On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:30:11PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 2:25 PM, Martin Siegert wrote:
>
> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/unofficial/openmpi-1.6.1ticket3131r26612M.tar.bz2
> >
> > Thanks! I tried this and, indeed, the program (I tested quantum espresso,
> >
Good. :)
It works.
integer(kind=4) nprocs, myrank, dest, source, tag, ierr, tagi
Thank you,
Ali
RWTH Aachen
From: "Iliev, Hristo"
To: Open MPI Users
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 9:00 PM
Subject: [OMPI users]
Open MPI 1.3.4 is pretty ancient. Can you upgrade to Open MPI 1.6?
On Jun 27, 2012, at 2:59 PM, William Au wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I ran multiple processes in a single machine, the programs are hanging
> in mpi_allreduce in different points
> during different runs. I am using 1.3.4. When I
Hit Reply by mistake instead of Reply to all...
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Hristo Iliev
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] MPI Problem
> Date: 27 юни 2012 20:58:55 CEST
> To: Mohamad Ali Rostami
>
> Hi,
>
> I spotted "-fdefault-integer-8" in the
Hi,
When I ran multiple processes in a single machine, the programs are
hanging in mpi_allreduce in different points
during different runs. I am using 1.3.4. When I used different machines
to run the processes, it is OK. Also, when
I recompiled open mpi in debug mode, the problem goes
Hey
Yes, I am from RWTH Aachen, doing Hybrid Parallelization of some code on HPC.
These are the outputs from the command line:
$ mpif90 --showme
gfortran -I/opt/MPI/openmpi-1.5.3/linux/gcc/include -fexceptions -pthread
-I/opt/MPI/openmpi-1.5.3/linux/gcc/lib
On Jun 27, 2012, at 2:25 PM, Martin Siegert wrote:
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/~jsquyres/unofficial/openmpi-1.6.1ticket3131r26612M.tar.bz2
>
> Thanks! I tried this and, indeed, the program (I tested quantum espresso,
> pw.x, so far) no longer hangs.
Good! We're doing a bit more definitive
Hi Jeff,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 04:16:12PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Martin Siegert wrote:
>
> > by now we know of three programs - dirac, wrf, quantum espresso - that
> > all hang with openmpi-1.4.x (have not yet checked with openmpi-1.6).
> > All of these
On Jun 27, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Lloyd Brown wrote:
> That's a really good idea. The trouble is that I need to have multiple
> versions installed (eg. compiled with the various compilers), so I think
> I still need to manipulate name in some way, so the packages will be
> named differently. But
That's a really good idea. The trouble is that I need to have multiple
versions installed (eg. compiled with the various compilers), so I think
I still need to manipulate name in some way, so the packages will be
named differently. But _prefix should definitely give me more
flexibility as to
I will appreciate if he would respond to my earlier inquiry as he appears to
be a user of our computing facilities.
--
Hristo Iliev, Ph.D. -- High Performance Computing
RWTH Aachen University, Center for Computing and Communication
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
On Jun 27, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Mohamad Ali Rostami wrote:
> It seems that the problem is solved.
>
> Actually, when I replaced "use mpi" by "include "mipf.h".
You lose all parameter type checking this way.
> And adding -lmpi -lmpi90, everything works.
You should not need to do this for Open
Hmm. I'm not sure why --rebuild is different than not--rebuild. I'm not an
RPM expert, though...
On Jun 26, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Lloyd Brown wrote:
> Something else interesting that I just discovered. If I do this, I have
> the problem:
>
> rpmbuild --rebuild -bb path/to/openmpi-1.6-2.src.rpm
On Jun 26, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Lloyd Brown wrote:
> Is there an easy way with the .spec file and the rpmbuild command, for
> me to override the path the OpenMPI RPM installs into, in /opt?
> Basically, I'm already doing something like this:
I think all you need to do is override the RPM-builtin
It seems that the problem is solved.
Actually, when I replaced "use mpi" by "include "mipf.h".
And adding -lmpi -lmpi90, everything works.
I think you need these two "-lmpi -lmpi90" when you have Blas or LAPACK
libraries.
Regards,
Ali
From: Jeff Squyres
Per other replies on this thread, I think you're missing some -l (and possibly
-L) options on your compile line.
You probably don't need --showme to see exactly what mpif90 is doing because it
looks like the issue is not with mpif90, but rather with the arguments that
you're passing to it.
>
> Dear Tim
>>>
>>
> I built netcdf with mpif90using this option
>>
>>
./configure MPIF90=/home/openmpi/bin/mpif90
and compiled the application using mpif90 comipler option.
Regards
Ahsan
> If your mpif90 is properly built and set up with the same Fortran
> compiler you are using, it
Dear Dima
I was not sure but it seemed to be like something related to netcdf and
mpif90. I have struggling with the compilation of comso, int2lm parallel
has been installed successfully but cosmo is giving this error. I don't
have any -lnetcdf or -lnetcdff in linker options of the Fopts file. I
Dear Jeff
Can you explain a little how to get this. "* you can take the mpif90
command that is being used to generate these errors and add "--showme" to
the end of it, and you'll see what underlying compiler command is being
executed under the covers."*
*
*
Regards
Ahsan
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at
Hi guys,
This is the reconsidered concept about our semi-automatic optimized parallel
I/O system. Referring to the last discussion please take a look at the
following link:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2012/06/19517.php
Thank Ralph and Jeff for giving me so many advises. The
Hi,
Could you please compare the output from "mpif77/mpif90 -showme" when
executed from the command line and from inside the Makefile? Could you also
check that the argument to MPI_INIT is a normal INTEGER and is not getting
some funny KIND or preprocessor treatment?
Regards,
--
Hristo
Something strange,
By adding all the libraries which I found from mpif90/mpif77 --showme,
Fortran 77 version worked finally,
but Fortran 90 version still has the problem.
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'mpi_init' at (1)
any idea??
22 matches
Mail list logo