[one-users] OpenNebula 3.2 Strange behavior of chown
Hi, I have built OpenNebula 3.2 on CentOS 5.7(x86_64) from opennebula-3.2.0.tar.gz according to documentation [1],[2]. And I am using ruby-1.9.3-p0 built from source instead of CentOS 5.7 RPM. I have changed image and network resource's owner from oneadmin to user testuser once, and brought back owner to oneadmin. But now, testuser still can use those resources. 1. for example, I have following image and network: (image) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage list ID USER GROUP NAME SIZE TYPE REGTIME PER STAT RVMS 0 oneadmin oneadmin test 5G OS 01/25 14:08:37 No rdy 0 (network) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet list ID USER GROUP NAME TYPE BRIDGE LEASES 1 oneadmin oneadmin defaultpriv R br0 0 2. change owner from oneadmin to someone (here, testuser): (image) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage chown 0 testuser [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage list ID USER GROUP NAME SIZE TYPE REGTIME PER STAT RVMS 0 testuser oneadmin test 5G OS 01/25 14:08:37 No rdy 0 [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage show 0 IMAGE 0 INFORMATION ID : 0 NAME : test USER : testuser GROUP : oneadmin ... PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- ... (network) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet chown 1 testuser [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet list ID USER GROUP NAME TYPE BRIDGE LEASES 1 testuser oneadmin defaultpriv R br0 0 [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet show 1 VIRTUAL NETWORK 1 INFORMATION ID : 1 NAME : defaultpriv USER : testuser GROUP : oneadmin ... PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- 3. Bring back owner to oneadmin: (image) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage chown 0 oneadmin [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage list ID USER GROUP NAME SIZE TYPE REGTIME PER STAT RVMS 0 oneadmin oneadmin test 5G OS 01/25 14:08:37 No rdy 0 [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage show 0 IMAGE 0 INFORMATION ID : 0 NAME : test USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin ... PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- ... (network) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet chown 1 oneadmin [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet list ID USER GROUP NAME TYPE BRIDGE LEASES 1 oneadmin oneadmin defaultpriv R br0 0 [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet show 1 VIRTUAL NETWORK 1 INFORMATION ID : 1 NAME : defaultpriv USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin ... PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- ... 4. testuser still can use image and network by resource's NAME(not ID). [ascadm@frontend]% cat ~/.one/one_auth testuser: [ascadm@frontend]% oneuser list ID GROUP NAME AUTH PASSWORD 2 users testuser core [ascadm@frontend]% cat default.one NAME = default CPU = 8 VCPU = 8 MEMORY = 22528 OS = [ boot = hd, arch = x86_64 ] DISK = [ IMAGE = test, BUS = virtio ] NIC = [ NETWORK = defaultpriv, model = virtio ] [ascadm@frontend]% onevnet list ID USER GROUP NAME TYPE BRIDGE LEASES [ascadm@frontend]% oneimage list ID USER GROUP NAME SIZE TYPE REGTIME PER STAT RVMS [ascadm@frontend]% onevm create default.one ID: 8 [ascadm@frontend]% onevm list ID USER GROUP NAME STAT CPU MEM HOSTNAME TIME 8 testuser users default runn 0 0K asccmp054 00 00:03:10 It seems that resource's owner backs to testuser temporarily. [ascadm@frontend]% onevnet list ID USER GROUP NAME TYPE BRIDGE LEASES 1 testuser oneadmin defaultpriv R br0 3 [ascadm@frontend]% oneimage list ID USER GROUP NAME SIZE TYPE REGTIME PER STAT RVMS 0 testuser oneadmin test 5G OS 01/25 14:08:37 No used 3 DB backend is sqlite. Is this chown issue? [1] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.2:compile [2] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.2:build_deps Thanks, -- Akihiko Ota ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] OpenNebula CloudWorkshop Romania Timișoara
Hello Community, My name is Valentin Bud. I have started using OpenNebula a few months ago. I thank you for this great you are developing. Words cannot really express gratitude. I have been playing with OpenNebula until now, no production deployments but those are about to follow really soon. I like the tool because it gives you flexibility. What I love about it is that I can do a lot of things using shell scripts. In 16.02 February I am going to host a CloudWorkshop for the local business and student communities. In the first part of the Workshop I am going to talk about the Cloud from a business perspective and how could the Cloud help small companies or startups. The second part is dedicated to the students from the local technical university Universitatea Politehnica Timișoara. I am about to build an email Cloud using OpenNebula for my personal use, and present OpenNebula and the email Cloud as a case study. This workshop is the first from a series that I want to make around Romania in cities were are the most recognized technical universities, cities like Cluj, Iași, București. Cloud Computing is the future and I want to promote this concept throughout Romania so we don't remain behind on this. In cities were are technical universities is a concentration of creative and innovative minds among the students. Why am I telling you all this? As an appreciation for the work this community has put into OpenNebula. If I am going to use OpenNebula you should know about it. It is you, the community, who made this possible. I don't want to make marketing on this mailing lists, and if I am crossing the line with this please remove the message, but the event has a facebook page at the following link - https://www.facebook.com/pages/CloudWorkshop/137624213023654. The page is in Romanian though. Have a wonderful day people, -- w: http://databus.ro/blog in: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/valentin-bud/9/881/830 t: https://twitter.com/valentinbud ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] mandriva linux and opennebula
