Re: [one-users] oneacct: accounting information not correct?
Hi Dirk, You are right, the NET values are not accumulated and their value are the aggregation of the last 300 * 5 ms: start_time = Time.now - 300 * 5 This is obviously wrong, please open a ticket and we will fix it for the upcoming release. Thanks a lot for the feedback! -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 29 January 2014 11:09, Daems Dirk dirk.da...@vito.be wrote: Hi, Looking at the vm_monitoring table in sqlite, it becomes clear that the NET_RX and NET_TX values reported by oneacct are not accumulated. Only the most recent value is shown for the filtered dataset. Should I file a ticket describing my findings? Regards, Dirk From: Daems Dirk Sent: dinsdag 28 januari 2014 10:11 To: 'users@lists.opennebula.org' Subject: oneacct: accounting information not correct? Hi, I use OpenNebula 4.2 with a VMWare hypervisor (v 5.1.0). I am experimenting with the oneacct accounting tool. It looks like the network consumption in my setup is not correctly monitored. I sent a file of 2.4 GB to my VM with ID 52. After uploading the file, oneacct only reports 794.1K of received bytes. When I execute the command a couple of second later, the NET_RX property only shows 0.1K of bytes received. If I understand the documentation correct [1], the amount of received bytes should be accumulated for a history record. [1] - http://docs.opennebula.org/stable/administration/users_and_groups/accounting.html -bash-4.1$ oneacct -u 2 -s '01/27/2014' -e '01/29/2014' Showing active history records from Mon Jan 27 00:00:00 +0100 2014 to Wed Jan 29 00:00:00 +0100 2014 # User 2 VID HOSTNAMEACTION REAS START_TIME END_TIME MEMORY CPU NET_RX NET_TX 52 devmesx1.intern none none 01/27 17:26:18 - 2G 2 794.1K 0K -bash-4.1$ -bash-4.1$ -bash-4.1$ oneacct -u 2 -s '01/27/2014' -e '01/29/2014' Showing active history records from Mon Jan 27 00:00:00 +0100 2014 to Wed Jan 29 00:00:00 +0100 2014 # User 2 VID HOSTNAMEACTION REAS START_TIME END_TIME MEMORY CPU NET_RX NET_TX 52 devmesx1.intern none none 01/27 17:26:18 - 2G 2 0.1K 0K Did anyone experience similar problems or could this be due to incorrect setup? Thanks, Dirk VITO Disclaimer: http://www.vito.be/e-maildisclaimer ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] oneacct: accounting information not correct?
Hi Tino, Ticket was logged: http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2688 I also noticed that the value of the NET_TX element in the vm_monitoring table is always zero bytes, which causes the value in the oneacct output to be zero as well of course. Looks like this is not related to the oneacct tool but rather to the VMware network driver? Is this a known issue? Regards, Dirk -Original Message- From: Tino Vazquez [mailto:cvazq...@c12g.com] Sent: woensdag 29 januari 2014 11:14 To: Daems Dirk Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: Re: [one-users] oneacct: accounting information not correct? Hi Dirk, You are right, the NET values are not accumulated and their value are the aggregation of the last 300 * 5 ms: start_time = Time.now - 300 * 5 This is obviously wrong, please open a ticket and we will fix it for the upcoming release. Thanks a lot for the feedback! -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 29 January 2014 11:09, Daems Dirk dirk.da...@vito.be wrote: Hi, Looking at the vm_monitoring table in sqlite, it becomes clear that the NET_RX and NET_TX values reported by oneacct are not accumulated. Only the most recent value is shown for the filtered dataset. Should I file a ticket describing my findings? Regards, Dirk From: Daems Dirk Sent: dinsdag 28 januari 2014 10:11 To: 'users@lists.opennebula.org' Subject: oneacct: accounting information not correct? Hi, I use OpenNebula 4.2 with a VMWare hypervisor (v 5.1.0). I am experimenting with the oneacct accounting tool. It looks like the network consumption in my setup is not correctly monitored. I sent a file of 2.4 GB to my VM with ID 52. After uploading the file, oneacct only reports 794.1K of received bytes. When I execute the command a couple of second later, the NET_RX property only shows 0.1K of bytes received. If I understand the documentation correct [1], the amount of received bytes should be accumulated for a history record. [1] - http://docs.opennebula.org/stable/administration/users_and_groups/acco unting.html -bash-4.1$ oneacct -u 2 -s '01/27/2014' -e '01/29/2014' Showing active history