Hi Saeed,
route[0] is reserved keyword and you cannot (and you should not) invoke
it from other places..
So, more or less, trying to invoke it from DR has not effect as it is
not visible as a normal route try using a different route to be
called by DR.
Regards,
Bogdan
Saeed Akhtar
sorry my bad. I just wrote current values which are working. 0 is the
default value which mean that no route will be initiated directly. I tried
it with routeId 2. and it never invoke route[2]
Regards,
Saeed Akhtar
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@voice-system.ro
OK, let me check it ..
Regards,
Bogdan
Saeed Akhtar wrote:
sorry my bad. I just wrote current values which are working. 0 is the
default value which mean that no route will be initiated directly. I
tried it with routeId 2. and it never invoke route[2]
Regards,
Saeed Akhtar
On
Hi Saeed,
using 1.6 or 1.5 ? also, can you post the rule record ?
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan
Saeed Akhtar wrote:
yes exactly... and im using head revision from svn
Regards,
Saeed Akhtar
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bog...@voice-system.ro
version 1.6.1-notls on ubuntu 9.04
and here is rule record:
ruleid: 1
groupid: 1
prefix: 00
timerec: 20040404T02
priority: 0
routeid: 0
gwlist: 1
description: test1
thats the only rule and working fine other than routeid.
Regards,
Saeed Akhtar
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:33 AM,
Hi Saeed,
so you put 2 in the route_id column for the rules? and this route was
not called when the rule matched?
Also, what version are you using?
Regards,
Bogdan
Saeed Akhtar wrote:
thanks. Basically it wasn't going on route 2, which i told it in
database. I still dont know why was it
yes exactly... and im using head revision from svn
Regards,
Saeed Akhtar
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@voice-system.ro
wrote:
Hi Saeed,
so you put 2 in the route_id column for the rules? and this route was
not called when the rule matched?
Also, what
thanks. Basically it wasn't going on route 2, which i told it in database. I
still dont know why was it happening but still, its working now. Can someone
tell me why it was overriding route column given in database?
Regards,
Saeed Akhtar
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
