Toyima,
This is the right list. You just have to take into account that no one
is getting paid to answer your questions in the list. And sometimes
that means waiting a couple days.
Best tactic I've seen to keep putting it in front of people is to
respond to your own thread with a little update of
Hi people,
I think it's good to do a monthly meeting to make the community bigger and
stronger.
Kind regards,
Erik Dekkers (wvds-nl)
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
Namens Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Verzonden:
Hi All,
I want this scenario:
UA - Opensips1 - Opensip2 - PSTN
Opensips2 has a set of subscribers and verifies authentication against a
mysql db, keeps cdrs etc.
Opensips1 has a different set of subscribers with db authentication and
cdrs.
The UA makes a call and is routed from
2011/2/16 Dave Singer dave.sin...@wideideas.com
Toyima,
This is the right list. You just have to take into account that no one
is getting paid to answer your questions in the list. And sometimes
that means waiting a couple days.
Best tactic I've seen to keep putting it in front of people is
Dear all,
I'm thinking about a design of an unified communication system based on
presence status.
I would like to know if the presence status of a subscriber could be
used to define the routing logic.
An example is routing the call to voicemail when Alice's status is
meeting or to a cell
Hi Carlo,
Here are my ideas about this.
One solution would be to insert into usr_preferences table a record with
the URI where the call must be forwarded for the user (you can put the
username in RURI) when the presence status is meeting, holiday, etc.
And delete it when changes into
Hi Carlo,
Such powerful feature would deserve some module of its own. Routing based on
end-user provided preferences using presence is something fresh and cool nobody
has tried it before. Make something that uses published presence and xcap
policy in a meaningful way for the end-user!
We
Juri,
If you are looking to get opensips1 itself to respond to a
proxy_challange of opensips2 your looking at a headache. Any way you
go you'll have to change the way things work to make a special case
for opensips1 on opensips2.
My suggestion would be to, where you are about to do the
Toyima,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Toyima Dias toyim...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/16 Dave Singer dave.sin...@wideideas.com
Toyima,
This is the right list. You just have to take into account that no one
is getting paid to answer your questions in the list. And sometimes
that means
