Re: [one-users] [feature-request] Time-based deployment of virtual machines?

Hi, On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Valerio Schiavoni < valerio.schiav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there an easy way to list all the VMs which do not have a scheduled > shutdown (so that we can send reminders to those users) ? > You can do that easily with a ruby script, or any other language

Re: [one-users] [feature-request] Time-based deployment of virtual machines?

Dear Javier, thanks for the pointer to the scheduled actions support. True, this goes already in the direction of what I was asking, I was not aware of this feature. Is there an easy way to list all the VMs which do not have a scheduled shutdown (so that we can send reminders to those users) ? Th

Re: [one-users] [feature-request] Time-based deployment of virtual machines?

Maybe is not exactly what you want but I think this can be accomplished with scheduled actions: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.6/user/virtual_resource_management/vm_guide_2.html#scheduling-actions On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Valerio Schiavoni wrote: > Hello, > one of the features we'd like

[one-users] [feature-request] Time-based deployment of virtual machines?

Hello, one of the features we'd like for OpenNebula is to allow for time-based deployments of virtual machines. We'd love ON to support the following two scenarios: - upon a new deployment alongside the number of virtual machines to deploy, the template, etc, the user also specifies for how long

Re: [one-users] feature request: save (changes) from vm (back) to (original) template

Make sense, I've updated the issue to include this option in the feature. Cheers Ruben On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Stefan Kooman wrote: > Quoting Ruben S. Montero (rsmont...@opennebula.org): > > Hi Stefan, > > > > Is this a simpler version of http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2637? > > It

Re: [one-users] feature request: save (changes) from vm (back) to (original) template

Quoting Ruben S. Montero (rsmont...@opennebula.org): > Hi Stefan, > > Is this a simpler version of http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2637? It seems to be, although the empasis of #2637 seems to be on the entire vm including image or image snapshot. I was thinking about templates. In order to fix #

Re: [one-users] feature request: save (changes) from vm (back) to (original) template

Hi Stefan, Is this a simpler version of http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2637? Ruben On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Stefan Kooman wrote: > Hi, > > If a VM has been running for a while and has undergone some modifications > during it's lifetime (added a network, disk, resized capacity) it w

[one-users] feature request: save (changes) from vm (back) to (original) template

Hi, If a VM has been running for a while and has undergone some modifications during it's lifetime (added a network, disk, resized capacity) it would be nice to be able to save these changes to the template the vm was created from (or create a new one if original doesn't exist anymore). With a bi

Re: [one-users] feature request: Instantiate as owner/group

Quoting Ruben S. Montero (rsmont...@opennebula.org): > Hi > > I believe this feature is already planned for 4.6 > > http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2615 > > Originally it is only for the group, but it seems that we should extended > also to support the user Ah, I must have missed that feature

Re: [one-users] feature request: Instantiate as owner/group

Hi I believe this feature is already planned for 4.6 http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2615 Originally it is only for the group, but it seems that we should extended also to support the user Cheers Ruben On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Stefan Kooman wrote: > Quoting Carlos Martín Sánchez

Re: [one-users] feature request: Instantiate as owner/group

Quoting Carlos Martín Sánchez (cmar...@opennebula.org): > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Stefan Kooman wrote: > > > Hi List, > > > > I would like to have the ability to instantiate a vm (or create one > > based on a template) on behalf of a user and/or group. At submission > > time one

Re: [one-users] feature request: Instantiate as owner/group

Hi, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Stefan Kooman wrote: > Hi List, > > I would like to have the ability to instantiate a vm (or create one > based on a template) on behalf of a user and/or group. At submission > time oned/sched would check if the user has suitable permissions on all > of the r

[one-users] feature request: Instantiate as owner/group

Hi List, I would like to have the ability to instantiate a vm (or create one based on a template) on behalf of a user and/or group. At submission time oned/sched would check if the user has suitable permissions on all of the resources defined in the template and otherwise fail, i.e.: the same way

Re: [one-users] feature request

Thanks for the patch. Moved it to 4.6 Cheers On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Vladislav Gorbunov wrote: > I patch opennebula-4.4.0/src/vmm/LibVirtDriverKVM.cc for support > MACHINE parameter (in attachment). You can download binary rpm for > CentOS 6.4 (need only oned) with this patch from the

Re: [one-users] feature request

I patch opennebula-4.4.0/src/vmm/LibVirtDriverKVM.cc for support MACHINE parameter (in attachment). You can download binary rpm for CentOS 6.4 (need only oned) with this patch from the https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2296931/rpm/opennebula-server-4.4.0-1.x86_64.rpm But look like libvirt not sup

Re: [one-users] feature request

Great, thanks for your feedback! -- Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 in Berlin, 24-26 September, 2013 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula

Re: [one-users] feature request

Yes, machine types are supported by libvirt. In fact each version of libvirt may have a different machine spec, this might cause issues when migrating vms to a new kvm host with a newer machine spec. For these cases its better to be explicit about the machine type instead of setting it to "pc" or l

Re: [one-users] feature request

Hi, I opened a ticket with your request: http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2143 Is it supported by libvirt? Regards -- Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 in Berlin, 24-26 September, 2013 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data

[one-users] feature request

Hi Please consider adding machine type to the OS section of the machine definition file for kvm Shank For example, in my template definition I have OS=[BOOT="hd",ARCH="x86_64"] But I should be able to use, currently machine is ignored. OS=[BOOT="hd",MACHINE="q35",ARCH="x86_64"] Qemu is curre

Re: [one-users] FEATURE request: duplicated code and failure to use a single environment configuration file

I agree that the boilerplate in the scripts to prepare the environment is messy. One solution could be loading a environment file as you say: --8<-- if [ -z "${ONE_LOCATION}" ]; then . /etc/one/env.sh else . $ONE_LOCATION/etc/env.sh fi -->8-- It is much more concise and can be mor

[one-users] FEATURE request: duplicated code and failure to use a single environment configuration file

Seems every script has the same 10 lines to find common scriptlets to include. Things would be a hell of a lot simpler to maintain if there was a 'env.conf' in /etc/one (or the $ONE_LOCATION equivalent). -- Cloud Services Architect, Senior System Administrator InfoRelay Online Systems (www.in

[one-users] Feature Request

May I request that the VLAN ID assigned to a Host-Managed VLAN network display the VLAN ID when executing "onevnet show [ID]"? Current Output: oneadmin@opennebula-server:~$ onevnet show 2 VIRTUAL NETWORK 2 INFORMATION ID : 2

Re: [one-users] Feature request: Locking of VM, images, nets...

Hi, I think coming versions of ONE will have better authentication + permission handling. Then you'd simply not allow "normal" users to do dangerous stuff. Steffen On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:58 +0200, Giovanni Toraldo wrote: > On 11/05/2011 10:52, Luis M. Carril wrote: > > I think that wou

Re: [one-users] Feature request: Locking of VM, images, nets...

On 11/05/2011 10:52, Luis M. Carril wrote: > I think that would be great if a set of locking commands to the > interface are implemented to avoid deleting the wrong virtual machine > due to a typing error. > > Something like: onevm lock vm_iddenys all operations one the > virtual machi

[one-users] Feature request: Locking of VM, images, nets...

Hi, I think that would be great if a set of locking commands to the interface are implemented to avoid deleting the wrong virtual machine due to a typing error. Something like: onevm lock vm_iddenys all operations one the virtual machine vm_id until a onevm unlock vm_id is done