Hi Mike, Am 17.07.2017 um 11:58 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen <d...@opencsw.org>: > Am 14.07.2017 um 15:32 schrieb Mike Schmidt <mschm...@ucar.edu>: >> Do you have any thoughts you can share on why OpenCSW HDF5 support is dated? >> I know the HDFgroup officially stop supporting Solaris x86 as of Feb 2001, >> but your builds kept going well past that time. Did it get to the point >> where it was difficult or impossible to build? For what its worth, I can't >> even get the last version you built for OpenCSW to build on my system. > > No particular reason, just busy with other stuff :-) > > I’ll have a look if I can bump the version. Feel free to ping me in a week if > the package > is not there until then :-)
I don’t quite get how the shared library naming works for this library: the existing HDF5 1.8.7 has the shared libraries libhdf5.so.7.0.1 libhdf5_hl.so.7.0.1 The latest version from the 1.8 branch is 1.8.19 and that one produces libhdf5.so.10.3.0 libhdf5_hl.so.10.2.0 The latest version 1.10.1 produces libhdf5.so.101.0.0 libhdf5_hl.so.100.0.1 These libraries are built regardless whet API version I specify with --with-default-api-version=(v16|v18|v110) If you can tell me what the best for packaging would be I can provide the packages. Best regards — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
