Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] add_path_received and TLS - received address problem

2021-07-22 Thread Mark Allen
Hi Liviu On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 16:45, Liviu Chircu wrote: > > > ERROR:core:unescape_user: invalid hex digit <37> > > ERROR:path:path_rr_callback: failed to unescape > > received=sip:35.x.x.x:60026%%3btransport%%3dtls > > ...Which scenario of the two below would you > say we are in, and with

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] add_path_received and TLS - received address problem

2021-07-21 Thread Liviu Chircu
On 21.07.2021 17:47, Mark Allen wrote: I'm seeing errors for pinger OPTIONS and Asterisk NOTIFY SIP messages going out to the NATed TLS UAC... ERROR:core:unescape_user: invalid hex digit <37> ERROR:path:path_rr_callback: failed to unescape received=sip:35.x.x.x:60026%%3btransport%%3dtls The

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] add_path_received and TLS - received address problem

2021-07-21 Thread Mark Allen
Hi Liviu - thanks for getting back to me. I'm seeing errors for pinger OPTIONS and Asterisk NOTIFY SIP messages going out to the NATed TLS UAC... ERROR:core:unescape_user: invalid hex digit <37> ERROR:path:path_rr_callback: failed to unescape received=sip:35.x.x.x:60026%%3btransport%%3dtls

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] add_path_received and TLS - received address problem

2021-07-21 Thread Liviu Chircu
On 20.07.2021 13:26, Mark Allen wrote: On registration add_path_received() works but the received address is not formatted correctly. I am seeing '%%3b' instead of a semicolon, and '%%3d' instead of an equals sign. Hi Mark, How exactly is this peculiar formatting breaking your logic? 

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] add_path_received and TLS - received address problem

2021-07-20 Thread Mark Allen
Hmm - not sure what went wrong with my post. It seemed to add some unwanted formatting. Here's the failing example again... Path: Path: On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 10:49, Mark Allen wrote: > I'm seeing a strange problem when using add_path_received() for > registration of NATed UAC using