Re: [one-users] Haven't authorized while using Java API
On 11/25/2012 10:33 PM, Giovanni Toraldo wrote: Hi Giovanni, Thanks you so much for your reply. if you instance Client without parameters, will be assumed to be at $ONE_AUTH, and the endpoint will be set to the environment variable $ONE_XMLRPC. I set the environment variable $ONE_AUTH and $ONE_XMLRPC when i managed private cloud. Here is the result in the command line: /root@cluster:~# echo $ONE_AUTH// ///var/lib/one/.one/one_auth// //root@cluster:~# echo $ONE_XMLRPC// //http://localhost:2633/RPC2// / You may want to instance Client with: Client client = new Client(oneadmin:password,http://localhost:2633/RPC2;); I tried your solution but i got the same error: /Client client = new Client(oneadmin:7f44b494160f2e69fed6c21b2ce555b8, http://localhost:2633/RPC2;);/ /Error message: [HostPoolInfo] User couldn't be authenticated, aborting call./ My password is correct because i used it to log on to SunStone Server successfully. When i entered http://localhost:2633/RPC2 address in the browser, it returned a message: Error 405 POST is the only HTTP method this server understands I don't know where i was wrong. Can you give me a hint to solve this problem? Thanks you in advance. -- Hoang Thai Xuan Khoa Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Haven't authorized while using Java API
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Hoàng Thái Xuân Khoa htxuank...@gmail.com wrote: Client client = new Client(oneadmin:7f44b494160f2e69fed6c21b2ce555b8, http://localhost:2633/RPC2;); This looks like an md5 hash, you should put your *real* password instead. -- Giovanni Toraldo http://gionn.net ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] failed to attached disk in KVM
I can not reproduce this problem in 3.8.1. Try to add DRIVER=raw to the image before attaching it. 2012/11/24 jd daniel ch juni...@gmail.com: Hello there, Scenario: OpenNebula 3.6+CentOS 6.3x86_64bit Issues: When I attached Disk (Type: Existing Image; Device prefix: sd) on my VM. Image created dev prefix is sd, target is sdb. Error log below when I attached the disk - Fri Nov 23 16:54:50 2012 [VMM][I]: Successfully execute transfer manager driver operation: tm_attach. Fri Nov 23 16:54:51 2012 [VMM][I]: Command execution fail: /var/tmp/one/vmm/kvm/attach_disk one-305 /var/lib/one//datastores/0/305/disk.2 sdb 1
Re: [one-users] Save As and Detach option
Hi Javier, Comments inline, El 23/11/12 11:08, Javier Fontan escribió: Image ownership can be changed by the hypervisor (kvm) when it is configured with dynamic_ownership=1. Is that the case? It didn't now it's fixed Are you using the same datastores for both tests, raw and qcow2? Yes, I'm using the same Save as marks a disk to be saved AFTER shutdown. So that is the normal way of working. In fact it will only be save if the VM is powered off using SHUTDOWN or CANCEL but not DELETE. The last test, when the image seems to ve saved but in fact it is not there, seems a bit more problematic. Can you please dig a bit in oned.log to check if there was something strange copying that file? With dynamic_ownership=1 save as create a new image entry with Source /var/lib/one/datastores/100/a3e076f377a855dc76f44ac373c9b0ca After shutdown owner and group are ok and in log: # grep -n5 a3e076f377a855dc76f44ac373c9b0ca /var/log/one/oned.log 426622-Mon Nov 26 14:06:42 2012 [ImM][I]: Creating disk at of 2216Mb (type: save_as) 426623-Mon Nov 26 14:06:42 2012 [ReM][D]: Req:1584 UID:10 VirtualMachineSaveDisk result SUCCESS, 25 426624-Mon Nov 26 14:06:42 2012 [ImG][D]: Message received: LOG I 25 ExitCode: 0 426625- 426626-Mon Nov 26 14:06:42 2012 [ImM][I]: ExitCode: 0 426627:Mon Nov 26 14:06:42 2012 [ImG][D]: Message received: MKFS SUCCESS 25 /var/lib/one/datastores/100/a3e076f377a855dc76f44ac373c9b0ca 426628- 426629-Mon Nov 26 14:06:42 2012 [ReM][D]: Req:4256 UID:10 VirtualMachineInfo invoked, 123 426630-Mon Nov 26 14:06:42 2012 [ReM][D]: Req:4256 UID:10 VirtualMachineInfo result SUCCESS, VMID123/IDUID... 