing parallel computing with MPI (and related > paradigms) - calls for *active participation* in the conference which > will ta

[OMPI users] Getting MPI to access processes on a 2nd computer.

2012-07-03 Thread VimalMathew
Hi, I'm trying to run an MPI code using processes on a remote machine. I've connected the 2 machines using a crossover cable and they are communicating with each other(I'm getting ping replies and I can access drives on one another). When I run mpiexec -host system_name MPI_Test.exe, I get

Re: [OMPI users] fortran program with integer kind=8 using openmpi

2012-07-03 Thread Secretan Yves
Hi, I applied the patch of ticket #3148 to my version of openmpi 1.6 and it does the job at least for me. Thanks' for the prompt fix. Yves Secretan yves.secre...@ete.inrs.ca Avant d'imprimer, pensez à l'environnement -Message d'origine- De : users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailt

Re: [OMPI users] fortran program with integer kind=8 using openmpi

2012-07-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
FWIW: I think you'll probably run into issues with MPI attributes (e.g., MPI_COMM_ATTR_SET / GET). I'll file a ticket about those... On Jul 3, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Secretan Yves wrote: > Hi, > > I applied the patch of ticket #3148 to my version of openmpi 1.6 and it does > the job at lea

[OMPI users] fortran program with integer kind=8 using openmpi‏

2012-07-03 Thread William Au
Dear all, Thank you for all responses. There is another problem using -fdefault-integer-8. I am using 1.6.. For the i8: configure:44650: checking for the value of MPI_STATUS_SIZE configure:44674: result: 3 Fortran INTEGERs configure:44866: checking if Fortran compiler works configure:44895: /u

Re: [OMPI users] fortran program with integer kind=8 using openmpi?

2012-07-03 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 04:03:51PM -0700, William Au wrote: > > Dear all, > > Thank you for all responses. There is another problem using > -fdefault-integer-8. I'll make the unsolicited suggestion that you really really really don't want to use the -fdefault-integer-8 option. It would be far b