records from Mon Jan 27 00:00:00 +0100 2014 to Wed Jan 29 00:00:00 +0100 2014 # User 2 VID HOSTNAMEACTION REAS START_TIME END_TIME MEMORY CPU NET_RX NET_TX 52 devmesx1.intern none none 01/27 17:26:18 - 2G 2 794.1K 0K -bash-4.1$ -bash-4.1$ -bash-4.1$ oneacct -u 2 -s '01/27/2014' -e '01/29/2014' Showing active history records from Mon Jan 27 00:00:00 +0100 2014 to Wed Jan 29 00:00:00 +0100 2014 # User 2 VID HOSTNAMEACTION REAS START_TIME END_TIME MEMORY CPU NET_RX NET_TX 52 devmesx1.intern none none 01/27 17:26:18 - 2G 2 0.1K 0K Did anyone experience similar problems or could this be due to incorrect setup? Thanks, Dirk VITO Disclaimer: http://www.vito.be/e-maildisclaimer ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org VITO Disclaimer: http://www.vito.be/e-maildisclaimer ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] oneacct: accounting information not correct?
Hi Dirk, Thanks a lot for opening the issue. I wasn't aware of the NET_TX value always being 0 at the table, could you please add that as a comment? We'll tackle all of this together for next release. Cheers, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 29 January 2014 11:31, Daems Dirk dirk.da...@vito.be wrote: Hi Tino, Ticket was logged: http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2688 I also noticed that the value of the NET_TX element in the vm_monitoring table is always zero bytes, which causes the value in the oneacct output to be zero as well of course. Looks like this is not related to the oneacct tool but rather to the VMware network driver? Is this a known issue? Regards, Dirk -Original Message- From: Tino Vazquez [mailto:cvazq...@c12g.com] Sent: woensdag 29 januari 2014 11:14 To: Daems Dirk Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: Re: [one-users] oneacct: accounting information not correct? Hi Dirk, You are right, the NET values are not accumulated and their value are the aggregation of the last 300 * 5 ms: start_time = Time.now - 300 * 5 This is obviously wrong, please open a ticket and we will fix it for the upcoming release. Thanks a lot for the feedback! -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 29 January 2014 11:09, Daems Dirk dirk.da...@vito.be wrote: Hi, Looking at the vm_monitoring table in sqlite, it becomes clear that the NET_RX and NET_TX values reported by oneacct are not accumulated. Only the most recent value is shown for the filtered dataset. Should I file a ticket describing my findings? Regards, Dirk From: Daems Dirk Sent: dinsdag 28 januari 2014 10:11 To: 'users@lists.opennebula.org' Subject: oneacct: accounting information not correct? Hi, I use OpenNebula 4.2 with a VMWare hypervisor (v 5.1.0). I am experimenting with the oneacct accounting tool. It looks like the network consumption in my setup is not correctly monitored. I sent a file of 2.4 GB to my VM with ID 52. After uploading the file, oneacct only reports 794.1K of received bytes. When I execute the command a couple of second later, the NET_RX property only shows 0.1K of bytes received. If I understand the documentation correct [1], the amount of received bytes should be accumulated for a history record. [1] - http://docs.opennebula.org/stable/administration/users_and_groups/acco unting.html -bash-4.1$ oneacct -u 2 -s '01/27/2014' -e '01/29/2014' Showing active history records from Mon Jan 27 00:00:00 +0100 2014 to Wed Jan 29 00:00:00 +0100 2014 # User 2 VID HOSTNAMEACTION REAS START_TIME END_TIME MEMORY CPU NET_RX NET_TX 52 devmesx1.intern none none 01/27 17:26:18 - 2G 2 794.1K 0K -bash-4.1$ -bash-4.1$ -bash-4.1$ oneacct -u 2 -s '01/27/2014' -e '01/29/2014' Showing active history records from Mon Jan 27 00:00:00 +0100 2014 to Wed Jan 29 00:00:00 +0100 2014 # User 2 VID HOSTNAMEACTION REAS START_TIME END_TIME MEMORY CPU NET_RX NET_TX 52 devmesx1.intern none none 01/27 17:26:18 - 2G 2 0.1K 0K Did anyone experience similar problems or could this be due to incorrect
Re: [one-users] HA hook and -p n flag
