That's a good news :)
Try to add one patch at a time (incrementally) and let's see when it
starts to crash again.
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 05.10.2016 22:55, Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor) wrote:
Hi
Hi Bogdan,
With 2.2 version, am not seeing any crash. All looks good.
Regards,
Agalya
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ramachandran, Agalya
(Contractor)
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 10:50 AM
To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Sure. I will test and share the results by end of day or tomorrow.
Regards,
Agalya
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bog...@opensips.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 10:47 AM
To: Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor) ;
OpenSIPS users mailling list
Yes, that is ok (without the REST) - just to be sure which patch
introduces the bug.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 05.10.2016 17:45, Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor) wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I have observed one more thing. In the
Hi Bogdan,
I have observed one more thing. In the same source code, when opensips acts as
pure proxy no HTTP call is made opensips is not crashing.
I suspect the crashes may be due to the new async fix provided.
I can do load test in 2.2, but it will be just pure-proxy load test and not
with
Hi Agalya,
That is really weird, as that field (my_T) is initialized (with the
address of the transaction) when the transaction is created (for all the
possible branches) and never reset or set again.
To avoid any regression due the patches you applied, could youplease run
your load test
Hi Rodrigo,
Yes, probably there were TCP contacts left over in location table - and
when OpenSIPS was trying to use them, it was attempting to open a TCP
connection to the IP indicated by the contact (where of course, nobody
was listening).
That is SIP :). Maybe you should try to lower the
Hi Michele,
I find no references in the docs on using "anonymous" as prefix - are
you sure it should work ??
Anyhow, this module is a bit deprecated and poor performance - a simpler
and more efficient way to implement blacklists (prefix based) is via
dynamic routing module (use matching
Hi Miha,
so you have 120M records (NET_ID + DID) - how do you use them from
OpenSIPS ? As I fail to understand what are the operations you want to
perform over this data.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 05.10.2016 09:44, Miha
Hi Miha
I have a similar situation, but around 20 M routes.
The native routing mecanims wasn't performing well, so I developed a custom
mecanism using Opensips scripting. Everything is stored on MySQL database.
The best approach was use avp_db_query to get the route, the primary key
(and index)
Hi all,
i'm trying to block anonymous incoming calls using userblacklist module:
if (!check_user_blacklist("$rU", "$rd", "$fU")) {
xlog("L_ERR","403 - Forbidden - Call blocked from $fU to $rU\n");
sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden");
exit;
}
and in
Hi Alex
i tried, but mysql takes so long time for every select. What do u have
in mind?
tnx
miha
On 05/10/2016 08:46, Alex Balashov wrote:
Why do you believe that using a traditional RDBM necessarily means
slow lookups?
On 10/05/2016 02:44 AM, Miha wrote:
HI
the is not really
Why do you believe that using a traditional RDBM necessarily means slow
lookups?
On 10/05/2016 02:44 AM, Miha wrote:
HI
the is not really opensips issue:) I need somehow to store big amount of
data for routing.
To every telephone operator I must send RURI like
Net_ID+Telephone_number (value
HI
the is not really opensips issue:) I need somehow to store big amount of
data for routing.
To every telephone operator I must send RURI like
Net_ID+Telephone_number (value indicates to who number belongs to). In
this country they have around 120 millions of numbers.
After i have all
14 matches
Mail list logo