On Dec 31, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Jim Kusznir wrote:
I have some questions, though.
As you can probably tell, the multi-package stuff hasn't been tested
in quite a while. Thanks for taking it for a spin. :-)
1) am I correct in that OpenMPI needs to be complied with each
compiler that will b
Another simpler (but not secure) option would be do run "xhost
+hostname" for each machine that you'll be using and then use un-
encrypted X connections to pipe back to your display. This avoids a
bunch of issues (e.g., the ssh to launch the MPI job quitting because
it successfully launched
What did you name your executable?
I believe that Open MPI and MPICH differ in how they find executables
via mpirun -- for example, if you named your executable "test" and ran
"mpirun -np 4 test", Open MPI might very well have found /bin/test
rather than the "test" executable in your pwd.
Hi Neeraj
No, we still don't support having a persistent set of daemons acting as some
kind of "virtual machine" like LAM/MPI did. We at one time had talked about
adding it. However, our most recent efforts have actually taken us away from
supporting that mode of operation. As a result, I very muc
