[one-users] OpenNebula Conf - Call for Papers started
Dear OpenNebula users, After one long year of waiting, finally the second ever OpenNebula Conference opens its Call for Papers again. Everybody who wants to join as a speaker can now propose a talk via the online form [1]. If you do so, you should definitely reserve a bit of time from December 2nd to 4th and check out flights to Berlin/Germany, because this is when and where cool things will happen. We are looking forward to your talks and will come back to you by the end of CfP on July 15th. Looking forward to meeting you in Berlin, -- The OpenNebula Team [1] http://opennebulaconf.com/papers -- OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the To and cc box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Upgrading from 4.4.0 to 4.6.1
Hi, On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Giancarlo De Filippis gdefilip...@ltbl.it wrote: hi all, i've upgraded a front-end with Centos 6.5 and Opennebula 4.4 via yum update. Thie is output of onedb history: *[oneadmin@manage one]$ onedb history -S localhost -u root -p magialtbl -d opennebula Version: 4.4.0 Timestamp: 01/03 23:22:37 Comment: OpenNebula 4.4.0 daemon bootstrap Version: 4.4.1 Timestamp: 02/07 20:47:08 Comment: Database migrated from 4.4.0 to 4.4.1 (OpenNebula 4.4.1) by onedb command. Version: 4.6.0 Timestamp: 05/23 23:31:34 Comment: Database migrated from 4.4.1 to 4.6.0 (OpenNebula 4.6.0) by onedb command.* But when a try to start one this is the error: *[oneadmin@manage one]$ one start Database version mismatch. Check oned.log. oned failed to start /usr/bin/one: line 117: 5813 Terminated $ONE_SCHEDULER* and this is the oned.log *Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][I]: Log level:3 [0=ERROR,1=WARNING,2=INFO,3=DEBUG] Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][I]: Support for xmlrpc-c 1.31: yes Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][I]: Checking database version. Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][E]: Database version mismatch ( db_versioning). Installed OpenNebula 4.6.1 needs DB version '4.6.0', and existing DB version is '4.4.0'. Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][E]: Use onedb to upgrade DB.* What's the trouble??? Onedb history tell that DB is upgraded I need some help ASAP... Thanks.. How is the DB attribute configured in oned.conf? It should also appear in the oned.log file, the first lines. Regards -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula cmar...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Upgrading from 4.4.0 to 4.6.1
DB=BACKEND=mysql,DB_NAME=opennebula,PASSWD=,PORT=0,SERVER=localhost,USER=x it seems right --- GIANCARLO DE FILIPPIS LTBL S.r.L. Cell. +39 320 8155325 Uff. +39 02 89604424 Fax +39 02 89954500 __ Il 26/05/2014 13:04 Carlos Martín Sánchez ha scritto: Hi, On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Giancarlo De Filippis gdefilip...@ltbl.it wrote: hi all, i've upgraded a front-end with Centos 6.5 and Opennebula 4.4 via yum update. Thie is output of onedb history: [oneadmin@manage one]$ onedb history -S localhost -u root -p magialtbl -d opennebula Version: 4.4.0 Timestamp: 01/03 23:22:37 Comment: OpenNebula 4.4.0 daemon bootstrap Version: 4.4.1 Timestamp: 02/07 20:47:08 Comment: Database migrated from 4.4.0 to 4.4.1 (OpenNebula 4.4.1) by onedb command. Version: 4.6.0 Timestamp: 05/23 23:31:34 Comment: Database migrated from 4.4.1 to 4.6.0 (OpenNebula 4.6.0) by onedb command. But when a try to start one this is the error: [oneadmin@manage one]$ one start Database version mismatch. Check oned.log. oned failed to start /usr/bin/one: line 117: 5813 Terminated $ONE_SCHEDULER and this is the oned.log Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][I]: Log level:3 [0=ERROR,1=WARNING,2=INFO,3=DEBUG] Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][I]: Support for xmlrpc-c 1.31: yes Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][I]: Checking database version. Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][E]: Database version mismatch ( db_versioning). Installed OpenNebula 4.6.1 needs DB version '4.6.0', and existing DB version is '4.4.0'. Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][E]: Use onedb to upgrade DB. What's the trouble??? Onedb history tell that DB is upgraded I need some help ASAP... Thanks.. How is the DB attribute configured in oned.conf? It should also appear in the oned.log file, the first lines. Regards -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org [1] | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula [2] Links: -- [1] http://www.opennebula.org/ [2] http://twitter.com/opennebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Upgrading from 4.4.0 to 4.6.1
