Re: [OMPI users] Is Iprobe fast when there is no message to recieve

2009-10-03 Thread Ashley Pittman
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 07:05 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote: > That being said, if you just want to send a quick "notify" that an > event has occurred, you might want to use a specific tag and/or > communicator for these extraordinary messages. Then, when the event > occurs, send a very short

Re: [OMPI users] Is Iprobe fast when there is no message to recieve

2009-10-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Keep in mind that MPI says you do have to eventually receive the message -- so just checking if it's there is not enough (eventually). Iprobe is definitely one way. You could also post a non-blocking receive (persistent or not) and MPI_TEST to see if it has completed. However, if the

[OMPI users] Is Iprobe fast when there is no message to recieve

2009-10-01 Thread Peter Lonjers
I am not sure if this is the right place the ask this question but here it goes. Simplified abstract version of the question. I have 2 MPI processes and I want one to make an occasional signal to the other process. These signals will not happen at predictable times. I want the other process