On Mar 8, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Let's say you have multi-threaded MPI processes, you request
> MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE and get MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE, and you use the self,sm,tcp
> BTLs (which have some degree of threading support). Is it okay to have an
> [MPI_Isend|MPI_Irecv] on
Durga Choudhury wrote:
A follow-up question (and pardon if this sounds stupid) is this:
If I want to make my process multithreaded, BUT only one thread has
anything to do with MPI (for example, using OpenMP inside MPI), then
the results will be correct EVEN IF #1 or #2 of Eugene holds
A follow-up question (and pardon if this sounds stupid) is this:
If I want to make my process multithreaded, BUT only one thread has
anything to do with MPI (for example, using OpenMP inside MPI), then
the results will be correct EVEN IF #1 or #2 of Eugene holds true. Is
this correct?
Thanks
Let's say you have multi-threaded MPI processes, you request
MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE and get MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE, and you use the
self,sm,tcp BTLs (which have some degree of threading support). Is it
okay to have an [MPI_Isend|MPI_Irecv] on one thread be completed by an
MPI_Wait on another
