:11 PM, users-requ...@open-mpi.org wrote:
--
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:10:57 -0600
From: Brian Barrett <brbar...@open-mpi.org>
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Memory question and possible bug in 64bit
addressing under Leopard!
To: Open MPI Users <u
Brian,
Thanks, and my apologies.
This is an issue once known to me on an old CRAY/SGI, but lost in the
mists of time (>10 years). Stack size increase did the trick. Of
course putting everything on the heap via new and malloc would work
for arrays, but that creates such an inelegant looking
but not in C++.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf
Of Brian Barrett
Sent: April 25, 2008 16:11
To: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Memory question and possible bug in 64bit addressing
under Leopard!
On Apr
On Apr 25, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Brian Barrett wrote:
On Apr 25, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Gregory John Orris wrote:
produces a core dump on a machine with 12Gb of RAM.
and the error message
mpiexec noticed that job rank 0 with PID 75545 on node mymachine.com
exited on signal 4 (Illegal instruction).
On Apr 25, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Gregory John Orris wrote:
produces a core dump on a machine with 12Gb of RAM.
and the error message
mpiexec noticed that job rank 0 with PID 75545 on node mymachine.com
exited on signal 4 (Illegal instruction).
However, substituting in
float *X = new float[n];
