On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 5:24 PM Aleksandar Kostadinov
wrote:
> Ben Parees wrote on 9.08.20 г. 2:38 ч.:
> > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 7:23 AM Aleksandar Kostadinov
> > mailto:akost...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the explanation. While running on 3.11, there is some
> >
Ben Parees wrote on 9.08.20 г. 2:38 ч.:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 7:23 AM Aleksandar Kostadinov
> mailto:akost...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the explanation. While running on 3.11, there is some
> subscription available but is not enough so I need to use custom one.
>
> FYI
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 7:23 AM Aleksandar Kostadinov
wrote:
> Thank you for the explanation. While running on 3.11, there is some
> subscription available but is not enough so I need to use custom one.
>
> FYI I filed a documentation bug for some critical details that could
> have saved me a lot
Thank you for the explanation. While running on 3.11, there is some
subscription available but is not enough so I need to use custom one.
FYI I filed a documentation bug for some critical details that could
have saved me a lot of time [3].
For my use case, because image is not public I decided
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:29 PM Aleksandar Kostadinov
wrote:
> I'm reading documentation [1] but adding the secret mounted under
> `etc-pki-entitlement` directory but subscription manager still doesn't
> find the extra repos.
>
> I don't see 3.11 specific information. Should it work in another
Now I see that later in docs
> COPY ./etc-pki-entitlement /etc/pki/entitlement
> COPY ./rhsm-conf /etc/rhsm
> COPY ./rhsm-ca /etc/rhsm/ca
This is in my opinion inconsistent. We can't use same Dockerfile locally
and in OpenShift. Locally subscription is passed automatically to the
build while
I'm reading documentation [1] but adding the secret mounted under
`etc-pki-entitlement` directory but subscription manager still doesn't
find the extra repos.
I don't see 3.11 specific information. Should it work in another way?
I also see a blog post from this year [2]. It suggests copying
