Dear All,
I have installed openmpi-1.3.1 (with the defaults), and built my
application.
The linux box is 2Xamd64 quad. In the middle of running of my application, I
receive the message and stops.
I tried to configure openmpi using "--disable-mpi-threads" but it
automatically assumes "posix".
This
Last time I got such an error was when the shared libraries on my head
node didn't match the one loaded by the compute nodes. It was a simple
LD_LIBRARY_PATH mistake from my part. And it was the last time I
didn't build my tree with --enable-mpirun-prefix-by-default.
george.
On Feb 26, 2
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Justin wrote:
Also the stable version of openmpi on Debian is 1.2.7rc2. Are there
any known issues with this version and valgrid?
To be honest, the Debian OMPI maintainers will need to answer this.
I'm afraid that it's been so long since I've used the 1.2 ser
Also the stable version of openmpi on Debian is 1.2.7rc2. Are there any
known issues with this version and valgrid?
Thanks,
Justin
Justin wrote:
Is there any tricks to getting it to work? When we run with valgrind
we get segfaults, valgrind reports errors in different MPI functions
for exam
Is there any tricks to getting it to work? When we run with valgrind we
get segfaults, valgrind reports errors in different MPI functions for
example:
==3629== Invalid read of size 4
==3629==at 0x1CF7AEEC: (within
/usr/lib/openmpi/lib/openmpi/mca_pml_ob1.so)
==3629==by 0x1D9C23F4: mca
On Feb 26, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Justin wrote:
I'm trying to use valgrind to check if we have any memory problems
in our code when running with parallel processors. However, when I
run using mpi and valgrind I crashes in various places. For example
some of the times it will crash with a segf
FWIW: I tested the trunk tonight using both SLURM and rsh launchers,
and everything checks out fine. However, this is running under SGE and
thus using qrsh, so it is possible the SGE support is having a problem.
Perhaps one of the Sun OMPI developers can help here?
Ralph
On Feb 26, 2009, at
Hey,
I've had a couple of errors recently, of the form:
[[1176,1],0][btl_openib_component.c:2905:handle_wc] from
tango092.vpac.org to: tango090 error polling LP CQ with status RETRY
EXCEEDED ERROR status number 12 for wr_id 38996224 opcode 0 qp_idx 0
--
It looks like the system doesn't know what nodes the procs are to be
placed upon. Can you run this with --display-devel-map? That will tell
us where the system thinks it is placing things.
Thanks
Ralph
On Feb 26, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Mostyn Lewis wrote:
Maybe it's my pine mailer.
This is a N
Hi,
I'm trying to use valgrind to check if we have any memory problems in
our code when running with parallel processors. However, when I run
using mpi and valgrind I crashes in various places. For example some of
the times it will crash with a segfault within MPI_Allgatherv despite
the fa
Maybe it's my pine mailer.
This is a NAMD run on 256 procs across 32 dual-socket quad-core AMD
shangai nodes running a standard benchmark called stmv.
The basic error message, which occurs 31 times is like:
[s0164:24296] [[64102,0],16] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in file
../../../.././orte/mca/o
I'm sorry, but I can't make any sense of this message. Could you
provide a little explanation of what you are doing, what the system
looks like, what is supposed to happen, etc? I can barely parse your
cmd line...
Thanks
Ralph
On Feb 26, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Mostyn Lewis wrote:
Today's and
Today's and yesterdays.
1.4a1r20643_svn
+ mpirun --prefix
/tools/openmpi/1.4a1r20643_svn/connectx/intel64/10.1.015/openib/suse_sles_10/x86_6
4/opteron -np 256 --mca btl sm,openib,self -x
OMPI_MCA_btl_openib_use_eager_rdma -x OMPI_MCA_btl_ope
nib_eager_limit -x OMPI_MCA_btl_self_eager_limit -x
Eugene / Dorian,
Thanks for the advice. I didn't appreciate that it was necessary to
explicitly complete the first send by an MPI call. I assumed that when the
second receive was complete the first send must also have been completed and
all would be ok. In any case, I'm now using MPI_Probe to e
Mark Allan wrote:
Dear all,
With this simple code I find I am getting a memory leak when I run on 2
processors. Can anyone advise why?
I suspect the prototype of nonBlockingRecv is actually
MPI_Request nonBlockingRecv(int **t, int &size, const int tag, const int
senderRank)
and in thi
Mark Allan wrote:
Dear all,
With this simple code I find I am getting a memory leak when I run on 2
processors. Can anyone advise why?
I'm fairly new to MPI (have only done very simple things in the past).
I'm trying to do a non-blocking send
Dear all,
With this simple code I find I am getting a memory leak when I run on 2
processors. Can anyone advise why?
I'm fairly new to MPI (have only done very simple things in the past). I'm
trying to do a non-blocking send/recv (from any proc to any proc) but the
receiving processor doesn'
Hello,
Does anyone has installed OMPI on a HPUX system?
I do apprciate any info.
Best Regards.
Nader
Schweet! Sorry it took so long to figure out...
On Feb 26, 2009, at 7:54 AM, Kiril Dichev wrote:
I am happy to confirm that Jeff's suggestion worked.
The problem was following: in previous versions VampirServer issued
ComLib = dlopen( driverName, RTLD_LAZY );
Changing this to following
I am happy to confirm that Jeff's suggestion worked.
The problem was following: in previous versions VampirServer issued
ComLib = dlopen( driverName, RTLD_LAZY );
Changing this to following fixed the problem:
ComLib = dlopen( driverName, RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_GLOBAL );
The VampirServe
Hi I have been looking to the code.
and some documentation.
By apple documentation the finalize method should never been call.
so that seems to be erroneous
the connection belong to an autorelease pool that is release just after it
and due to the comment in the code
/* need to shut down con
Hi,
the daemons will fork into daemon land - no accounting, no control by
SGE via qdel (nevertheless it runs, just not tightly integrated):
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/1783
-- Reuti
Am 26.02.2009 um 06:13 schrieb Sangamesh B:
Hello Reuti,
I'm sorry for the late response
Yes Brian
Its in Leopard.
thanks for your interest.
Ricardo
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote:
> Ricardo -
>
> That's really interesting. THis is on a Leopard system, right? I'm the
> author/maintainer of the xgrid code. Unfortunately, I've been hiding trying
> to finis
Hello Reuti,
I'm sorry for the late response.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Reuti wrote:
> Am 25.01.2009 um 06:16 schrieb Sangamesh B:
>
>> Thanks Reuti for the reply.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Reuti wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 24.01.2009 um 17:12 schrieb Jeremy Stout:
>>>
The RLI
24 matches
Mail list logo
