"Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" writes:
> As I mentioned Craig and I debated long and hard to change that
> default, but, in summary, we apparently missed this clause on p610.
> I'll change it back.
Okay, thanks.
> I'll be happy when gfortran 4.9 is released that supports ignore
On Jan 7, 2014, at 11:23 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> On page 610, I see text disallowing the explicit interfaces in
> ompi/mpi/fortran/use-mpi-tkr:
>
> In S2 and S3: [snip]
>
> Why did OMPI decide that this (presumably non-normative) text in the
> standard was not worth
"Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" writes:
> Yes, I can explain what's going on here. The short version is that a
> change was made with the intent to provide maximum Fortran code
> safety, but with a possible backwards compatibility issue. If this
> change is causing real problems,
On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:09 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> - the old tiny/small/medium-based interface for compilers that do not support
> "ignore TKR" pragmas (i.e., gfortran)
And of course, as soon as I say this publicly, I see a post from Tobias
reminding me that gcc/gfortran
Yes, I can explain what's going on here. The short version is that a change
was made with the intent to provide maximum Fortran code safety, but with a
possible backwards compatibility issue. If this change is causing real
problems, we can probably change this, but I'd like a little feedback
The attached code is from the example on page 629-630 (17.1.15 Fortran
Derived Types) of MPI-3. This compiles cleanly with MPICH and with OMPI
1.6.5, but not with the latest OMPI. Arrays higher than rank 4 would
have a similar problem since they are not enumerated. Did someone
decide that a