Hi Igor, I've opened a ticket [1] to keep track of the solution for next releases. Thanks for the feedback, -Tino [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2689 -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 24 January 2014 12:00, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Dear Igor, This looks like a bug indeed. Could you try changing /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb, line 98, from: monitor_interval = line.split(=).last.to_i if /HOST_MONITORING_INTERVAL/=~line to monitor_interval = line.split(=).last.to_i if /MONITORING_INTERVAL/=~line and try again. If this works, please let us know so we can include a fix for 4.6 Regards, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Igor Laskovy igor.lask...@gmail.com wrote: Is this a bug? If so, please give it High priority. Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 Command execution fail: /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb 9 -r -p 3 Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb:101:in `*': nil can't be coerced into Fixnum (TypeError) Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 from /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb:101 Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 ExitCode: 1 Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: EXECUTE FAILURE 9 error: - -- Igor Laskovy facebook.com/igor.laskovy studiogrizzly.com ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Closing OpenNebula 4.4 Cycle, Planning for 4.6
Hi Shankhadeep, We've evaluated the request and it looks like something that can make it for 4.6. I've opened a ticket to keep track [1]. Regards, -Tino [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2690 -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 23 January 2014 11:20, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Hi Shankhadeep, We've already closed the roadmap for 4.6, but please consider open a feature request in dev.opennebula.org and we'll do our best to include it for the next release. Best regards, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Shankhadeep Shome shank15...@gmail.com wrote: Could you guys consider pulling in the hyper-v libvirt tag support for sunstone that one of users contributed a patch for few weeks back? Anything that improves Windows guest performance on kvm is very much appreciated, at least by me hyperv relaxed state='on'/ vapic state='on'/ spinlocks state='on' retries='4096'/ /hyperv On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Ruben S. Montero rsmont...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi First, we'd like to thank you all the comments and feedback for OpenNebula 4.6. We really appreciate it :) Our goal for 4.6 is two-fold: improve federation module (aka ozones) and improve OpenNebula usability (based on OpenNebula user comments received during the last releases). It's been always difficult to prioritize the new features considering the limited time-frame of a release, so we tried to balance the effort and number of features. The complete list of features is here [1]. About the specific requests in this thread. In 4.6, We are going for: - #2568 Support for RBD Format 2 images - #1727 Patch for one.image.resize to resize image - #1818 Support for IP reservations along with #2545 Decorrelate networks TYPE and IP management - #1696 Add the ability to select datastore for Clone operation as a previous step for #2417 Move images between datastores. #2417 requires preserving the ID, so let see if we can easily get both - #2453 Add hostname configuration to contexualization - #2048. Instantiate to persistent - #2648: ACL edit/view wizard - #2649: sunstone, occi, econe, novncserver ability to log to syslog server These issues have been moved to the backlog, with a high priority to consider them for 4.8, complete backlog [2]: - oneacct extended to the webinterface. This is issue #1607, in this release we are going for #1484 (output in csv format of accounting data) - over-committing memory (ram) to VMs just like how you can set over commit in CPU. This is issue #1328 - One feature I would like to see would be a recycle bin this has been merge with #2412 Ability to lock VM from accidental actions - #2560 Re-read oned.conf on reload - #2651 Implement mailbox to prevent vm from running twice. Again thanks for the feedback. Cheers PS: A more prosaic form of this mail has been published in the blog [3] [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/projects/opennebula/issues?query_id=45 [2] http://dev.opennebula.org/projects/opennebula/issues?query_id=46 [3] http://opennebula.org/blueprints-for-opennebula-4-6/ On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Karsten Nielsen kars...@unity3d.com wrote: Hi, I would like to have support for docker.io that would be
[one-users] CentOS Dojo Hackathon
