On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:42:15 -0500, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
> I'll give that a try, too. IMHO, MPI_Pack/Unpack looks easier and less
> error prone, but Pacheco advocates using derived types over
> MPI_Pack/Unpack.
I would recommend using derived types for big structures, or perhaps for
long-lived
Prentice Bisbal wrote:
> I hit send to early on my last reply, please forgive me...
>
> Jed Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:54:10 -0500, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
>>> but I don't have that book handy
>> The standard has lots of examples.
>>
>> http://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/docs.html
>
>
I hit send to early on my last reply, please forgive me...
Jed Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:54:10 -0500, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
>> but I don't have that book handy
>
> The standard has lots of examples.
>
> http://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/docs.html
Thanks, I'll check out those example
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:54:10 -0500, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
> but I don't have that book handy
The standard has lots of examples.
http://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/docs.html
You can do this, but for small structures, you're better off just
packing buffers. For large structures containing variable
Hello, again MPU Users:
This question is similar to my earlier one about MPI_Pack/Unpack,
I'm trying to send the following structure, which has a dynamically
allocated array in it, as a MPI derived type using MPI_Create_type_struct():
typedef struct{
int index;
int* coords;
}point;
I woul
