Re: OKD 4 - A Modest Proposal

should be addressed in OKD 4.0 so I am really looking forward to trying it out and will make my life as an ops easier. So thank you again so much for the effort. Best regards, Mabi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, June 20, 2019 11:19 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: > TL:DR - I can’t e

Re: Changing master-config.yaml through Ansible hosts file or directly?

> Dale Bewley > > > On Feb 11, 2019, at 04:31, mabi m...@protonmail.ch wrote: > > Hello, > > I installed okd 3.12 using the Ansible playbook deploy_cluster.yml and now > > I was having the following questions regarding configuration changes to the > > cluste

Changing master-config.yaml through Ansible hosts file or directly?

having deployed with Ansible? Regards, Mabi ___ users mailing list users@lists.openshift.redhat.com http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users

Re: atomic install wants to use /var/lib/containers instead of /var/lib/docker for storage

docker.yml#L174 > > -- > Mateus Caruccio / Master of Puppets > GetupCloud.com > We make the infrastructure invisible > Gartner Cool Vendor 2017 > > Em sex, 25 de jan de 2019 às 16:48, mabi escreveu: > >> There are no symlinks and /var/lib/docker still exists. Looking at the

Re: atomic install wants to use /var/lib/containers instead of /var/lib/docker for storage

; /var/lib/containers/docker. > > -- > Mateus Caruccio / Master of Puppets > GetupCloud.com > We make the infrastructure invisible > Gartner Cool Vendor 2017 > > Em sex, 25 de jan de 2019 às 11:43, mabi escreveu: > >> I changed the /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage-setup

Re: atomic install wants to use /var/lib/containers instead of /var/lib/docker for storage

48125/d43adf9eb4cc67bbc8d08f6922ff9fdfcbb1830a8b586f24dfc4afa335a1c51b/layer.tar: no space left on device\" "], "stdout": "", "stdout_lines": []} ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, January 24, 2019 9:40 PM, Mateus Caruccio wrote: > oops, didn

Re: atomic install wants to use /var/lib/containers instead of /var/lib/docker for storage

ub.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/blob/master/roles/container_runtime/defaults/main.yml#L47 > > -- > Mateus Caruccio / Master of Puppets > GetupCloud.com > We make the infrastructure invisible > Gartner Cool Vendor 2017 > > Em qui, 24 de jan de 2019 às 15:52, mabi escrev

atomic install wants to use /var/lib/containers instead of /var/lib/docker for storage

2 driver I followed the following guide: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux_atomic_host/7/html/managing_containers/managing_storage_with_docker_formatted_containers#using_the_overlay_graph_driver Thanks for any hints. Reg

Re: RPMs for 3.11 still missing from the official OpenShift Origin CentOS repo

I would be using Atomic Host? >>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 07:03, mabi wrote: >>> >>>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ >>>> On Saturday, January 5, 2019 3:57 PM, Daniel Comnea >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> [DC]:

Re: RPMs for 3.11 still missing from the official OpenShift Origin CentOS repo

d as everything runs inside Docker containers. Now I first have to figure out how to install my CentOS Atomic Host virtual machines automatically with PXE and kickstart. It looks like I just need to adapt my kickstart file for Atomic Host (rpm ostree) and I get Atomic Host instead of plain

Re: RPMs for 3.11 still missing from the official OpenShift Origin CentOS repo

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, January 5, 2019 3:57 PM, Daniel Comnea wrote: > [DC]: i think you are a bit confused: there are 2 ways to get the rpms from > CentOS yum repo: using the generic repo [1] which will always have the latest > origin release OR [2] where i've

Re: RPMs for 3.11 still missing from the official OpenShift Origin CentOS repo

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, January 5, 2019 10:57 AM, Daniel Comnea wrote: > The specific openshift release directory been present for a long time. > Saying that i'll work next week in pushing v3.11 rpms to > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin/ too

Re: RPMs for 3.11 still missing from the official OpenShift Origin CentOS repo

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, January 4, 2019 11:15 PM, Erik McCormick wrote: > Change it to use: > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin311/ I see, so now there is one directory per version released and not all versions in the same openshift-origin

RPMs for 3.11 still missing from the official OpenShift Origin CentOS repo

-openshift-origin] name=CentOS OpenShift Origin baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-SIG-PaaS Regards, Mabi ___ users mailing list users

Re: Upgrading revision using ansible v3_10/upgrade.yml playbook did not upgrade

Anyone? ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 11:19 AM, mabi wrote: > Hello, > > My v3.10 OpenShift OKD cluster is currently running version > v3.10.0+7af7b71-75 and I wanted to upgrade to the latest v3.10 version which > based on the git log of the op

Upgrading revision using ansible v3_10/upgrade.yml playbook did not upgrade

Hello, My v3.10 OpenShift OKD cluster is currently running version v3.10.0+7af7b71-75 and I wanted to upgrade to the latest v3.10 version which based on the git log of the openshift-ansible repo should be -89. For that purpose I have ran the following playbook from the release-3.10 branch on

The resourceVersion for the provided watch is too old.

Hello, I am running a small OKD 3.10 cluster on CentOS 7.6 and just noticed that the controller-manager on my master node does not seem to start properly as you can see from the "oc get pods" output below: NAMESPACE NAME READY