Dear all, as I mentioned some days ago in the list, OpenNebula will participate in the upcoming CentOS Dojo: http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2014 We have a bit more information with regard to this. The hackathon will start shortly after lunch, at 14:15, and we will take upon us to improve the following points in OpenNebula / CentOS: - CloudInit 0.7.5 support - Systemd scripts for CentOS 7 - opennebula-node-xen package If you are interested please join us (even remotely!), any help will be highly appreciated! cheers, Jaime -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Package repositories and OpenNebula tutorial
Hi, I understood that Opennebula repositories would be maintained but it does not seem so as deb http://opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/12.04 stable opennebula it not available. Any idea why? Thanks Poul 2013-08-26 Javier Fontan jfon...@opennebula.org Hi, We have recently created package repositories for CentOS 6, Ubuntu 12.04/13.04, Debian 7 and openSUSE 12.3. You have more information on how to setup them at: http://blog.opennebula.org/?p=4992 We will maintain those repositories updated with the latest stable release. As a side note we are happy to announce an OpenNebula tutorial that will be held the day before the OpenNebulaConf. It comes free for the conference attendees so plan your trip with that in mind. http://opennebulaconf.com/2013/08/free-opennebula-tutorial-at-opennebulaconf-2013/ Cheers -- Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 in Berlin from the 24th to the 26th of September 2013! Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] CentOS Dojo Hackathon
For those of us who can't make it to Brussels, it would be interesting to hear if there have been any changes in OpenNebula on CentOS that have come about because of the new affiliation of Centos and Red Hat. In particular, might there now be a path to get OpenNebula and some of the other packages that have been CentOS-only in to Red Hat Enterprise Linux? Steve Timm On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Jaime Melis wrote: Dear all, as I mentioned some days ago in the list, OpenNebula will participate in the upcoming CentOS Dojo: http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2014 We have a bit more information with regard to this. The hackathon will start shortly after lunch, at 14:15, and we will take upon us to improve the following points in OpenNebula / CentOS: - CloudInit 0.7.5 support - Systemd scripts for CentOS 7 - opennebula-node-xen package If you are interested please join us (even remotely!), any help will be highly appreciated! cheers, Jaime -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org -- Steven C. Timm, Ph.D (630) 840-8525 t...@fnal.gov http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/ Fermilab Scientific Computing Division, Scientific Computing Services Quad. Grid and Cloud Services Dept., Associate Dept. Head for Cloud Computing___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] libvirt/kvm: Permission denied on PERSISTENT images
Hello, Using ONE 4.2 on Debian wheezy. I just upgrade the qemu and libvirt to wheezy backports to solve bad interaction between emulated card and guest kernel[1]. Now I can not boot VMs with PERSISTENT images. I found a thread[2] on the mailing-list which looked like my problem, I made the checks without success. My environment: --- OS: Debian Wheezy qemu-kvm: 1.7.0+dfsg-2~bpo70+2 libvirt-bin: 1.2.1-1~bpo70+1 ONE: 4.2, from OpenNebula deb packages Datastores: - 0: local disk of each host - 1: NFS TM_MAD=qcow2 Test 1: --- IMAGE_ID=114 PERSISTENT=NO The VM boots fine Test 2: --- IMAGE_ID=114 PERSISTENT=YES The VM FAILED. The only difference is the use of a symlink, does someone know any issue with libvirt/qemu to use disk images though symlink? Regards. oneadmin@nebula:~$ cat vms/1937/transfer.0.prolog LN qcow2 benjamin:/var/lib/one/datastores/1/5d2be6f9746fc3447be11c6621da87df igor:/var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.0 1937 1 CONTEXT ssh /var/lib/one/vms/1937/context.sh igor:/var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.1 1937 0 oneadmin@nebula:~$ cat vms/1937/deployment.0 domain type='kvm' xmlns:qemu='http://libvirt.org/schemas/domain/qemu/1.0' nameone-1937/name vcpu1/vcpu cputune shares21/shares /cputune memory524288/memory os type arch='x86_64'hvm/type boot dev='hd'/ /os devices emulator/usr/bin/kvm/emulator disk type='file' device='disk' source file='/var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.0'/ target dev='vda'/ driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='writeback'/ /disk disk type='file' device='cdrom' source file='/var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.1'/ target dev='hda'/ readonly/ driver name='qemu' type='raw'/ /disk interface type='bridge' source bridge='vsw'/ virtualport type='openvswitch'/ mac address='02:00:0a:00:2a:0e'/ model type='virtio'/ /interface graphics type='vnc' listen='0.0.0.0' port='7837' keymap='fr'/ /devices features acpi/ /features /domain oneadmin@nebula:~$ cat /var/log/one/1937.log Wed Jan 29 15:06:31 2014 [DiM][I]: New VM state is ACTIVE. Wed Jan 29 15:06:32 2014 [LCM][I]: New VM state is PROLOG. Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [LCM][I]: New VM state is BOOT Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [VMM][I]: Generating deployment file: /var/lib/one/vms/1937/deployment.0 Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [VMM][I]: ExitCode: 0 Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: pre. Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [VMM][I]: Command execution fail: cat EOT | /var/tmp/one/vmm/kvm/deploy '/var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/deployment.0' 'igor' 1937 igor Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [VMM][I]: error: Failed to create domain from /var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/deployment.0 Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [VMM][I]: error: Failed to open file '/var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.0': Premission denied Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [VMM][E]: Could not create domain from /var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/deployment.0 Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [VMM][I]: ExitCode: 255 Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [VMM][I]: Failed to execute virtualization driver operation: deploy. Wed Jan 29 15:06:46 2014 [VMM][E]: Error deploying virtual machine: Could not create domain from /var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/deployment.0 Wed Jan 29 15:06:47 2014 [DiM][I]: New VM state is FAILED oneadmin@host:~/datastores/0/1937$ virsh -c qemu:///system create deployment.0 error: Failed to create domain from deployment.0 error: Failed to open file '/var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.0': Permission denied oneadmin@host:~/datastores/0/1937$ ls -l disk.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 oneadmin oneadmin 58 jan. 29 15:06 disk.0 - /var/lib/one/datastores/1/5d2be6f9746fc3447be11c6621da87df oneadmin@host:~/datastores/0/1937$ ls -lL disk.0 -rw-rw 1 oneadmin oneadmin 1357250560 nov. 18 17:42 disk.0 root@host:~# grep -E '^(user|groud|dynamic)' /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf user = oneadmin dynamic_ownership = 0 Footnotes: [1] http://paste.debian.net/plain/78845 [2] http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/2013-February/022168.html -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x7A6FE2DF pgpmX0zLVTBC_.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] libvirt/kvm: Permission denied on PERSISTENT images
Hello, again, The problem is libvirt specific: 2014-01-29 15:10:52.458+: 6566: debug : virStorageFileGetMetadata:1114 : path=/var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.0 format=9 uid=9869 gid=9869 probe=0 2014-01-29 15:10:52.458+: 6566: debug : virStorageFileGetMetadataRecurse:1046 : path=/var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.0 format=9 uid=9869 gid=9869 probe=0 2014-01-29 15:10:52.458+: 6566: debug : virStorageFileIsSharedFSType:1322 : Check if path /var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.0 with FS magic 61267 is shared 2014-01-29 15:10:52.458+: 6566: error : virStorageFileGetMetadataRecurse:1060 : Failed to open file '/var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.0': Permission denied 2014-01-29 15:10:52.458+: 6566: debug : virObjectUnref:256 : OBJECT_UNREF: obj=0x7ffa8b845330 2014-01-29 15:10:52.458+: 6566: debug : virFileClose:90 : Closed fd 42 2014-01-29 15:10:52.458+: 6566: debug : virObjectRef:293 : OBJECT_REF: obj=0x7ffa8b845330 I can do an “md5sum /var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.0”. I'm asking on #virt@OFTC Regards. -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x7A6FE2DF pgpX15odCXFyU.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] [SOLVED] libvirt/kvm: Permission denied on PERSISTENT images