426631-Mon Nov 26 14:06:44 2012 [ReM][D]: Req:3104 UID:2 VirtualNetworkPoolInfo invoked, -2, -1, -1 426632-Mon Nov 26 14:06:44 2012 [ReM][D]: Req:3104 UID:2 VirtualNetworkPoolInfo result SUCCESS, VNET_POOLVNETID... But file /var/lib/one/datastores/100/a3e076f377a855dc76f44ac373c9b0ca doesn't exist While in Sunstone new image appears as LOCKED After delete machine image state is showed as READY in Sunstone. In dom0 deployment dir and file are still present and disk files disk.0 and disk.1 have their user and group changed to root.root and image file doesn't exist A new file appears # file /var/lib/one/datastores/0/123/checkpoint /var/lib/one/datastores/0/123/checkpoint: data Also with root.root but 666 file permission and in this case directory and files of this machine are never deleted from running datastore Cheers, Roberto Cheers On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Roberto Rosende Dopazo rrose...@cesga.es wrote: Hi, I'm trying with OpenNebula 3.8 Save As and Detach option and I found some problems. With raw image: I start virtual machine, save changes from Sunstone and I saw that nothing happens until I press shutdown for that machine. Then system try an mv from deploy.0 file to main datastore, but it can't because when shutdown is pressed owner and group for deploy.0 are changed to root.root With qcow2 image: I start virtual machine, save changes from Sunstone and I saw that nothing happens until I press shutdown for that machine. Then I can see in Images section a new image with changes and in its information a Source tag with physical path in datastore. If I check that path file image doesn't exist but there is not any error, Sunstone show it as READY In this case owner and group of deploy.0 are not changed. Do you have any hint or documentation about that? Cheers, Roberto -- Roberto Rosende Dopazo CESGA Avda. de Vigo s/n. Campus Vida Tel.: (+34) 981569810, ext. 229 15705 - Santiago de Compostela SPAIN - Follow CESGA in Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/CESGA_ ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Opennebula on Slackware
There is OpenNebula installation on Slackware as my infrastructure contains this OS -- *Atenciosamente, Guilherme B. Guimarães* *Mestrando em Ciência da Computação - PPGCC/UFPA* *Especialista em desenvovilemento para Internet - UFPA Bacharel em Ciência da Computação - UNAMA * ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] New Tools to Get Started with OpenNebula
Dear users, Just a line to let you know that there is a new member in the OpenNebula Sandbox family. The newcomer is prepared to be run on top of ESX hypervisors http://opennebula.org/cloud:sandboxesx Hope you like it, -Tino -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open-Source Solution for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | @tinova79 | @OpenNebula On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Tino Vazquez tin...@opennebula.org wrote: Dear users, We are putting forward a set of efforts to ease the path for newcomers willing to try out OpenNebula [1]. For starters, we are creating a new set of OpenNebula Sandboxes that will enable users to launch a complete cloud in 5 minutes in their laptops, following a minimal set of steps. We have currently prepared KVM [2] and VirtualBox [3] Sandboxes, and an Amazon EC2 AMI is under way. We will be gradually shutdown the previous try out mechanisms, like the VMware and previous KVM Sandbox, as well as the demo public cloud. More information in the OpenNebula blog [4]. Best regards, The OpenNebula Team [1] http://opennebula.org/cloud:tryout [2] http://opennebula.org/cloud:sandboxkvm [3] http://opennebula.org/cloud:sandboxvirtualbox [4] http://blog.opennebula.org/?p=3794 -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open-Source Solution for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | @tinova79 | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Info noVNC
Dear ONE users,
It seems that noVNC and 3.8 are trendy topics these days :)
I've followed the troubleshooting section of noVNC in the doc, but I
can't access my VMs through it : VNC icon remains grey
- Template includes a GRAPHICS section :
GRAPHICS=[
LISTEN=0.0.0.0,
TYPE=VNC ]
- VMs created in 3.6 don't show anything in the logs, unlike the ones
created in 3.8 :
Mon Nov 26 22:59:31 2012 [VMM][I]: Generating deployment file:
/var/lib/one/224/deployment.0 Mon Nov 26 22:59:31 2012 [VMM][W]:
Graphics not supported or undefined, ignored.
