[OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips-cp with Postgres MDB2 Error: unknown error

2017-02-20 Thread Turner, Rick
Hi, I'm using OpenSIPS Control Panel 6.2 with a postgres database and running into some issues I cannot figure out. Hopefully someone can help. When accessing the Users/Alias Management, Users/User Management or trying a search from the System/CDR Viewer screen, I get the error: Failed to

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] yum install vs download manual install

2017-02-20 Thread Nick Altmann
Please look into /etc/sysconfig/opensips . You could find OPTIONS variable, write there -m and -M arguments to control opensips memory size. 2017-02-20 20:09 GMT+03:00 Jeff Wilkie : > If using the yum install on Centos, what's the preferred method to control > the mem size

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] yum install vs download manual install

2017-02-20 Thread Jeff Wilkie
If using the yum install on Centos, what's the preferred method to control the mem size since those files do not appear to be present? Jeff On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > The main different between packages versus tarballs is

[OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPs 2.2.2 warnings

2017-02-20 Thread Ramachandran, Agalya (Contractor)
Hi Bogdan/Razvan, My warnings are not stopped. I see it coming continuously all time. I am not running any load on these OpenSIPS servers. I am using async rest_put in my config file and children process is configured as 24. Even if I try to reduce my children process to 12/8/4, I see this

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] yum install vs download manual install

2017-02-20 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Jeff, The main different between packages versus tarballs is the OS integration : while the tarball gives you OpenSIPS, the pacakges come with additional scripts to help with the OS integration (like the init.d script, some default settings) Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Warning handle_timer_job

2017-02-20 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hello, The tm-utimer is the timer job performing the SIP retransmissions. And OpenSIPS reports an overload of this timer - basically 100ms were not enough for OpenSIPS to finish doing all the needed retransmissions. This is not an error, but an warning telling you that there are too many

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Transactional REGISTER processing with 2.1

2017-02-20 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi Razvan, this is the code from SER 2.0. There is no equivalent for "s:digest_challenge" or "s:contact" AVPs as far as I can tell looking to the code in question in OpenSIPS. -Max On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:25 AM Răzvan Crainea wrote: > Hi, Maxim! > > The code you are

[OpenSIPS-Users] Transactional REGISTER processing with 2.1

2017-02-20 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi guys, We are underway to migrate from ancient SER-2.0.0 to more modern OpenSIPS and one of the question that is still in my TODO list is implementing transactional processing of the REGISTER requests. In the old SER we had something along those lines: route[3] { # Ensure that all

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Transactional REGISTER processing with 2.1

2017-02-20 Thread Maxim Sobolev
P.S. python_exec("www_authenticate") does not do any magic here, it's just figures out the right domain to use based on some business rules and then calls www_authenticate() with that parameter. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hi guys, > > We are

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Transactional REGISTER processing with 2.1

2017-02-20 Thread Răzvan Crainea
Hi, Maxim! The code you are using now should do what you request. t_newtran() returns 0 for retransmissions, therefore for the second message (retransmission) that will run the script, t_newtran() will immediately absorb the message and return without executing any further instructions.