Daniel Dehennin daniel.dehen...@baby-gnu.org writes: Hello, again, The problem is libvirt specific: [...] I can do an “md5sum /var/lib/one//datastores/0/1937/disk.0”. As “oneadmin”, but libvirtd is running as root and new version make some checks on the file, which failed because of a “root_squash”[1] Changing the exportfs parameter solve my issue, sorry for the noises. Footnotes: [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2381 -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x7A6FE2DF pgpd50kyn68N5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] HA hook and -p n flag
Hi Tino, Thanks, yes and sorry for delay. I would like confirm for now that with this change it's works. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Hi Igor, I've opened a ticket [1] to keep track of the solution for next releases. Thanks for the feedback, -Tino [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2689 -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 24 January 2014 12:00, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Dear Igor, This looks like a bug indeed. Could you try changing /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb, line 98, from: monitor_interval = line.split(=).last.to_i if /HOST_MONITORING_INTERVAL/=~line to monitor_interval = line.split(=).last.to_i if /MONITORING_INTERVAL/=~line and try again. If this works, please let us know so we can include a fix for 4.6 Regards, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Igor Laskovy igor.lask...@gmail.com wrote: Is this a bug? If so, please give it High priority. Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 Command execution fail: /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb 9 -r -p 3 Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb:101:in `*': nil can't be coerced into Fixnum (TypeError) Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 from /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb:101 Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 ExitCode: 1 Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: EXECUTE FAILURE 9 error: - -- Igor Laskovy facebook.com/igor.laskovy studiogrizzly.com ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Igor Laskovy facebook.com/igor.laskovy studiogrizzly.com ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] HA hook and -p n flag
Hi Igor, Awesome, thanks a lot for letting us know. Best, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 29 January 2014 16:41, Igor Laskovy igor.lask...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tino, Thanks, yes and sorry for delay. I would like confirm for now that with this change it's works. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Hi Igor, I've opened a ticket [1] to keep track of the solution for next releases. Thanks for the feedback, -Tino [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2689 -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 24 January 2014 12:00, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Dear Igor, This looks like a bug indeed. Could you try changing /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb, line 98, from: monitor_interval = line.split(=).last.to_i if /HOST_MONITORING_INTERVAL/=~line to monitor_interval = line.split(=).last.to_i if /MONITORING_INTERVAL/=~line and try again. If this works, please let us know so we can include a fix for 4.6 Regards, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Igor Laskovy igor.lask...@gmail.com wrote: Is this a bug? If so, please give it High priority. Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 Command execution fail: /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb 9 -r -p 3 Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb:101:in `*': nil can't be coerced into Fixnum (TypeError) Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 from /var/lib/one/remotes//hooks/ft/host_error.rb:101 Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: LOG I 9 ExitCode: 1 Thu Jan 23 18:20:25 2014 [HKM][D]: Message received: EXECUTE FAILURE 9 error: - -- Igor Laskovy facebook.com/igor.laskovy studiogrizzly.com ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Igor Laskovy facebook.com/igor.laskovy studiogrizzly.com ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] IP(v6) network enhancements