... I resolved the issue 1) mysql select * from db_versioning - ; +-+-+++ | oid | version | timestamp | comment | +-+-+++ | 0 | 4.4.0 | 1388787757 | OpenNebula 4.4.0 daemon bootstrap | | 1 | 4.4.1 | 1391802428 | Database migrated from 4.4.0 to 4.4.1 (OpenNebula 4.4.1) by onedb command. | | 2 | 4.6.0 | 1400880694 | Database migrated from 4.4.1 to 4.6.0 (OpenNebula 4.6.0) by onedb command. | I deleted oid 0 and 1. Now everything seems run --- GIANCARLO DE FILIPPIS LTBL S.r.L. Cell. +39 320 8155325 Uff. +39 02 89604424 Fax +39 02 89954500 __ Il 26/05/2014 13:04 Carlos Martín Sánchez ha scritto: Hi, On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Giancarlo De Filippis gdefilip...@ltbl.it wrote: hi all, i've upgraded a front-end with Centos 6.5 and Opennebula 4.4 via yum update. Thie is output of onedb history: [oneadmin@manage one]$ onedb history -S localhost -u root -p magialtbl -d opennebula Version: 4.4.0 Timestamp: 01/03 23:22:37 Comment: OpenNebula 4.4.0 daemon bootstrap Version: 4.4.1 Timestamp: 02/07 20:47:08 Comment: Database migrated from 4.4.0 to 4.4.1 (OpenNebula 4.4.1) by onedb command. Version: 4.6.0 Timestamp: 05/23 23:31:34 Comment: Database migrated from 4.4.1 to 4.6.0 (OpenNebula 4.6.0) by onedb command. But when a try to start one this is the error: [oneadmin@manage one]$ one start Database version mismatch. Check oned.log. oned failed to start /usr/bin/one: line 117: 5813 Terminated $ONE_SCHEDULER and this is the oned.log Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][I]: Log level:3 [0=ERROR,1=WARNING,2=INFO,3=DEBUG] Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][I]: Support for xmlrpc-c 1.31: yes Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][I]: Checking database version. Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][E]: Database version mismatch ( db_versioning). Installed OpenNebula 4.6.1 needs DB version '4.6.0', and existing DB version is '4.4.0'. Sat May 24 00:06:40 2014 [ONE][E]: Use onedb to upgrade DB. What's the trouble??? Onedb history tell that DB is upgraded I need some help ASAP... Thanks.. How is the DB attribute configured in oned.conf? It should also appear in the oned.log file, the first lines. Regards -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org [1] | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula [2] Links: -- [1] http://www.opennebula.org/ [2] http://twitter.com/opennebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] User parameterized template
Hi, On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Daniel Dehennin daniel.dehen...@baby-gnu.org wrote: Hello, Trying to factorize the VM template on ONE 4.6.1 for our internal use, I'm trying to create a user parametric[1] template for network. We have one network topology model and want to ease running their VMs in their own pre-defined networks[2]. I'm trying to define the template with the following NIC definition: NIC=[NETWORK_UNAME=${UNAME},NETWORK=${UNAME}-net] When a user foo instanciate the VM template, I would like ONE to “resolve” the NIC definition to: NIC=[NETWORK_UNAME=foo,NETWORK=foo-net] Is there a way to achive something like this? Regards. Footnotes: [1] like for context http://docs.opennebula.org/4.6/user/references/template.html#context-section [2] not like asked in http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2125 -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF That syntax is only supported inside the CONTEXT section. You can however use the network name only: NIC = [ NETWORK = foo-net ] If you don't provide the network_uname or network_uid, opennebula will look for the network owned by the user instantiating the template. Bear in mind that all users must own a network with the same name, otherwise the deployment will fail. Regards. -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula cmar...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Ubuntu installation on VM
Hi Christope, can you share the template of ubuntu_hdd ? Are you using qcow2? if you are, have you also set the FSTYPE to qcow2 (as well as the DRIVER)? What DEV_PREFIX are you using? Can you try with a larger disk? Cheers, Jaime -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] VM life cycle diagram
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Stefan Kooman ste...@bit.nl wrote: Ah, thanks. In that doc I found a reference to [1]. It gives a complete VM Life Cyle. However it's a .PNG with a too low resolution to be able to read the labels :(. It would be nice if it could be replaced with a SVG version (or a high res. PNG). Thanks. Gr. Stefan [1]: http://docs.opennebula.org/4.6/user/virtual_resource_management/vm_guide_2.html#virtual-machine-life-cycle Yes, it looks like the high res images were lost when we upgraded to the new doc site. We'll fix that [1], but meanwhile you can get the sources from the repo [2]. Regards [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2945 [2] https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/tree/master/share/doc/states -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Windows server 2012 virtio issue
