Re: [OMPI users] rdmacm and udcm failure in 2.0.1 on RoCE

2016-12-16 Thread Brendan Myers
Hello,

I can confirm that using these flags:

--mca btl_openib_receive_queues P,65536,120,64,32 --mca btl_openib_cpc_include 
rdmacm

I am able to run Open MPI version 2.0.1 over a RoCE fabric.  Hope this helps

 

Thank you,

Brendan Myers

Software Forge

 

From: users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Dave Turner
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 4:41 PM
To: users@lists.open-mpi.org
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] rdmacm and udcm failure in 2.0.1 on RoCE

 

 

Nathan:  Thanks for providing the debug flags.  I've attached the 

output (NetPIPE.debug1) which basically shows that for RoCE the

udcm_component_query() will always fail.  Can someone verify if

this is correct that udcm is not supported for RoCE?  When I change

the test to force usage it does not work (NetPIPE.debug2).

 

[hero35][[38845,1],0][connect/btl_openib_connect_udcm.c:452:udcm_component_query]
 UD CPC only supported on InfiniBand; skipped on mlx4_0:1

[hero35][[38845,1],0][connect/btl_openib_connect_udcm.c:501:udcm_component_query]
 unavailable for use on mlx4_0:1; skipped

 

from btl_openib_connect_udcm.c

 

 438 static int udcm_component_query(mca_btl_openib_module_t *btl,

 439 opal_btl_openib_connect_base_module_t 
**cpc)

 440 {

 441 udcm_module_t *m = NULL;

 442 int rc = OPAL_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED;

 443

 444 do {

 445 /* If we do not have struct ibv_device.transport_device, then

 446we're in an old version of OFED that is IB only (i.e., no

 447iWarp), so we can safely assume that we can use this CPC. */

 448 #if defined(HAVE_STRUCT_IBV_DEVICE_TRANSPORT_TYPE) && 
HAVE_DECL_IBV_LINK_LAYER_ETHERN ET

 449 if (BTL_OPENIB_CONNECT_BASE_CHECK_IF_NOT_IB(btl)) {

 450 BTL_VERBOSE(("UD CPC only supported on InfiniBand; skipped on 
%s:%d",

 451  ibv_get_device_name(btl->device->ib_dev),

 452  btl->port_num));

 453 break;

 454 }

 455 #endif

 

from base.h

 

#ifdef OPAL_HAVE_RDMAOE

#define BTL_OPENIB_CONNECT_BASE_CHECK_IF_NOT_IB(btl)   \

(((IBV_TRANSPORT_IB != ((btl)->device->ib_dev->transport_type)) || \

(IBV_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET == ((btl)->ib_port_attr.link_layer))) ?   \

true : false)

#else

#define BTL_OPENIB_CONNECT_BASE_CHECK_IF_NOT_IB(btl)   \

((IBV_TRANSPORT_IB != ((btl)->device->ib_dev->transport_type)) ?   \

true : false)

#endif

 

So clearly for RoCE the transport is InfiniBand and the link layer is Ethernet

so this will show that NOT_IB() is true, meaning that udcm is evidently

not supported for RoCE.  udcm definitely fails under 1.10.4 for RoCE in

our tests.  That means we need rdmacm to work which it evidently does

not at the moment for 2.0.1.  Could someone please verify that rdmacm

is not currently working in 2.0.1?  And therefore I'm assuming that 

2.0.1 has not been successfully tested on RoCE???

 

   Dave

 

 


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:12:16 -0700
From: Nathan Hjelm  >
To: drdavetur...@gmail.com  , Open MPI Users 
 >
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] rdmacm and udcm failure in 2.0.1 on RoCE
Message-ID: <32528c5d-14bc-42ce-b19a-684b81801...@me.com 
 >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Can you configure with ?enable-debug and run with ?mca btl_base_verbose 100 and 
provide the output? It may indicate why neither udcm nor rdmacm are available.

-Nathan


> On Dec 14, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Dave Turner   > wrote:
>
> --
> No OpenFabrics connection schemes reported that they were able to be
> used on a specific port.  As such, the openib BTL (OpenFabrics
> support) will be disabled for this port.
>
>   Local host:   elf22
>   Local device: mlx4_2
>   Local port:   1
>   CPCs attempted:   rdmacm, udcm
> --
>
> We have had no problems using 1.10.4 on RoCE but 2.0.1 fails to
> find either connection manager.  I've read that rdmacm may have
> issues under 2.0.1 so udcm may be the only one working.  Are there
> any known issues with that on RoCE?  Or does this just mean we
> don't have RoCE configured correctly?
>
>   Dave Turner
>
> --
> Work: davetur...@ksu.edu   (785) 532-7791 
>  
>  2219 Engineering Hall, Manhattan KS  66506
> Home:drdavetur...@gmail.com  
>   cell: (785) 770-5929 

Re: [OMPI users] rdmacm and udcm failure in 2.0.1 on RoCE

2016-12-15 Thread Dave Turner
Nathan:  Thanks for providing the debug flags.  I've attached the
output (NetPIPE.debug1) which basically shows that for RoCE the
udcm_component_query() will always fail.  Can someone verify if
this is correct that udcm is not supported for RoCE?  When I change
the test to force usage it does not work (NetPIPE.debug2).