2012/1/25 Robert Schweikert rjsch...@suse.com Hi, On 01/24/2012 05:58 PM, Alexander Khryukin wrote: Hi. I'm trying to add opennebula into mandriva linux. Packages already done, and opennebula can be installed in cooker branch (it is development and testing) but i have error with systemd service and /usr/bin/oned I've posted .service files to this list recently. If you search the archives you should find them. The files work on openSUSE 12.1 and should work with Mandriva. You can also take a look at the Virtualization:Cloud:**OpenNebula project in OBS (openSUSE build service) HTH, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX Tech Lead rjsch...@suse.com rschw...@ca.ibm.com 781-464-8147 __**_ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/**listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.**orghttp://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org Yeah, you right. Problem was in i forgot start one_scheduler.service. But now i have other issue. sudo systemctl start one_scheduler.service wait about 2 minutes A dependency job failed. See system logs for details and in log drops messages that All modules finalized, exiting. http://pastie.org/3248831 Why exiting? also when service starts i see in htop a lot of oned processes. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] authentication issue
Hello Robert, what I meant is that what Olivier reported was specific to the OpenNebula 3.0 Debian package, and since we fixed it during the development of OpenNebula 3.2, it's not an issue any more with the package we've generated for OpenNebula 3.2 and it certainly doesn't affect the openSUSE packages. It's true that there has been a lot of involvement from the community to polish some non-critical issues, especially related to the user interfaces, so in this case we will publish a maintainance release in a few days. Thanks a lot for your work, and let us know if you need some help. Regards, Jaime On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Robert Schweikert rjsch...@suse.comwrote: On 01/24/2012 08:39 AM, Jaime Melis wrote: Hi, we have changed the way this works for the 3.2 package. Is this still an issue? Hmm, if you are fixing package, will there be a 3.2.x release soon with fixes included? I have 3.2 building in OBS (openSUSE build service). But because of all the reported problems right after the release I have not pushed this build from the :Testing project to the main project Virtualization:Cloud:** OpenNebula. A bit of guidance is appreciated. Thanks, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX Tech Lead rjsch...@suse.com rschw...@ca.ibm.com 781-464-8147 __**_ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/**listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.**orghttp://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] ttylinux acpi
Javier, thank for your response. But I try other images with apci properties, and when I say to vm to shutdown it is poweroff. Without acpi properties the vm doesn't poweroff, and it is kept running. -- Atenciosamente, Paulo Renato Administrador de Redes Guarda Municipal de Fortaleza Em 24 de janeiro de 2012 12:32, Javier Fontan jfon...@opennebula.orgescreveu: I don't know of acpi packages for ttylinux but it you are using kvm and don't need to proper shutdown the machine, that is, shutdown = unplug the machine, you can just set FEATURES=[ ACPI=no ] In the VM template or in /etc/one/vmm_exec/vmm_exec_kvm.conf (so it becomes default for every VM that does not specify it) On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Paulo Renato paulore...@gmail.com wrote: hi, I need use a ttylinux image for an experiment cause it is very, very small but I also need the acpi capabilities enable for my experiment. I try install manually using pacman package manager, but it doesn't work. Thanks for your help. -- Atenciosamente, Paulo Renato Administrador de Redes Guarda Municipal de Fortaleza ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Javier Fontán Muiños Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | jfon...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Atenciosamente, Paulo Renato Administrador de Redes Guarda Municipal de Fortaleza ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] one 3.2: VLAN inside VM definition template
I know it is possible to add a NIC to a VM only with only the IP, MAC and BRIDGE name, but is it possible to add a NIC only with IP, MAC; PHYDEV, VLAN_ID and VLAN? On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Florian Antonescu florinantone...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I would like to know if it is possible to add a NIC to VM definition with a VLAN, without using a previously defined virtual network, similar to the attached one: NIC=[ IP=192.168.122.5, MAC=02:00:c0:a8:7a:05, PHYDEV=eth0, VLAN=YES, VLAN_ID=3 ] Thank you, Florian Antonescu ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] oneacctd crashes (opennebula 3.2)
