On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:38:54 -0700, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Could you encode it into the tag?
This sounds dangerous.
> Or, append a data type to the front of each message?
This is the idea, unfortunately this still requires multiple messages
for collectives (because you
Le lundi 26 avril 2010 à 16:51 +0100, Dave Love a écrit :
> Sylvestre Ledru writes:
>
> > I am currently extending an application with MPI capabilities.
> > This high-level application allows users to use dynamic types. Therefor,
> > on the slaves, I have no way to
Sylvestre Ledru writes:
> I am currently extending an application with MPI capabilities.
> This high-level application allows users to use dynamic types. Therefor,
> on the slaves, I have no way to know what the master will send me.
Have you looked at existing MPI
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am currently extending an application with MPI capabilities.
This high-level application allows users to use dynamic types. Therefor,
on the slaves, I have no way to know what the master will send me.
Therefor, in the slave side, I need to "guess" what I am
of
string as languages such as Visual Basic, Visual C++ and C# do in the GUI.
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On
Behalf Of Sylvestre Ledru
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:46 AM
To: us...@open-mpi.org
Subject: [OMPI users] How to "
Hello,
I am currently extending an application with MPI capabilities.
This high-level application allows users to use dynamic types. Therefor,
on the slaves, I have no way to know what the master will send me.
Therefor, in the slave side, I need to "guess" what I am receiving.
For example, I