Hi, On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Adam Fyfe adam.fy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone I cannot get a win 2012 vm up and running. each time it just doesnt fnd a hdd. i've tried this: http://moozing.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/windows-7-in-qemukvm/ but no luck. running ON v4.6 TIA!! adam You may find this thread useful: http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/2013-December/025654.html Regards -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula cmar...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Live migration leads to UNKNOWM state
Hi Stefan, Apologies, but I still don't understand if there's a bug here or not. Could you please open a bug report with instructions on how to replicate the issue? Regards, Jaime On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Stefan Ivanov s.iva...@maxtelecom.bgwrote: We have 3 datastores with the following ids: 0 - system 101 - ceph_data 102 - system_mc Live migration happens without a problem when we move the data from the datastore directory to the migration target machine datastore directory before that. *From:* Jaime Melis [mailto:jme...@opennebula.org] *Sent:* 05 май 2014 г. 12:54 ч. *To:* Stefan Ivanov *Cc:* users@lists.opennebula.org *Subject:* Re: [one-users] Live migration leads to UNKNOWM state Hi Stefan, what changes did you make? is this a bug you're reporting? cheers, Jaime On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Ivanov s.iva...@maxtelecom.bg wrote: Hello Jaime Problem is resolved, After little modification of live migrate scripts everything is fine. The problem is that: checkpoint and deployment file not copied to target node. Right now I upgrade to 4.6 and test how is live migration I this version. Thanks and best regards, Stefan Ivanov *From:* Jaime Melis [mailto:jme...@opennebula.org] *Sent:* 30 април 2014 г. 15:50 ч. *To:* Stefan Ivanov *Cc:* users@lists.opennebula.org *Subject:* Re: [one-users] Live migration leads to UNKNOWM state Hi Stefan, can you verify if after a while the vms reverts back to the RUNNING state. Can you also manually confirm that the VM is indeed in the target server (by running virsh -c qemu:///system list) cheers, Jaime On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Stefan Ivanov s.iva...@maxtelecom.bg wrote: I`m running OpenNebula + CEPH + KVM. When I try to make live migration from one host to other everything looks good, no have errors, process is running on right host but Virtual machine go to UNKNOWN state(RUNNING(host1) - MIGRATE - RUNNING(host2) - UNKNOWN(host2)). In vm log I see this: VM running but it was not found. Boot and delete actions available or try to recover it manually, New VM state is UNKNOWN. About my configuration: Ceph datastore: ID 101 Nameceph_data Cluster SunSystem Base path /var/lib/one/datastores/101 Capacity Total 36.4TB Used3.4TB Free33TB Limit - System datastores: system /var/lib/one//datastores/0 SHARED NO TM_MAD ssh TYPESYSTEM_DS system_mc /var/lib/one//datastores/102 SHARED NO TM_MAD ssh TYPESYSTEM_DS VM LOG: Thu Apr 24 12:15:49 2014 [LCM][I]: New VM state is MIGRATE Thu Apr 24 12:15:49 2014 [VMM][I]: Successfully execute transfer manager driver operation: tm_premigrate. Thu Apr 24 12:15:49 2014 [VMM][I]: ExitCode: 0 Thu Apr 24 12:15:49 2014 [VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: pre. Thu Apr 24 12:15:55 2014 [VMM][I]: ExitCode: 0 Thu Apr 24 12:15:55 2014 [VMM][I]: Successfully execute virtualization driver operation: migrate. Thu Apr 24 12:15:55 2014 [VMM][I]: ExitCode: 0 Thu Apr 24 12:15:55 2014 [VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: clean. Thu Apr 24 12:15:55 2014 [VMM][I]: ExitCode: 0 Thu Apr 24 12:15:55 2014 [VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: post. Thu Apr 24 12:15:55 2014 [VMM][I]: Successfully execute transfer manager driver operation: tm_postmigrate. Thu Apr 24 12:15:55 2014 [LCM][I]: New VM state is RUNNING Thu Apr 24 12:16:04 2014 [VMM][I]: VM running but it was not found. Boot and delete actions available or try to recover it manually Thu Apr 24 12:16:04 2014 [LCM][I]: New VM state is UNKNOWN Version of OpenNebula 4.4.1 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in this message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. This message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use, reproduction, or dissemination of this message is strictly prohibited. Any liability arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this e-mail is hereby excluded. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Max Telecom shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication, nor shall it be liable for any delay in its receipt. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] User parameterized template
Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org writes: [...] That syntax is only supported inside the CONTEXT section. You can however use the network name only: NIC = [ NETWORK = foo-net ] If you don't provide the network_uname or network_uid, opennebula will look for the network owned by the user instantiating the template. Bear in mind that all users must own a network with the same name, otherwise the deployment will fail. Great, that's exactly what I was trying to use but the network name is prefixed with the user name. We will make some try. Regards. -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Missing internet connection in the VMs
Hi, Could this be a routing problem? Can you report the output of ip ro from the frontend, hypervisor and vm guest? cheers, Jaime On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Br4ve bendix_harr...@web.de wrote: Sorry I noticed a mistake in the my question. The node and the frontend are connected via eth1 to the internet instead of eth0. Further more I'll give you some information about the virtual network I used: output of onevnet show: VIRTUAL NETWORK 1 INFORMATION ID : 1 NAME : net0 USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin CLUSTER: - TYPE : FIXED BRIDGE : lan0 VLAN : No USED LEASES: 1 PERMISSIONS OWNER : um- GROUP : --- OTHER : --- Best regards 2014-05-12 19:26 GMT+02:00 Br4ve bendix_harr...@web.de: Hi, i got some issues about the connectivity of my VMs to the internet. I'm running Opennebula 4.4 on Ubuntu. I got a node and a frontend, which are both connected to the internet via eth0. My Bridge (lan0) is connected to that interface as well and I'm using the bridge in a fixed virtual network. I'm using the Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Image from the Marketplace, so that it shouldn't be a problem with the image itself I guess!? the brctl show command: bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces lan08000.d4bed9a3d25f no eth1 vnet0 virbr0 8000. yes the bridge part in /etc/network/interfaces is: auto lan0 iface lan0 inet dhcp bridge_ports eth1 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 9 Whats wrong with my setup? Best regards ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] OpenNebula ceph snapshots problem.
Hi Leszek, using Ceph and qcow2 is not something we have leveraged. Maybe someone from the community can report their experiences? I've created a feature report to see if we can add support for this. http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2947 Regards, Jaime On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Leszek Master keks...@gmail.com wrote: I can't migrate to NFS because the disk io performance won't handle my VM's. There isn't any sunstone modification to use rbd v2 images snapshots ? I can create them using rbd snap create, but don't have the possibility to use it via sunstone. 2014-05-14 16:31 GMT+02:00 Vladislav Gorbunov vadi...@gmail.com: Can you write me what i need to do to migrate to qcow2 format? I've got running vm's that cannot be deleted. I tried migrating them form rbd v1 to v2 but this doesn't solved my problem. You need NFS datastore. Only NFS or SSH datastore support qcow2 file format. But Opennebula can't move image between datastores. 1. Shutdown vm 2. Convert from ceph to qcow2 format: export image=vm-disk-1; qemu-img convert -O qcow2 rbd:`oneimage show $image|awk '/^SOURCE/ {print $3}'` /var/lib/one/datastore/123/$image.qcow2 3. Rename ceph image: oneimage rename $image $image.bak 4. Import qcow2 image to NFS datastore with id 123 for example: oneimage create -d nfsdatastorename --name $image --type os --persistent --source /var/lib/one/datastores/123/$image.qcow2 --driver qcow2 --size `rbd info rados/$image|awk '/size/ {print $5*4}'` 5. Start vm 2014-05-14 22:08 GMT+12:00 Leszek Master keks...@gmail.com: Can you write me what i need to do to migrate to qcow2 format? I've got running vm's that cannot be deleted. I tried migrating them form rbd v1 to v2 but this doesn't solved my problem. 2014-04-30 12:41 GMT+02:00 Javier Fontan jfon...@opennebula.org: I'm not sure I follow you with that. Just changing the TM from ceph to qcow2 is something that probably doesn't work. One of the things that can be failing is that getting the free space from ceph and qcow2 is totally different and it may be that the datastore is reporting 0 bytes free. In this case the scheduler will never start a VM that uses that datastore. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Leszek Master keks...