I would just like to add that we too had the exact same problem with acctd after upgrading to 3.2. Have been running the patch for a while and it seems to fix the problem. oneacctd has not crashed again. Thanks for the patch! --- Håkan Isaksson On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:41:37 +0100, Daniel Molina wrote: Hi Olivier, On 23 January 2012 17:30, Olivier Sallou olivier.sal...@irisa.fr wrote: Le 1/23/12 12:14 PM, Olivier Sallou a écrit : Le 1/23/12 11:16 AM, Daniel Molina a écrit : Hi Rolandas and Olivier, On 23 January 2012 09:44, Olivier Sallou olivier.sal...@irisa.fr wrote: Le 1/22/12 2:02 PM, Rolandas Naujikas a écrit : Hi, oneacctd crashes periodically (after restart). I face same issue on one 3.0 I think this problem is related to virtual machines on pending state. I think at this moment I had a VM in shutdown state (the only one in fact) As additional info, I continue to face the issue several times a day, with no VM running I have uploaded a patch, would you mind to try if it works? I found out that there was a problem when trying to insert VMs in DONE state with no history, for example VMs that are created and deleted (and not deployed) in the same accounting step. http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/1080 The patch included in the ticket should fix the problem Thanks for your feedback /var/log/one/oneacctd.log: Sun Jan 22 12:55:56 +0200 2012 OneWatch::VmMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:00:56 +0200 2012 OneWatch::VmMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:05:56 +0200 2012 OneWatch::VmMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:05:56 +0200 2012 OneWatch::HostMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:10:56 +0200 2012 OneWatch::VmMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:15:56 +0200 2012 OneWatch::VmMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:20:56 +0200 2012 OneWatch::VmMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:20:56 +0200 2012 OneWatch::HostMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:25:56 +0200 2012 OneWatch::VmMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:30:56 +0200 2012 OneWatch::VmMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:35:57 +0200 2012 OneWatch::VmMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:35:57 +0200 2012 OneWatch::HostMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:40:57 +0200 2012 OneWatch::VmMonitoring Sun Jan 22 13:40:57 +0200 2012 OneWatch::Accounting /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/accounting.rb:98:in `update_history': undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/accounting.rb:126:in `insert_vm' from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/accounting.rb:68:in `insert' from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/accounting.rb:67:in `each' from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/accounting.rb:67:in `insert' from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/acctd.rb:77:in `update' from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/acctd.rb:59:in `each' from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/acctd.rb:59:in `update' from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/acctd.rb:57:in `each' from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/acctd.rb:57:in `update' from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/acctd.rb:129 from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/acctd.rb:124:in `loop' from /usr/lib/one/ruby/acct/acctd.rb:124 Configuration uses mysql as DB and default other parameters as in opennebula 3.2 distribution. In opennebula 3.0 it was more stable. Regards, Rolandas ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Olivier Sallou IRISA / University of Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (pgp.mit.edu) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Olivier Sallou IRISA / University of Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (pgp.mit.edu) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] OpenNebula 3.2 Strange behavior of chown
Hi Akihiko, Thanks for your great feedback and your step by step instructions to reproduce the bug. This is now solved in the repo, see [1]. Cheers! [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/1087 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebulacmar...@opennebula.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Akihiko Ota skywalker.3...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I have built OpenNebula 3.2 on CentOS 5.7(x86_64) from opennebula-3.2.0.tar.gz according to documentation [1],[2]. And I am using ruby-1.9.3-p0 built from source instead of CentOS 5.7 RPM. I have changed image and network resource's owner from oneadmin to user testuser once, and brought back owner to oneadmin. But now, testuser still can use those resources. 