Re: [OMPI users] Busy waiting [was Re: (no subject)]

2008-04-24 Thread Ingo Josopait
Barry Rountree schrieb: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:56:03PM +0200, Ingo Josopait wrote: >> I am using one of the nodes as a desktop computer. Therefore it is most >> important for me that the mpi program is not so greedily acquiring cpu >> time. > > This i

Re: [OMPI users] Busy waiting [was Re: (no subject)]

2008-04-24 Thread Ingo Josopait
eps not for a fixed time, but until new messages arrive. Barry Rountree schrieb: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:38:41PM +0200, Ingo Josopait wrote: >> I can think of several advantages that using blocking or signals to >> reduce the cpu load would have: >> >>

Re: [OMPI users] (no subject)

2008-04-23 Thread Ingo Josopait
I can think of several advantages that using blocking or signals to reduce the cpu load would have: - Reduced energy consumption - Running additional background programs could be done far more efficiently - It would be much simpler to examine the load balance. It may depend on the type of

[OMPI users] idle calls?

2008-04-23 Thread Ingo Josopait
I noticed that the cpu usage of an mpi program is always at 100 percent, even if the tasks are doing nothing but wait for new data to arrive. Is there an option to change this behavior, so that the tasks sleep until new data arrive? Why is this the default behavior, anyway? Is it really so costly