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to change rbd image version from 1 to 2 but it doesn't work. But when i changed in my ceph datastore TM_MAD to qcow2 the new VM instantized from image that was in the datastore stuck on PENDING. Is there any way to get this working with existing images? 2014-04-21 14:53 GMT+02:00 Stuart Longland stua...@vrt.com.au: On 17/04/14 01:18, Leszek Master wrote: 1) I'm using OpenNebula 4.4 with ceph datastore. When i try to make snapshot i've got error: 3) Is there any way to use copy-on-write in opennebula 4.4 ? I did some experimental work on this with our OpenNebula 4.4 instance. It relies on modern kernel's ability to map version-2 RBD images using the kernel rbd driver, so it needs kernel 3.10 (? Not sure of exact version; we're using 3.13). This newer format allows copy-on-write cloning. Hot snapshots work, however I haven't managed to trigger a deferred snapshot, so that's untested. The driver also makes use of hypervisor-side cache using FlashCache, allocating slices of a nominated LVM volume to boost performance. I've thrown my work into a git repository for now, consider this very much pre-alpha. If you're brave, feel free to give it a go: git clone git:// git.longlandclan.yi.org/opennebula-ceph-flashcache.git Regards, -- Stuart Longland Systems Engineer _ ___ \ /|_) | T: +61 7 3535 9619 \/ | \ | 38b Douglas StreetF: +61 7 3535 9699 SYSTEMSMilton QLD 4064 http://www.vrt.com.au ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Javier Fontán Muiños Developer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | @OpenNebula | github.com/jfontan ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Public Cloud Guest Isolation
Hi Samuel, In OpenNebula, network isolation relies mostly in VLANs, which may or not use Open vSwitch. In other words, a network is isolated in L2. If you want to connect two L3 networks in the same L2, you will need to add a regular VM acting as a router. If they're sitting on different L2 network, you will need to create GRE-tunnels, VPNs, etc... cheers, Jaime On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Samuel Winchenbach swinc...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, What options do I have for guest network isolation from one group to another? How about guest networks crossing L3 boundaries? I am mostly interested in Open vSwitch implementations. The documentation sees to cover the APIs for Public cloud, but there isn't much on the networking side. Thanks, Sam ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Sunstone Dashboard Real Capcacity Usage
Hi Stefan, On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Stefan Kooman ste...@bit.nl wrote: Quoting Stefan Kooman (ste...@bit.nl): Hi, I'm wondering what the math is behind the Real Capcacity Usage in Sunstone for Virtual Machines. I'm seeing a 29% CPU and 102% Memory as Real Capacity Usage for VM's. The hosts have for CPU: 1790/6400 (28%) Allocated 611/6400 (28%) Real And for Memory: 217.5 GB / 755.8 GB (29%) Allocated 144.9 GB / 755.8 GB (19%) Real I don't understand how the Real Capcacity Usage for Hosts is calculated. I ment to say I don't understand how the Real Capcacity Usage for Virtual Machines is calculated. Gr. Stefan -- | BIT BV http://www.bit.nl/Kamer van Koophandel 09090351 | GPG: 0xD14839C6 +31 318 648 688 / i...@bit.nl The VM real cpu and memory numbers are the values reported for the VM hypervisor process. The same values are used for the individual VM - Capacity graphs, or under virtual machine monitoring in the onevm show output. We will probably change the dashboard for the 4.8, and we may remove these real values, since they can be a bit confusing. Regards -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] creating a template with install cd
Javier Fontan jfon...@opennebula.org writes: Set in ubuntu CDROM the TARGET to hda. The bios should catch it. Also make sure that the cd driver is raw: TARGET=hda DRIVER=raw It's not working here after an upgrade to 4.6, this template was working on 4.4: #+begin_src disk type='file' device='disk' source file='/var/lib/one//datastores/101/65/disk.0'/ target dev='vda'/ driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='writeback' io='native'/ /disk disk type='file' device='cdrom' source file='/var/lib/one//datastores/101/65/disk.1'/ target dev='hda'/ readonly/ driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none'/ /disk disk type='file' device='cdrom' source file='/var/lib/one//datastores/101/65/disk.2'/ target dev='hdb'/ readonly/ driver name='qemu' type='raw'/ /disk #+end_src It could be the qemu backport to 2.0 which makes problem. Regards. -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] creating a template with install cd
Daniel Dehennin daniel.dehen...@baby-gnu.org writes: [...] It could be the qemu backport to 2.0 which makes problem. Or libvirt, forcing OS=[BOOT=cdrom] makes it working. Regards. -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org