1. for example, I have following image and network: (image) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage list ID USER GROUPNAMESIZE TYPE REGTIME PER STAT RVMS 0 oneadmin oneadmin test 5G OS 01/25 14:08:37 No rdy 0 (network) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet list ID USER GROUPNAME TYPE BRIDGE LEASES 1 oneadmin oneadmin defaultpriv Rbr0 0 2. change owner from oneadmin to someone (here, testuser): (image) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage chown 0 testuser [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage list ID USER GROUPNAMESIZE TYPE REGTIME PER STAT RVMS 0 testuser oneadmin test 5G OS 01/25 14:08:37 No rdy 0 [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage show 0 IMAGE 0 INFORMATION ID : 0 NAME : test USER : testuser GROUP : oneadmin ... PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- ... (network) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet chown 1 testuser [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet list ID USER GROUPNAME TYPE BRIDGE LEASES 1 testuser oneadmin defaultpriv Rbr0 0 [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet show 1 VIRTUAL NETWORK 1 INFORMATION ID : 1 NAME : defaultpriv USER : testuser GROUP : oneadmin ... PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- 3. Bring back owner to oneadmin: (image) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage chown 0 oneadmin [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage list ID USER GROUPNAMESIZE TYPE REGTIME PER STAT RVMS 0 oneadmin oneadmin test 5G OS 01/25 14:08:37 No rdy 0 [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ oneimage show 0 IMAGE 0 INFORMATION ID : 0 NAME : test USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin ... PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- ... (network) [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet chown 1 oneadmin [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet list ID USER GROUPNAME TYPE BRIDGE LEASES 1 oneadmin oneadmin defaultpriv Rbr0 0 [oneadmin@frontend ~]$ onevnet show 1 VIRTUAL NETWORK 1 INFORMATION ID : 1 NAME : defaultpriv USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin ... PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- ... 4. testuser still can use image and network by resource's NAME(not ID). [ascadm@frontend]% cat ~/.one/one_auth testuser: [ascadm@frontend]% oneuser list ID GROUPNAMEAUTH PASSWORD 2 userstestusercore [ascadm@frontend]% cat default.one NAME = default CPU= 8 VCPU = 8 MEMORY = 22528 OS = [ boot = hd, arch = x86_64 ] DISK = [ IMAGE = test, BUS = virtio ] NIC= [ NETWORK = defaultpriv, model = virtio ] [ascadm@frontend]% onevnet list ID USER GROUPNAME TYPE BRIDGE LEASES [ascadm@frontend]% oneimage list ID USER GROUPNAMESIZE TYPE REGTIME PER STAT RVMS [ascadm@frontend]% onevm create default.one ID: 8 [ascadm@frontend]% onevm list ID USER GROUPNAME STAT CPU MEMHOSTNAME TIME 8 testuser usersdefault runn 0 0K asccmp054 00 00:03:10 It seems that resource's owner backs to testuser temporarily. [ascadm@frontend]% onevnet list ID USER GROUPNAME TYPE BRIDGE LEASES 1 testuser oneadmin defaultpriv Rbr0 3 [ascadm@frontend]% oneimage list ID USER GROUPNAMESIZE TYPE REGTIME PER STAT RVMS 0 testuser oneadmin test 5G OS 01/25 14:08:37 No used 3 DB backend is sqlite. Is this chown issue? [1] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.2:compile [2] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.2:build_deps Thanks, -- Akihiko Ota
[one-users] OpenNebula Public Cloud Updated to 3.2
Dear Community, The OpenNebula Public Cloud [1] has been migrated to the last OpenNebula version, 3.2. If you have an account you can still use your old username and password. If not, request a new account [2] and check out the new OpenNebula 3.2 features. These interfaces will show you the regular user view of the Cloud, but you will not be able to manage ACLs, hosts, groups nor users, since that will be delegated to the oneadmin group. [1] http://www.opennebula.org/cloud:cloud [2] http://www.opennebula.org/cloud:gettingaccount POST: http://blog.opennebula.org/?p=2459 Cheers. -- Daniel Molina Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | dmol...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Remus support
http://www.firmaadams.pl http://www.firmaadams.pl/ http://www.firmaadams.pl Hi everyone We are planning to virtualize our small data center. I'm thinking about Xen and OpenNebula. I know that since version 4.0 of Xen is possible to have Vmware Fault Tolerance like feature. It's called Remus. Is OpenNebula support remus configuration and management? Is here any other web, gui management software for Xen farm with support of HA and Remus? Best Regards -- Mateusz Blaszka IT Department d...@firmaadams.pl tel. (61) 650-78-20 _ Czy musisz drukować tę wiadomość? Pomyśl o środowisku. SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT Uwaga: Wiadomość jest przeznaczona tylko dla jej adresata. Dostęp osób trzecich do tej wiadomości jest zabroniony. Jeśli nie jest Pan/i adresatem niniejszej wiadomości, informujemy, że jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie lub inne działanie o podobnym charakterze jest zabronione i może być nielegalne. Prosimy o poinformowanie nadawcy oraz usunięcie wiadomości bez otwierania załączników. Attention: This email is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Should you receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without opening the attachments. Firma Adam's Adam Skrzyniarz 62-081 Baranowo, ul. Nowina 20 tel. (061) 650-78-20 NIP: 777-101-39-55 e-mail: mailto:i...@firmaadams.pl i...@firmaadams.pl image001.gifimage002.gif___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