[hero35][[38845,1],0][connect/btl_openib_connect_udcm.c:452:udcm_component_query]
UD CPC only supported on InfiniBand; skipped on mlx4_0:1
[hero35][[38845,1],0][connect/btl_openib_connect_udcm.c:501:udcm_component_query]
unavailable for use on mlx4_0:1; skipped

from btl_openib_connect_udcm.c

 438 static int udcm_component_query(mca_btl_openib_module_t *btl,
 439 opal_btl_openib_connect_base_module_t
**cpc)
 440 {
 441 udcm_module_t *m = NULL;
 442 int rc = OPAL_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
 443
 444 do {
 445 /* If we do not have struct ibv_device.transport_device, then
 446we're in an old version of OFED that is IB only (i.e., no
 447iWarp), so we can safely assume that we can use this CPC. */
 448 #if defined(HAVE_STRUCT_IBV_DEVICE_TRANSPORT_TYPE) &&
HAVE_DECL_IBV_LINK_LAYER_ETHERN ET
 449 if (BTL_OPENIB_CONNECT_BASE_CHECK_IF_NOT_IB(btl)) {
 450 BTL_VERBOSE(("UD CPC only supported on InfiniBand; skipped
on %s:%d",
 451  ibv_get_device_name(btl->device->ib_dev),
 452  btl->port_num));
 453 break;
 454 }
 455 #endif

from base.h

#ifdef OPAL_HAVE_RDMAOE
#define BTL_OPENIB_CONNECT_BASE_CHECK_IF_NOT_IB(btl)   \
(((IBV_TRANSPORT_IB != ((btl)->device->ib_dev->transport_type)) || \
(IBV_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET == ((btl)->ib_port_attr.link_layer))) ?   \
true : false)
#else
#define BTL_OPENIB_CONNECT_BASE_CHECK_IF_NOT_IB(btl)   \
((IBV_TRANSPORT_IB != ((btl)->device->ib_dev->transport_type)) ?   \
true : false)
#endif

So clearly for RoCE the transport is InfiniBand and the link layer is
Ethernet
so this will show that NOT_IB() is true, meaning that udcm is evidently
not supported for RoCE.  udcm definitely fails under 1.10.4 for RoCE in
our tests.  That means we need rdmacm to work which it evidently does
not at the moment for 2.0.1.  Could someone please verify that rdmacm
is not currently working in 2.0.1?  And therefore I'm assuming that
2.0.1 has not been successfully tested on RoCE???

   Dave



> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:12:16 -0700
> From: Nathan Hjelm 
> To: drdavetur...@gmail.com, Open MPI Users 
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] rdmacm and udcm failure in 2.0.1 on RoCE
> Message-ID: <32528c5d-14bc-42ce-b19a-684b81801...@me.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Can you configure with ?enable-debug and run with ?mca btl_base_verbose
> 100 and provide the output? It may indicate why neither udcm nor rdmacm are
> available.
>
> -Nathan
>
>
> > On Dec 14, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Dave Turner  wrote:
> >
> > 
> --
> > No OpenFabrics connection schemes reported that they were able to be
> > used on a specific port.  As such, the openib BTL (OpenFabrics
> > support) will be disabled for this port.
> >
> >   Local host:   elf22
> >   Local device: mlx4_2
> >   Local port:   1
> >   CPCs attempted:   rdmacm, udcm
> > 
> --
> >
> > We have had no problems using 1.10.4 on RoCE but 2.0.1 fails to
> > find either connection manager.  I've read that rdmacm may have
> > issues under 2.0.1 so udcm may be the only one working.  Are there
> > any known issues with that on RoCE?  Or does this just mean we
> > don't have RoCE configured correctly?
> >
> >   Dave Turner
> >
> > --
> > Work: davetur...@ksu.edu (785) 532-7791
> >  2219 Engineering Hall, Manhattan KS  66506
> > Home:drdavetur...@gmail.com
> >   cell: (785) 770-5929
> > ___
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.open-mpi.org
> > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> --
Work: davetur...@ksu.edu (785) 532-7791
 2219 Engineering Hall, Manhattan KS  66506
Home:drdavetur...@gmail.com
  cell: (785) 770-5929


NetPIPE.debug1
Description: Binary data


NetPIPE.debug2
Description: Binary data
___
users mailing list
users@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OMPI users] rdmacm and udcm failure in 2.0.1 on RoCE

2016-12-14 Thread Nathan Hjelm
Can you configure with —enable-debug and run with —mca btl_base_verbose 100 and 
provide the output? It may indicate why neither udcm nor rdmacm are available.

-Nathan


> On Dec 14, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Dave Turner  wrote:
> 
> --
> No OpenFabrics connection schemes reported that they were able to be
> used on a specific port.  As such, the openib BTL (OpenFabrics
> support) will be disabled for this port.
> 
>   Local host:   elf22
>   Local device: mlx4_2
>   Local port:   1
>   CPCs attempted:   rdmacm, udcm
> --
> 
> We have had no problems using 1.10.4 on RoCE but 2.0.1 fails to
> find either connection manager.  I've read that rdmacm may have
> issues under 2.0.1 so udcm may be the only one working.  Are there
> any known issues with that on RoCE?  Or does this just mean we
> don't have RoCE configured correctly?
> 
>   Dave Turner
> 
> -- 
> Work: davetur...@ksu.edu (785) 532-7791
>  2219 Engineering Hall, Manhattan KS  66506
> Home:drdavetur...@gmail.com
>   cell: (785) 770-5929
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
users mailing list
users@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users