ort: UDP
> Sent-by Address: xxx.xxx.xxx.137
> Sent-by port: 5
> Branch: z9hG4bK390a025bb61a5f010a79a7f549f2d743
> RPort: rport
> Server: SIPP
> Content-Length: 0
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: u
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] multiple Via headers separated by comma
Hi Josip,
Post both the BYE (sent out by opesips) and 200 OK (received by
opensips) in plain text .
Regards,
Bogdan
Josip Djuricic wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks very much for your quick answer, I understand that by
list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] multiple Via headers separated by comma
Hi Josip,
Post both the BYE (sent out by opesips) and 200 OK (received by
opensips) in plain text .
Regards,
Bogdan
Josip Djuricic wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks very much for your quick answer, I understand tha
.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Pogrebennyk
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 10:44 AM
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] multiple Via headers separated by comma
>
> Josip Djuricic wrote:
>
>> Transaction is
ssage-
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Pogrebennyk
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 10:44 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] multiple Via headers separated by comma
Josip Djuricic wrote:
> Transact
Josip Djuricic wrote:
> Transaction is not matched if request is sent with 2 or more multiline via
> headers and response is received with via header in one line separated by
> comma?
Josip,
This is absolutely legal if multiple values are combined in one line
separated by comma. Ccheck RFC 3261 f
Hi,
I've noticed one strange thing correct me if I am wrong.
Transaction is not matched if request is sent with 2 or more multiline via
headers and response is received with via header in one line separated by
comma?
Thanks,
Josip
___
Use
