Re: [OMPI users] Memchecker report on v1.3b2 (includes potential bug reports)

2008-12-11 Thread Jeff Squyres
Don't change it yet. There's still fairly furious debate about exactly this issue for MPI-2.2. So I wouldn't say that the Forum has agreed to it yet. :-) On Nov 19, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Shiqing Fan wrote: Hi Martin, Thanks for the information. So it will be changed also for memchecker.

Re: [OMPI users] Memchecker report on v1.3b2 (includes potential bug reports)

2008-11-19 Thread Shiqing Fan
Hi Martin, Thanks for the information. So it will be changed also for memchecker. Regards, Shiqing The (non modifying) access to a send buffer was agreed for MPI Standard 2.2 not version 2.1 see the MPI 2.2 Wiki: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/MpiTwoTwoWikiPage htt

Re: [OMPI users] Memchecker report on v1.3b2 (includes potential bug reports)

2008-11-19 Thread Audet, Martin
4) Well, this sounds reasonable, but according to the MPI-1 standard (see page 40 for non-blocking send/recv, a more detailed explanation in page 30): "A nonblocking send call indicates that the system may start copying data out of the send buffer. The sender shoul

Re: [OMPI users] Memchecker report on v1.3b2 (includes potential bug reports)

2008-11-19 Thread Shiqing Fan
Hi George, 4) Well, this sounds reasonable, but according to the MPI-1 standard (see page 40 for non-blocking send/recv, a more detailed explanation in page 30): "A nonblocking send call indicates that the system may start copying data out of the send buffer. The sender should */not access*/ a

Re: [OMPI users] Memchecker report on v1.3b2 (includes potential bug reports)

2008-11-19 Thread George Bosilca
On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:18 , François PELLEGRINI wrote: 4) Well, this sounds reasonable, but according to the MPI-1 standard (see page 40 for non-blocking send/recv, a more detailed explanation in page 30): "A nonblocking send call indicates that the system may start copying data out of the

Re: [OMPI users] Memchecker report on v1.3b2 (includes potential bug reports)

2008-11-19 Thread François PELLEGRINI
Bonjour Shiqing, Shiqing Fan wrote: > Dear François, > > Thanks a lot for your report, it's really a great help for us. :-) No problem. Your software helps me too, so as soon as you have fixes and new builds please tell me, so that I can try again. > For the issues: > 1) When you got "Condit

Re: [OMPI users] Memchecker report on v1.3b2 (includes potential bug reports)

2008-11-19 Thread Shiqing Fan
Dear François, Thanks a lot for your report, it's really a great help for us. :-) For the issues: 1) When you got "Conditional jump" errors, normally that means some uninitialized(or undefined) values were used. The parameters that passed into PMPI_Init_thread might contain uninitialized va

[OMPI users] Memchecker report on v1.3b2 (includes potential bug reports)

2008-11-19 Thread François PELLEGRINI
Hello all, I am the main developer of the Scotch parallel graph partitioning package, which uses both MPI and Posix Pthreads. I have been doing a great deal of testing of my program on various platforms and libraries, searching for potential bugs (there may still be some ;-) ). The new memchec