Hi Stefan The IPv6 design in OpenNebula is basically designed to work with the auto-configuration features of IPv6. An IPv6 capable host will always have link-local addresses for all their interfaces. AFAIK you cannot disable IPv6 stack per interface. So it really does not make sense to have one interface for IPv4 and other for IPv6, as the IPv4 will also have the link local addreses (plus the host multi-cast address). About the generation of the host-id (the 64 lower bits) can be generated: following the modified EUI-64, based on the IP, or by any other means (usually random generation is accepted as a more secure option). But I see this as part of the guest configuration and probably not for context (although you could generate this through a context variable or using the IPv4 address...) So the ideal setup is to have a router in your virtual network advertising the IPv6 network prefix (e.g. radvd or zebra) and then let the ICMPv6 protocol autoconfigure the interface. The addresses shown in OpenNebula are supposed to match those obtained by the previous procedure (as long as the prefix advertised is the one configured in the vnet). Currently, the only way to add more IP addresses is to add more network interfaces to the VM. Probably a nice feature could be a NIC of type alias or virtual so you get the lease from the vnet, but not an additional nic. The context script can simple ip addr add the IP from the virtual NIC through context. Probably, I am not fully getting your proposal... Cheers Ruben On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Stefan Kooman ste...@bit.nl wrote: Hi List, While deploying some vm's with IPv4/IPv6 (dual stack) support I ran into some issues. I would like to be able to choose (switch on or off) the use of IPv6 in a dual stack vnet, i.e. It's possible to enforce IPv4 address generation in a IPv6 network but it's not possible (as far as I can see) to disable IPv6 in a IPv6/IPv4 network (dual stack as I call it). I would like to avoid having two different vnet's, one for IPv6 and one for IPv4 just to be able to be able to provide vm's with: 1) IPv4 only, 2) IPv6 only, 3) two different interfaces, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6. Of course there are ways to disable IPv6 on the vm itself (just not load ipv6 modules for example) but it would be cleaner to fix this with contextualization. With IPv4 vnet it's possible to choose an ip address. With IPv6 vnet it's automatically generated based on the mac-address. It's currently not possible to choose your IPv6 address. One common practice is to use IPv4 address in IPv6 address. Example: IPv4 192.0.2.33, IPv6 2001:db8:122:344:192:0:2:33 (note this is not truly mapping ipv4 into ipv6, as described in rfc4291). Some vm's need more that one IP(v4/v6) address. For example webservers handling multple SSL websites. Currently I can't create an ip alias for a virtual machine. A workaround would be to hold a lease and manually adding this ip to the vm. It would be nicer to have support for ip aliases. This feature would complement issue #1818 [1]. If some of what I described above is already possible please point me the documentation. Gr. Stefan [1]: http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/1818 -- | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / i...@bit.nl -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlLmWnMACgkQTyGgYdFIOcYP2AD/Y5o9+GTv0U+JO7sJKyz7d9s6 lX16Uc1b2q5O0BfTuFIBAJp9lmu0EXtwXLtgI/ljm3VP8KstnGB+jRo3JivUo6R2 =vBjL -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Ruben S. Montero, PhD Project co-Lead and Chief Architecthttp://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org www.OpenNebula.org | rsmont...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] vif rate xen parameter in opennebula
Hi I've increased the priority for this. There are a couple of issues related to this one (need to add hypervisor features to disks or nics). Probably we will also go for http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2531 There are some modifications to the drivers scheduled for 4.6. We'll try to include these features. Thanks Ruben On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Simon Boulet si...@nostalgeek.com wrote: Hi Kenny, On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:40 AM, kenny.ke...@bol.com.br wrote: Hello. I have a opennebula and xen 4.2 working ok with nfs, but i need to use the parameter rate of vif . With xen, i just to put that in vm.cfg: vif = [ 'rate=10MB/s , mac=00:00:00:00:00:01, bridge=br0']. What i have to put in opennebula template ? This feature is not currently implemented in OpenNebula. See feature # 665: http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/665 Simon ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- -- Ruben S. Montero, PhD Project co-Lead and Chief Architect OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | rsmont...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Closing OpenNebula 4.4 Cycle, Planning for 4.6