- I checked the noVNC installation and found that numpy was missing, I
installed it and relaunched the novnc_install script
- I tried to launch the websockify command with oneadmin and I get the
following error :
oneadmin@inferno:/home/manager$ python
/usr/share/opennebula/websockify/websocketproxy.py
--target-config=/var/lib/one/sunstone_vnc_tokens
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/share/opennebula/websockify/websocketproxy.py, line 390,
in
websockify_init()
File /usr/share/opennebula/websockify/websocketproxy.py, line 364,
in websockify_init
if args[0].count(':') 0:
IndexError: list index out of range
I'm using KVM as hypervisor.
Any help on this ?
Thanks in advance
CyD
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] upgrade to latest from 1.4
Hello, I have a (very) old installation of several hundred VMs that are still being managed by ONE 1.4. Based on the docs I have seen I am assuming I need to upgrade to 2.x and then to 3.x from 2.x. Is this assumption correct and where can I download older versions of ONE? The ONE website only seems to have recent downloads available. Thank you. -- seth /\ sethdaniel.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Haven't authorized while using Java API
On 11/26/2012 4:47 PM, Giovanni Toraldo wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Hoàng Thái Xuân Khoa htxuank...@gmail.com wrote: Client client = new Client(oneadmin:7f44b494160f2e69fed6c21b2ce555b8, http://localhost:2633/RPC2;); This looks like an md5 hash, you should put your *real* password instead. -- Giovanni Toraldo http://gionn.net It's still didn't work. The 7f44b494160f2e69fed6c21b2ce555b8 is a default password when i installed OpenNebula. So, i don't know *real* password behind it. I decide use oneuser command to change oneadmin's password: oneadmin@cluster:~#oneuser passwd 0 123 with 0 is the id of oneadmin user and 123 is a new password. After that, i can use password 123 to logon to SunStone server, managed private cloud via command line successfully. But, when i used it in Java code, it's didn't work. Client client = new Client(oneadmin:123,http://localhost:2633/RPC2;); I got the same error: /Error message: [HostPoolInfo] User couldn't be authenticated, aborting call./ -- Hoang Thai Xuan Khoa Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Issues starting a VM
Hi all, Firstly I'll start by pointing out that I'm very new to OpenNebula, having grown used to just using plain shell scripts to fire up QEMU instances. My workplace is looking to use OpenNebula on a multi-node cluster for their server infrastructure. The machines are Intel Core i3 systems with Intel DQ77KB mainboards. The systems run Ubuntu 12.04 AMD64. The plan is to use the mainboard's two onboard network cards in LACP to facilitate high-speed data transfer between VMs for live migration and for distributed storage using Ceph, and a third PCI express card on a VLAN trunk port facing the network. Right now I'm testing on a single node, not one of the ones we'll eventually use but rather an older, former VMWare ESX box. The status: - Ubuntu 12.04 is installed. OpenNebula 3.8.1 packages installed from the OpenNebula website. - I have the switch port connected to