[one-users] Dynamic attach CD to VM
Hello, I'm trying to attach a CD to a running VM without success. I saw that IDE hotplug does not work. I found that we can predefine a disk/ without source[1] but it does not seems to work on 4.8. How are you doing to attach CD on running VM? Regards. Footnotes: [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/304 -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6 2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Bulk delete of vCenter VM's leaves stray VM's
The deletion code worked like this:
* Get the list of VMs
* Search the list of a VM with an specific UUID
When several VMs are being deleted it could happen that one VM marked for
deletion is in the list of all VMs but by the time it checks its UUID it is
already deleted. There is another patch for that problem [1] that you can
apply to fix it.
Still, we have made some other changes to deal with VMs and templates in
folders so I think it is better to use the version 4.10.1 that comes with
all these fixes.
Cheers
[1]
http://dev.opennebula.org/projects/opennebula/repository/revisions/e2886255464e666c6a62d91cc1d016da6ab1a643/diff/
On Mon Jan 05 2015 at 12:56:49 PM Sebastiaan Smit b...@echelon.nl wrote:
Hi Javier,
The bug concerning the bulk creation of VM’s works as expected now. Do you
have an idea of what the problem is while bulk deleting vm’s?
Best regards,
Sebastiaan Smit
*Van:* Javier Fontan [mailto:jfon...@opennebula.org]
*Verzonden:* vrijdag 14 november 2014 15:44
*Aan:* Sebastiaan Smit; users@lists.opennebula.org
*Onderwerp:* Re: [one-users] Bulk delete of vCenter VM's leaves stray VM's
There was a bug in the driver that caused error when deploying several VMs
at the same time. To fix it change the file
/var/lib/one/remotes/vmm/vcenter/vcenter_driver.rb at line 120 from this
code:
def find_vm_template(uuid)
vms = @dc.vmFolder.childEntity.grep(RbVmomi::VIM::VirtualMachine)
return vms.find{ |v| v.config.uuid == uuid }
end
to this other one:
def find_vm_template(uuid)
vms = @dc.vmFolder.childEntity.grep(RbVmomi::VIM::VirtualMachine)
return vms.find{ |v| v.config v.config.uuid == uuid }
end
We are still looking into the problem when deleting several VMs.
Thanks for telling us.
On Thu Nov 13 2014 at 12:59:55 PM Javier Fontan jfon...@opennebula.org
wrote:
Hi,
We have opened an issue to track this problem:
http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/3334
Meanwhile you can decrease the number of actions sent changing in
/etc/one/oned.conf the parameter -t (number of threads) for VM driver. For
example:
VM_MAD = [
name = vcenter,
executable = one_vmm_sh,
arguments = -p -t 2 -r 0 vcenter -s sh,
type = xml ]
Cheers
On Wed Nov 12 2014 at 5:40:00 PM Sebastiaan Smit b...@echelon.nl wrote:
Hi list,
We're testing the vCenter functionality in version 4.10 and see some
strange behaviour while doing bulk actions.
Deleting VM's sometimes leave stray VM's on our cluster. We see the
following in de VM log:
Sun Nov 9 15:51:34 2014 [Z0][LCM][I]: New VM state is RUNNING
Wed Nov 12 17:30:36 2014 [Z0][LCM][I]: New VM state is CLEANUP.
Wed Nov 12 17:30:36 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Driver command for 60 cancelled
Wed Nov 12 17:30:36 2014 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is DONE
Wed Nov 12 17:30:41 2014 [Z0][VMM][W]: Ignored: LOG I 60 Command execution
fail: /var/lib/one/remotes/vmm/vcenter/cancel
'423cdcae-b6b3-07c1-def6-96b9f3f4b7b3' 'demo-01' 60 demo-01
Wed Nov 12 17:30:41 2014 [Z0][VMM][W]: Ignored: LOG I 60 Cancel of VM
423cdcae-b6b3-07c1-def6-96b9f3f4b7b3 on host demo-01 failed due to
ManagedObjectNotFound: The object has already been deleted or has not been
completely created
Wed Nov 12 17:30:41 2014 [Z0][VMM][W]: Ignored: LOG I 60 ExitCode: 255
Wed Nov 12 17:30:41 2014 [Z0][VMM][W]: Ignored: LOG I 60 Failed to execute
virtualization driver operation: cancel.
Wed Nov 12 17:30:41 2014 [Z0][VMM][W]: Ignored: LOG I 60 Successfully
execute network driver operation: clean.
Wed Nov 12 17:30:41 2014 [Z0][VMM][W]: Ignored: CLEANUP SUCCESS 60
We see it in a different manner while bulk creating VM's (20+ at a time):
Sun Nov 9 16:01:34 2014 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is ACTIVE.
Sun Nov 9 16:01:34 2014 [Z0][LCM][I]: New VM state is PROLOG.
Sun Nov 9 16:01:34 2014 [Z0][LCM][I]: New VM state is BOOT
Sun Nov 9 16:01:34 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Generating deployment file:
/var/lib/one/vms/81/deployment.0
Sun Nov 9 16:01:34 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver
operation: pre.
Sun Nov 9 16:01:36 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Command execution fail:
/var/lib/one/remotes/vmm/vcenter/deploy '/var/lib/one/vms/81/deployment.0'
'demo-01' 81 demo-01
Sun Nov 9 16:01:36 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Deploy of VM 81 on host demo-01
with /var/lib/one/vms/81/deployment.0 failed due to undefined method
`uuid' for nil:NilClass
Sun Nov 9 16:01:36 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: ExitCode: 255
Sun Nov 9 16:01:36 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Failed to execute virtualization
driver operation: deploy.
