Re: [one-users] Fwd: Add New Storage Box

Hi, I don't entirely understand the difference between both options, could you explain in more detail what you mean by distributing the datastore to all the nodes? Assuming your configuration is as follows: NFS Server exports datastores 0 and 1 - Mounted in Frontend + Nodes I recommend the

Re: [one-users] Fwd: Add New Storage Box

Jaime, Thanks for your reply, now datastore 0 and datastore 2 are in existing storage box, mounted in frontend + nodes, we want to move datastore 0 and datastore 2 from existing storage box to frontend + nodes, could it be done? So in existing storage box just have datastore 1 and in new

Re: [one-users] Fwd: Add New Storage Box

Rhesa, the problem is datastore 0, it's the system datastore. If you move it to the local nodes, it will not be shared and synchronized across the nodes, therefore you will lose many benefits like live-migration and instant persintant image VM deployment. Why is it that you want to move

Re: [one-users] Fwd: Add New Storage Box

Datastore 0 and datastore 2 will be synchronized frontend + nodes (we just use persistent image) so i think datastore 0 just synchronized symbolic link. If we have problem maybe existing storage box (datastore 1) broken, all vm used new storage box ( datastore 100) will not impact with

Re: [one-users] CentOS 7 - KVM - OpenNebula 4.8 from Marketplace doesn't start

We are going to convert it to a more compatible version and reupload. Hello, guys. Any progress on that? Thanks. On 08/21/2014 04:23 PM, Javier Fontan wrote: We found a problem with the format of that image. It only works with qemu = 1.10. We are going to convert it to a more compatible

Re: [one-users] Nomadic CentOS repository: WHY?!?

Probably we should have explained these changes more clearly in the release notes. There were two things we wanted to do with the repos: * Have repositories for development versions so it is easier to test * Separate repositories between series so the software is not upgraded accidentally from

[one-users] Latest CentOS Dojo presentations

Dear all, we've just published the talks of the two recent Dojos: http://opennebula.org/aftermath-of-the-latest-centos-dojos-cologne-and-paris/ regards, Jaime -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Opennebula 4.8 Create VM

Hi. I have set the dialog width in the function setupCreateVMDialog of vms-tab.js to 1%: dialog.width(“1%”); With that set, the Create VM window renders OK in Google Chrome on Red Hat (except it is a bit large) and still renders OK in Google Chrome on Windows and in Firefox. I guess this is

[one-users] unable to attach cdrom to VM in opennebula 4.8

Greetings, I am attempting to attach a CDROM image to a running VM via Sunstone but the command fails with the following error: Tue Aug 26 08:52:21 2014 [Z0][VMM][D]: Message received: LOG E 24 attach_disk: Command virsh --connect qemu:///system attach-device one-24

[one-users] Debian Wheezy KVM 2.1

Hey guys, Are there any known issues running Wheezy together with QEMU/ KVM 2.1 from wheezy-backports and ONE 4.8? Thanks for sharing, Arnold -- Arnold Bechtoldt Karlsruhe, Germany 0xE2356889.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[one-users] Opennebula 4.8 proble to upload iso

Hi when I create a template of type cdrom and try to upload dell'immagene iso I get the following error. TTP/1.1 500 Tue Aug 26 20:39:33 2014 [I]: 192.168.2.244 - - [26/Aug/2014 20:39:33] GET /image?timeout=falsecsrftoken=bf59266c40d563bfad0576a92cb00167 HTTP/1.1 401 - 0.0029 Tue Aug 26

Re: [one-users] Debian Wheezy KVM 2.1 (Users Digest, Vol 78, Issue 82)

Hi, We are testing Debian 7 (wheezy) with QEMU/KVM 2.1 and kernel from wheezy-backports. Still not in production. So far no problems (even Windows 2012 R2 works OK). (No ceph support, but it is not problem in our case). Regards, Rolandas P.S. Our testbed is OpenNebula 4.8. On 2014.08.26