Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI vs IBM MPI performance help

2010-12-22 Thread Eugene Loh
, 2010 11:29 AM To: Open MPI Users Cc: Stern, Craig J Subject: EXTERNAL: [OMPI users] Open MPI vs IBM MPI performance help OpenMPI version: 1.4.3 Platform: IBM P5, 32 processors, 256 GB memory, Symmetric Multi-Threading (SMT) enabled Application: starts up 48 processes and does MPI using MPI_Barrier

Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI vs IBM MPI performance help

2010-12-03 Thread Nysal Jan
Collecting MPI Profile information might help narrow down the issue. You could use some of the tools mentioned here - http://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=perftools --Nysal On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Price, Brian M (N-KCI) < brian.m.pr...@lmco.com> wrote: > OpenMPI version: 1.4.3 > >

Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI vs IBM MPI performance help

2010-12-02 Thread David Singleton
J Subject: EXTERNAL: [OMPI users] Open MPI vs IBM MPI performance help OpenMPI version: 1.4.3 Platform: IBM P5, 32 processors, 256 GB memory, Symmetric Multi-Threading (SMT) enabled Application: starts up 48 processes and does MPI using MPI_Barrier, MPI_Get, MPI_Put (lots of transfers, large

Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI vs IBM MPI performance help

2010-12-02 Thread Price, Brian M (N-KCI)
: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Price, Brian M (N-KCI) Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:29 AM To: Open MPI Users Cc: Stern, Craig J Subject: EXTERNAL: [OMPI users] Open MPI vs IBM MPI performance help OpenMPI version: 1.4.3 Platform: IBM P5, 32

[OMPI users] Open MPI vs IBM MPI performance help

2010-12-01 Thread Price, Brian M (N-KCI)
OpenMPI version: 1.4.3 Platform: IBM P5, 32 processors, 256 GB memory, Symmetric Multi-Threading (SMT) enabled Application: starts up 48 processes and does MPI using MPI_Barrier, MPI_Get, MPI_Put (lots of transfers, large amounts of data) Issue: When implemented using Open MPI vs. IBM's MPI