Cool, very much appreciated :) On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Hi Shankhadeep, We've evaluated the request and it looks like something that can make it for 4.6. I've opened a ticket to keep track [1]. Regards, -Tino [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2690 -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On 23 January 2014 11:20, Tino Vazquez cvazq...@c12g.com wrote: Hi Shankhadeep, We've already closed the roadmap for 4.6, but please consider open a feature request in dev.opennebula.org and we'll do our best to include it for the next release. Best regards, -Tino -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Shankhadeep Shome shank15...@gmail.com wrote: Could you guys consider pulling in the hyper-v libvirt tag support for sunstone that one of users contributed a patch for few weeks back? Anything that improves Windows guest performance on kvm is very much appreciated, at least by me hyperv relaxed state='on'/ vapic state='on'/ spinlocks state='on' retries='4096'/ /hyperv On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Ruben S. Montero rsmont...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi First, we'd like to thank you all the comments and feedback for OpenNebula 4.6. We really appreciate it :) Our goal for 4.6 is two-fold: improve federation module (aka ozones) and improve OpenNebula usability (based on OpenNebula user comments received during the last releases). It's been always difficult to prioritize the new features considering the limited time-frame of a release, so we tried to balance the effort and number of features. The complete list of features is here [1]. About the specific requests in this thread. In 4.6, We are going for: - #2568 Support for RBD Format 2 images - #1727 Patch for one.image.resize to resize image - #1818 Support for IP reservations along with #2545 Decorrelate networks TYPE and IP management - #1696 Add the ability to select datastore for Clone operation as a previous step for #2417 Move images between datastores. #2417 requires preserving the ID, so let see if we can easily get both - #2453 Add hostname configuration to contexualization - #2048. Instantiate to persistent - #2648: ACL edit/view wizard - #2649: sunstone, occi, econe, novncserver ability to log to syslog server These issues have been moved to the backlog, with a high priority to consider them for 4.8, complete backlog [2]: - oneacct extended to the webinterface. This is issue #1607, in this release we are going for #1484 (output in csv format of accounting data) - over-committing memory (ram) to VMs just like how you can set over commit in CPU. This is issue #1328 - One feature I would like to see would be a recycle bin this has been merge with #2412 Ability to lock VM from accidental actions - #2560 Re-read oned.conf on reload - #2651 Implement mailbox to prevent vm from running twice. Again thanks for the feedback. Cheers PS: A more prosaic form of this mail has been published in the blog [3] [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/projects/opennebula/issues?query_id=45 [2]
[one-users] EC2 / cloud bursting - multiple AWS credentials
Hi, I was reading through Amazon EC2 prerequisites [1] which implies that there can be only one set of AWS credentials per opennebula cloud. Is that correct? This might not be a problem for a private cloud operated by only one organisation / company. For a public cloud that want's to leave room for 3rd party cloud bursting it is a problem. Ideally every user / group should be able to provide his/her own credentials while instantiating/creating a new vm. What is the reason to use a config file for this instead of having this info in a template? Gr. Stefan [1]: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.4/advanced_administration/cloud_bursting/ec2g.html#prerequisites -- | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / i...@bit.nl signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