Sun Nov 9 16:01:36 2014 [Z0][VMM][E]: Error deploying virtual machine
Sun Nov 9 16:01:36 2014 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is FAILED
Wed Nov 12 17:30:19 2014 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is DONE.
Wed Nov 12 17:30:19 2014 [Z0][LCM][E]: epilog_success_action, VM in a
wrong state
I think these have two different root causes. The cluster is not under
load.
Has anyone
Re: [one-users] Sunstone comes up but nothing happens
Hi Steven, Could you check if there is any error in the browser developer console? Cheers On 31 December 2014 at 22:47, Steven C Timm t...@fnal.gov wrote: I have recently installed and configured sunstone on my open nebula 4.8 installation. I get the login screen and it recognizes me as a user and lets me log in, but only shows the five menu bars at the left of the screen (dashboard, system, virtual resources, infrastructure, one flow). Nothing else after that, and none of those buttons do anything. The browser (firefox) keeps reloading the main page every 5-10 seconds or so. Safari can't bring it up at all. Any common failure mode that might lead to that? In addition, after 20-25 minutes the sunstone daemon just exits for no good reason. (This is an improvement over before when it was exiting after 2-3 minutes.. what got me this far was installing all the required *-devel dependencies.) Steve Timm ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- -- Daniel Molina Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | dmol...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] How to fix status manually from SUSPENDED to RUNNING
Hi, On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Steve @ MyEvolve st...@myevolve.com wrote: Hello List, I did something stupid. I moved data centers and then after exhaustion and not thinking clearly... I dumped the database and did a find/replace to change the IP space after I had manually ssh into each vm and changed. The problem is that the version of the DB I reimported had each vm in suspended mode. Each VM is running correctly. How do I update the db/one to know this without disrupting the running vms? Thanks in advance for any help! Steve The VM state cannot be changed easily. I think the safest way to fix your problem would be to edit the driver to exit 0, and then false-resume your VMs. This can be done with the following steps: - In the front-end, edit the /var/lib/one/remotes/vmm/hypervisor/restore file. - To send the update file to each host, execute ''onehost sync --force. - Then you can run onevm resume on the suspended VMs, and they should move to the running state. - After that, restore the original driver script and use the onehost sync command again. Regards -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula cmar...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] error: internal error: protocol 'gluster' accepts only one host
Most probably you have more than one host defined in the parameter GLUSTER_HOST from the gluster datastore. http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/administration/storage/gluster_ds.html#configuring-glusterfs-datastore Cheers On Wed Dec 31 2014 at 10:44:59 AM hansz hanshizhun...@126.com wrote: hi man today i meet a new question i use centos7 glusterfs 3.5 opennebula 4.10 Wed Dec 31 17:31:26 2014 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is ACTIVE. Wed Dec 31 17:31:26 2014 [Z0][LCM][I]: New VM state is PROLOG. Wed Dec 31 17:31:27 2014 [Z0][LCM][I]: New VM state is BOOT Wed Dec 31 17:31:27 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Generating deployment file: /var/lib/one/vms/37/deployment.0 Wed Dec 31 17:31:28 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: ExitCode: 0 Wed Dec 31 17:31:28 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver operation: pre. Wed Dec 31 17:31:28 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Command execution fail: cat EOT | /var/lib/one/remotes/vmm/kvm/deploy '/var/lib/one//datastores/101/37/deployment.0' '10.24.101.29' 37 10.24.101.29 Wed Dec 31 17:31:28 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: error: Failed to create domain from /var/lib/one//datastores/101/37/deployment.0 Wed Dec 31 17:31:28 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: error: internal error: protocol 'gluster' accepts only one host Wed Dec 31 17:31:28 2014 [Z0][VMM][E]: Could not create domain from /var/lib/one//datastores/101/37/deployment.0 Wed Dec 31 17:31:28 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: ExitCode: 255 Wed Dec 31 17:31:28 2014 [Z0][VMM][I]: Failed to execute virtualization driver operation: deploy. Wed Dec 31 17:31:28 2014 [Z0][VMM][E]: Error deploying virtual machine: Could not create domain from /var/lib/one//datastores/101/37/deployment.0 Wed Dec 31 17:31:28 2014 [Z0][DiM][I]: New VM state is FAILED where is wrong? pls give me some help! ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] How can I allow members of a group to RUN a persistent vm?
Hi, On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Mr Sensible doilooksensi...@gmail.com wrote: So, the question. How can I allow members of a group to RUN a persistent vm? Current Setup OpenNebula 4.10.1 SO I have a VM, that : - is running in an SSH system datastore. - has an image marked as persistent - set to group infAdmins Current permissions - imageUse : NOManage : YESAdmin : YES - networkUse : YESManage : YESAdmin : YES - template Use : YESManage : YESAdmin : YES - vm Use : YESManage : YESAdmin : YES I find that admins in the group can not run this VM. I checked the vm permissions, and yes, group run permission was unchecked. However, I am unable to allow Group Run privilege, as A persistent image cannot be made public. So I am a bit stuck. I need the vm to be persistent (in case of hardware failure) but I need the ssh local system datastore for performance, and I really need a small group other than me to be able to run up VMs, either pre-created by me, or from scratch. I also create VMs for project teams, and need them to be able to run up their own VMs (at the group level). Apologies if I am trying to do something stupid (or missing something obvious). Thanks and seasons greetings Peter This limitation is there for legacy reasons, and because of your mail we have decided to remove it in the next maintenance release [1]. Meanwhile, you can give USE permissions to the group through an ACL rule [2]. In any case, please be aware that a persistent Image can only be used by 1 VM at a time. Best regards. [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/3494 [2] http://docs.opennebula.org/4.10/administration/users_and_groups/manage_acl.html -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula http://twitter.com/opennebula cmar...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
