Re: atomic install wants to use /var/lib/containers instead of /var/lib/docker for storage

I'm not sure that is the case. This file is included from [1]. MAybe someone from redhat team could drop some wisdom. [1] https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/blob/release-3.11/roles/container_runtime/tasks/package_docker.yml#L174 -- Mateus Caruccio / Master of Puppets

Re: atomic install wants to use /var/lib/containers instead of /var/lib/docker for storage

There are no symlinks and /var/lib/docker still exists. Looking at the following playbook: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/blob/master/roles/container_runtime/tasks/common/post.yml I can see that the symlink only gets created when using CRI-O with OpenShift (openshift_use_crio).

Re: atomic install wants to use /var/lib/containers instead of /var/lib/docker for storage

There should be a symlink /var/lib/docker pointing to /var/lib/containers/docker. -- Mateus Caruccio / Master of Puppets GetupCloud.com We make the infrastructure invisible Gartner Cool Vendor 2017 Em sex, 25 de jan de 2019 às 11:43, mabi escreveu: > I changed the

Re: atomic install wants to use /var/lib/containers instead of /var/lib/docker for storage

I changed the /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage-setup to use /var/lib/containers instead of /var/lib/docker in the CONTAINER_ROOT_LV_MOUNT_PATH variable and the OpenShift ansible prerequisites.yml playbook now worked fine. So I now I went on to the next step of the installation which is to run the

What is the difference between okd and ocp?

What is the difference between okd and ocp? Is there an intuitive function or component comparison diagram? Thanks. ___ users mailing list users@lists.openshift.redhat.com http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users