eth0 set up as a VLAN trunk - I have /etc/network/interfaces set up to create the eth0.XXX devices for each VLAN, and sensibly named bridge devices, `brctl show` looks like this: root@bneprdvm0:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces client130 8000.00101814cb1b no eth0.130 project144 8000.00101814cb1b no eth0.144 project159 8000.00101814cb1b no eth0.159 server160 8000.00101814cb1b no eth0.160 This works fine with plain QEMU. Now, I've tried to create a virtual network to place a VM on the 'server160' bridge (i.e. I'd expect kvm to start; then it do a `brctl addif server160 tapX`). The following is my configuration for that network interface: oneadmin@bneprdvm0:~$ onevnet show 4 VIRTUAL NETWORK 4 INFORMATION ID : 4 NAME : Server 160 LAN USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin CLUSTER: - TYPE : FIXED BRIDGE : server160 VLAN : No PHYSICAL DEVICE: VLAN ID: USED LEASES: 0 PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- VIRTUAL NETWORK TEMPLATE FREE LEASES LEASE=[ IP=10.87.160.13, MAC=52:54:00:12:34:58, USED=0, VID=-1 ] The VM template looks like this: CPU=1.0 DISK=[ CLONE=NO, CLUSTER_ID=100, DATASTORE=default, DATASTORE_ID=1, DEV_PREFIX=hd, DISK_ID=0, IMAGE=bneprdsrv5-hda, IMAGE_ID=3, IMAGE_UNAME=vrtadmin, PERSISTENT=YES, READONLY=NO, SAVE=YES, SOURCE=/var/lib/one/datastores/1/301aac89561c0fbeaf140cb09124f941, TARGET=hda, TM_MAD=shared, TYPE=FILE ] MEMORY=256 NAME=bneprdsrv5 NIC=[ BRIDGE=project160, IP=10.87.160.13, MAC=52:54:00:12:34:58, NETWORK=server160, NETWORK_ID=2, NETWORK_UNAME=vrtadmin, PHYDEV=eth0.160, VLAN=YES ] REQUIREMENTS=CLUSTER_ID = 100 VMID=3 (Anyone know how to edit that by the way? So far all I seem to be able to do is blow away the VM configuration and rebuild from scratch!) I get the following error (apologies for the wall of text in advance): Tue Nov 27 17:09:35 2012 [LCM][I]: New VM state is BOOT Tue Nov 27 17:09:35 2012 [VMM][I]: Generating deployment file: /var/lib/one/3/deployment.0 Tue Nov 27 17:09:36 2012 [VMM][I]: Command execution fail: /var/tmp/one/vnm/802.1Q/pre PFZNPjxJRD4zPC9JRD48VUlEPj A8L1VJRD48R0lEPjA8L0dJRD48VU5BTUU+b25lYWRtaW48L1VOQU1FPjxHTkFNRT5vbmVhZG1pbjwvR05BTUU+PE5BTUU+Ym5lcHJkc3J2NTwvTkF NRT48UEVSTUlTU0lPTlM+PE9XTkVSX1U+MTwvT1dORVJfVT48T1dORVJfTT4xPC9PV05FUl9NPjxPV05FUl9BPjA8L09XTkVSX0E+PEdST1VQX1U+ MDwvR1JPVVBfVT48R1JPVVBfTT4wPC9HUk9VUF9NPjxHUk9VUF9BPjA8L0dST1VQX0E+PE9USEVSX1U+MDwvT1RIRVJfVT48T1RIRVJfTT4wPC9PV EhFUl9NPjxPVEhFUl9BPjA8L09USEVSX0E+PC9QRVJNSVNTSU9OUz48TEFTVF9QT0xMPjA8L0xBU1RfUE9MTD48U1RBVEU+MzwvU1RBVEU+PExDTV 9TVEFURT4yPC9MQ01fU1RBVEU+PFJFU0NIRUQ+MDwvUkVTQ0hFRD48U1RJTUU+MTM1NDAwMDE1NjwvU1RJTUU+PEVUSU1FPjA8L0VUSU1FPjxERVB MT1lfSUQvPjxNRU1PUlk+MDwvTUVNT1JZPjxDUFU+MDwvQ1BVPjxORVRfVFg+MDwvTkVUX1RYPjxORVRfUlg+MDwvTkVUX1JYPjxURU1QTEFURT48 Q1BVPjwhW0NEQVRBWzEuMF1dPjwvQ1BVPjxESVNLPjxDTE9ORT48IVtDREFUQVtOT11dPjwvQ0xPTkU+PENMVVNURVJfSUQ+PCFbQ0RBVEFbMTAwX V0+PC9DTFVTVEVSX0lEPjxEQVRBU1RPUkU+PCFbQ0RBVEFbZGVmYXVsdF1dPjwvREFUQVNUT1JFPjxEQVRBU1RPUkVfSUQ+PCFbQ0RBVEFbMV1dPj wvREFUQVNUT1JFX0lEPjxERVZfUFJFRklYPjwhW0NEQVRBW2hkXV0+PC9ERVZfUFJFRklYPjxESVNLX0lEPjwhW0NEQVRBWzBdXT48L0RJU0tfSUQ +PElNQUdFPjwhW0NEQVRBW2JuZXByZHNydjUtaGRhXV0+PC9JTUFHRT48SU1BR0VfSUQ+PCFbQ0RBVEFbM11dPjwvSU1BR0VfSUQ+PElNQUdFX1VO
