am
> not sure why it would expand based on stack size?.
>
> --td
>> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:21:46 +0100
>> From: Paul Kapinos <kapi...@rz.rwth-aachen.de>
>> Subject: [OMPI users] exceedingly virtual memory consumption of MPI
>> environment if higher-setting &
>> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:21:46 +0100
>> From: Paul Kapinos <kapi...@rz.rwth-aachen.de>
>> Subject: [OMPI users] exceedingly virtual memory consumption of MPI
>> environment if higher-setting "ulimit -s"
>> To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.o
+0100
>> From: Paul Kapinos <kapi...@rz.rwth-aachen.de>
>> Subject: [OMPI users] exceedingly virtual memory consumption of MPI
>> environment if higher-setting "ulimit -s"
>> To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org>
>> Message-ID: <4b058cba
From: Paul Kapinos <kapi...@rz.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: [OMPI users] exceedingly virtual memory consumption of MPI
environment if higher-setting "ulimit -s"
To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org>
Message-ID: <4b058cba.3000...@rz.rwth-aachen.de>
Content-Type: tex
to the predefined handles? Though I am
not sure why it would expand based on stack size?.
--td
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:21:46 +0100
From: Paul Kapinos <kapi...@rz.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: [OMPI users] exceedingly virtual memory consumption of MPI
environment if higher-setting &quo
chen.de
> To: us...@open-mpi.org
> Subject: [OMPI users] exceedingly virtual memory consumption of MPI
> environment if higher-setting "ulimit -s"
>
> Hi volks,
>
> we see an exeedingly *virtual* memory consumtion through MPI processes
> if "ulimit -s&
Hi volks,
we see an exeedingly *virtual* memory consumtion through MPI processes
if "ulimit -s" (stack size)in profile configuration was setted higher.
Furthermore we believe, every mpi process started, wastes about the
double size of `ulimit -s` value which will be set in a fresh console
