The only differences I see are in key usage restrictions
The CA that is working in the second example has no key usage restrictions:
X509v3 extensions:
X509v3 Subject Key Identifier:
C4:23:88:A9:1D:CB:82:24:53:E4:61:32:46:15:E0:93:CE:3F:C2:DA
Something seems odd to be about setting up a route (origin 3.9), i can
create a route with re-encrypt if the cert is signed by a self signed CA,
but the route doesn't work if the destination certificate is self signed
and marked as a CA. For example this destination certificate does NOT work
with
You should avoid exporting secrets without being more specific by using a label
selector or by name. This is because you will pick up special secrets related
to that project instance. Loading those special secrets into a new project may
break that project. Similar reason as to why have to be
Hi.
On 02/06/2018 13:18, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
For the basic Python application you wouldn't need to export most of
those and for some doing so would cause problems when you try to load
them again.
For a basic application with no secrets, configmaps or persistent
volumes, all you need is:
