> Furthermore, as an OpenNebula user I'm interested in Swift and whether
> it can be integrated into OpenNebula as storage for VMs.
This is a question I'm also very interested in as OpenNebula currently does not
have an cloud storage component (either S3 or Rackspace compatible). Anyone got
any
Superb! Thank you very much.
Shi
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Daniel Molina Aranda
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This issue is fixed here:
> http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/381
>
> In the next maintenance release this change will be included.
>
> Regards.
>
> On 1 December 2010 19:38, Shi Jin wrote:
>
Hi,
This issue is fixed here:
http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/381
In the next maintenance release this change will be included.
Regards.
On 1 December 2010 19:38, Shi Jin wrote:
> Yeah, same here :| ...
>>
>> OpenNebula can produce the XML output both using the Nokogiri gem or
>> REXML if No
>
> Yeah, same here :| ...
>
> OpenNebula can produce the XML output both using the Nokogiri gem or
> REXML if Nokogiri is not found. I'm using Nokogiri with the last git
> version and all CDATA content I can see is on the same line as the
> enclosing labels.
>
> Perhaps it is the case that you are
Hi, All,
I'm researching the possibility of using Open Nebula as a tool to build
a cloud for HPC purposes. What I'd like to do is use existing HPC
infrastructure to run virtual machine instances and VM-based clusters
for specific applications, the goal being to reduce lead time for
application de
Christophe Hamerling - Petals Link wrote:
> As an active open source developer and supporter I have no doubt about the
> quality and maturity of OpenNebula.
> I was just wondering if any user as also experience with OpenStack and can say
> more about why they switched from OpenStack to OpenNebula
Hi,
> I got it. Somehow if the output is
> in multiple lines, it does not work.
Yeah, same here :| ...
OpenNebula can produce the XML output both using the Nokogiri gem or
REXML if Nokogiri is not found. I'm using Nokogiri with the last git
version and all CDATA content I can see is on t
Hi Steven,
This is an interesting use-case. When we designed the image repository, we
had to make a compromise between "expectable behaviour" and "advanced
customization usage". I guess this falls into the advanced usage, but
OpenNebula is flexible enough to take this challenge.
To automatically
Keith,
I cannot agree with you more.
There is NO virtual infrastructure manager more hackable than OpenNebula!
Shi
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Keith Hudgins wrote:
> Nova (the part of OpenStack that compares with OpenNebula) is *very*
> immature at the moment. It's a brand-spanking new proj
Nova (the part of OpenStack that compares with OpenNebula) is *very*
immature at the moment. It's a brand-spanking new project only a few months
old, and doesn't really do much at the moment. In the long run, it may
compare favorably with OpenNebula, but it will be at least 6 months before
Nova beg
Dear Ignacio,
As an active open source developer and supporter I have no doubt about the
quality and maturity of OpenNebula.
I was just wondering if any user as also experience with OpenStack and can
say more about why they switched from OpenStack to OpenNebula (and I really
hope the switch is thi
Dear Christophe,
We prepared a post [1] with a description of our position as
open-source project when OpenStack was announced in July. From a more
technical point of view, OpenNebula is a mature technology (we started
the development five years ago and did our first release almost three
years ago
12 matches
Mail list logo
