Re: Pod persistence without replication controller

2018-01-10 Thread Michail Kargakis
+1 on the use of a statefulset - you can still scale up but the new pod should get its own storage StatefulSets provide more consistency guarantees than RCs. On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Joel Pearson wrote: > You could use a StatefulSet if you want a consistent hostname, it would also > ensur

Re: Pod persistence without replication controller

2018-01-09 Thread Joel Pearson
You could use a StatefulSet if you want a consistent hostname, it would also ensure that there is a always one running. On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 at 3:49 am, Feld, Michael (IMS) wrote: > Does anyone know why a standalone pod (without a replication controller) > sometimes persists through a host/node re

Pod persistence without replication controller

2018-01-09 Thread Feld, Michael (IMS)
Does anyone know why a standalone pod (without a replication controller) sometimes persists through a host/node reboot, but not all times (not evacuating first)? We have a database pod that we cannot risk scaling, and want to ensure that it's always running. In