Hello! Server:: OpenSIPS (2.2.2 (x86_64/linux)) In the link https://yadi.sk/d/6r2V-d7Y3FBTbV you can find archive with two files:- log of the call;- a part of the cfg file. In the log;1.1.1.1 - caller2.2.2.2 - Opensips3.3.3.3 - callee. The question is, should Opensips, in such situation (have a
There are a lot of philosophical questions around whether OpenSIPS is
obligated to validate SIP requests to the extent that a UAS would,
especially when acting in its normal capacity as a proxy rather than a
UAS.
By one account, its job is to relay requests, not to enforce rules
expressed at the
Hello,
on section 8.1.1 RFC 3261: " A valid SIP request formulated by a UAC
MUST, at a minimum, contain the following header fields: To, From, CSeq,
Call-ID, Max-Forwards,and Via;"
I'm sending to OpenSIPs a SIP INVITE (with SIPSAK) with these headers:
Via, From, To, Call-ID and Cseq
here is another trace
http://pastebin.com/9Ge2NEVQ
I see lot of alloc request but no free.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:57 PM, John Nash wrote:
> Ok will try that. Is it possible that wrong usage of drouting may cause
> this to happen instead of actual leak?... What are the
Ok will try that. Is it possible that wrong usage of drouting may cause
this to happen instead of actual leak?... What are the things private
memory is used for?
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Răzvan Crainea wrote:
> Hi, John!
>
> From the dump you sent, I don't see any
Hi,
I have got hint from ctd.sh script and modified my string as per the string
being used in that script for INVITE. After modification I am getting error
Content-Type missing. The string is now as follows:
message=""":t_uac_dlg:
MESSAGE
sip:212897645@192.168.1.20
.
.
"From:
Hi, John!
From the dump you sent, I don't see any leaks. Perhaps some of those
fragments increase over time. Can you make a memory dump after the
server runs some time, like after it gets 100 messages?
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 03/06/2017
Here is the dump
http://pastebin.com/DTEHF5Vc
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Răzvan Crainea wrote:
> None of the "actions" you are talking about have big impact on private
> memory, but the shared one. Better do the dump and send it over to point
> out what is "eating"
None of the "actions" you are talking about have big impact on private
memory, but the shared one. Better do the dump and send it over to point
out what is "eating" memory.
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 03/06/2017 02:39 PM, John Nash wrote:
with every call attempt it decreases. I tried some changes by rejecting
invite before drouting call (That means after auth , dispatcher) and found
memory is stable but when drouting sends Invite to external gateway and
external gateway rejects it. Then this issue happens.
Inuse transactions and
Hi<
I've tested this on the latest 2.2.3 with the same results.
http://pastebin.com/Uixb3v8G
there were a few of these in the logsd too just before the crash:
Mar 5 22:02:27 gl-sip-03 /usr/sbin/opensips[29875]:
WARNING:core:utimer_ticker: utimer task already scheduled
for 204079170 ms (now
Example :
A (pjsip client )---> Opensips -> B (sipml5)
1. A calls B : working fine .
2. B hold the call : working fine
3. B Resume the call : working fine
4. A hold the call : Not working . While forwarding the call to browser ,
Opensips is not able to do proper conversion .
What should I
Hi All ,
I am useing opensips-2.2.2 with rtpengine and proto_ws module .
I have followd the bellow doc for doing the configuration .
*** http://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Tutorials-WebSocket-2-2
This is working fine in general scenario . But when I am holding the
call
Dear Razvan,
Below is the info on my processes
Process:: ID=0 PID=17351 Type=attendant
Process:: ID=1 PID=17352 Type=MI FIFO
Process:: ID=2 PID=17353 Type=MI Datagram
Process:: ID=3 PID=17354 Type=time_keeper
Process:: ID=4 PID=17355 Type=timer
Process:: ID=5 PID=17356 Type=SIP receiver
Hi, John!
Transactions are stored in shared memory, not in the private one. So the
possible leak you are facing its not related to transactions.
During runtime, OpenSIPS might resize some internal structures, which
may lead to increase memory usage. However, after a while, these
allocations
Hi Folks!
I am trying to generate a MESSAGE packet using t_uac_dlg command from a
management script written in Python. I have tried different combination of
argument string but either getting parsing error or 400 bad headers error.
The string which I am sending to mi_datagram socket in my Python
16 matches
Mail list logo