Re: [Users] same MPLS for multiple interfaces

2016-06-28 Thread mad Engineer
Thank you Harshad and Kevin On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Harshad Nakil wrote: > No, labels are property of the source of the route. Source is free to choose > any value. > We restrict it to smaller value so that it is direct index lookup for > performance. > > There are

Re: [Users] same MPLS for multiple interfaces

2016-06-27 Thread Harshad Nakil
No, labels are property of the source of the route. Source is free to choose any value. We restrict it to smaller value so that it is direct index lookup for performance. There are many cases but above is true in case of contrail. Regards -Harshad > On Jun 27, 2016, at 10:34 PM, kevin

Re: [Users] same MPLS for multiple interfaces

2016-06-27 Thread kevin parrikar
Thanks for the very good explanation... i have one more doubt here could you explain that *Since there is no central authority to allocate labels it scales well.* isn't controller which allocates labels On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Harshad Nakil wrote: > MPLS label is

Re: [Users] same MPLS for multiple interfaces

2016-06-27 Thread Harshad Nakil
It is okay if 1. two ip(s) belong to same interface(port). or 2. two ip(s) are on different compute node. Are you seeing any forwarding issues? Until I know your specific case I cannot comment. Regards -Harshad > On Jun 27, 2016, at 10:43 AM, mad Engineer wrote: >