Use the following ONELINER
$ bash -x /var/lib/one/remotes/datastore/vmfs/monitor
From: users-boun...@lists.opennebula.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opennebula.org] On Behalf Of Catalina Quinde
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 5:50 PM
To: Users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re:
Note:
Be aware that the Hudson Valley Community College http://pware.hvcc.edu/ does
not build any packages for IBM anymore( The old ones are still available ) . I
suggest that you switch to http://www.perzl.org/aix/ (*) , give IBM a kick in
their a.. to support AIX better or just forget to
For automation it would be nice to have a defined output format support by an
additional option like -F | --format
Where format could be : stanza , xml , {} or what ever is useful and reliable.
Might ease command output handling .
Example:
--format S # Stanza
ServiceComponent:
FYI:
To execute
!oneadmin@kvmhost1:~ virsh -c qemu:///system nodeinfo
On a SLES11 SP2 system the following needed to be added to the Policy (sh.t)
/etc/PolicyKit/PolicyKit.conf between the config tags to be able to run:
...
match user=oneadmin
return result=yes/
Under KVM Configuration the example for /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf looks like:
...
user = oneadmin
group = oneadmin
dynamic_ownership = 0
...
Where i would assume that group should be set to cloud
Meaning it should look like:
user = oneadmin
group = cloud
dynamic_ownership = 0
, January 15, 2013 7:43 PM
To: Hans-Joachim Ehlers
Cc: Users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re: [one-users] Bug in http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.8:kvmg
/etc/libvirt/qemu.conf ?
I had big issues with that, but today they got solved by the mailing list :)
Our solution was as follows:
addgroup
)
-Original Message-
From: Marco Jagodzinska [mailto:jagodzin...@fh-aachen.de]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:43 PM
To: Hans-Joachim Ehlers
Cc: Users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re: [one-users] Bug in http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.8:kvmg
/etc/libvirt/qemu.conf ?
I had big issues
are budget is tight
With 24 * 256 GB SSD disks. .
In anyway. OpenNebula is a Management System which supports a wide range of
underlying Cluster / Virtual System implementations and does not care much
about the underlying hardware.
So its up to you to decide if you will use KVM,XEN,
Right now it is not in the roadmap for next release. We'll re-consider
it for upcoming releases, though. (Specially if it becomes a popular
request ;)
From my point of view it would be nice if OpenNebula would have an DB
independent interface meaning i do not care whether a mysql, postgres or
...GPFS ...
apologies for hijacking the thread - is there a specific way to configure
this filesystem to work with OpenNebula?
how should we go about to enable this?
To more precise: We will use GPFS as the clustered FS for our KVM hosts. If
OpenNebula works with it - fine. If not then
In case we are going to deploy OpenNebula we will use GPFS as our clustered FS
...
Since it does not answer your question: In case NFS is used you must make sure
that:
• The NFS server exports the FS with the “sync” option. Otherwise data
corruption could/will during server crash.
• The NFS
Just a few remarks on performance: ( All imho )
1) Do not use any kind of asynchronies write. In case of a serious problem your
data might not contains what you expecting.
2) If possible use Jumbo frames. To handle 100K interrupts (1500 bytes ) or 10k
(9000 bytes) interrupts on a 1GbE links
12 matches
Mail list logo
