Hello Ben,
Thank you for your advices!
>Четверг, 26 сентября 2019, 21:16 +03:00 от Ben Newlin :
>
>Oleg,
>
>OpenSIPS stores all the changes you make to the INVITE and applies them all
>together right before sending it out. This is to be more efficient. So you
>cannot usually see these
Oleg,
OpenSIPS stores all the changes you make to the INVITE and applies them all
together right before sending it out. This is to be more efficient. So you
cannot usually see these types of changes during processing. This means if you
want to keep using those headers in your script you need
Hi,
You should have it on the OpenSIPS with the 172.25.251.4 IP.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2019
https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2019Amsterdam/
On 9/26/19 6:45 PM, Olle Frimanson wrote:
Hi again
Hello everebody!
My opensips works as proxy. Get INVITE from one side and communicates with a
remote web server via rest. Opensips sends a request to the web server and
receives a lot of custom data, which it converts to SIP X-header. In the end I
get 10 different SIP X-headers
$var(i) =
I think this is helpful?
https://opensips.org/pipermail/users/2016-September/035510.html
james
James Hogbin
Director
IP Sentinel
t. +44 (0)20 3011 4150
m. +44 7786910895
w. https://www.ip-sentinel.com
On 26 Sep 2019, at 16:37, Mark Farmer
mailto:farm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Been looking at
Been looking at this for a while now and it just won't play ball.
I have an avp defined:
# Codecs we do NOT support!
$avp(BadCodec) = "G729";
$avp(BadCodec) = "G729a";
Then I use a for each to remove any instances of the codecs:
for ($var(ToDelete) in $(avp(BadCodec)[*]))
if
Hi Olle,
It is like the double-RR indication is ignored (the r2 param) from the
top Route hdr. Are you sure that the "enable_double_rr" modparam is
still on ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2019
Hi Alexey,
see https://opensips.org/Documentation/Script-CoreParameters-2-4#toc67
I see no reason why not trying to increase the value - at the end this
will probably translate into a larger buffer attached by the kernel to
the listening socket.
So, just give it a try.
Regards,
Hi Sasmita,
Not sure if rtpengine has a similar built-in feature (their doc is
something that can be improved :P), but you can achieve the same from
script level I guess (adding and testing that SDP 'a' line).
Best regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
Hi Anton,
The backtrace looks similar to one from a crash fixed couple of days ago
- get the latest build (nightly packages or latest 3.0 from git) and try
again.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit 2019
Hi Johan,
No, they will not be backported and they are new features, and no new
features are pushed into 3.0, but only fixes.
You can try to grab the 3.1 module and see if it compiles against 3.0 -
if someone asks you, I never suggested anything like this :P.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi ,
I have stumbled on a issue with ACK on 200 OK from Freeswitch. We are
running 2.4.4 but I have also upgraded to 2.4.6 and testad with the same
result.
I get an ACK from our Freeswitch (172.25.0.25), trace from ngrep (some
address and numbers have been anonymized).
U 2019/09/26
Excellent, thank you.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 17:12, Liviu Chircu wrote:
> Hi, Mark!
>
> Thank you for the nice backtrace! I managed to reproduce the crash and
> opened up a GitHub issue for it [1].
> This should bring us one step closer to getting it fixed, so I suggest
> we move the
13 matches
Mail list logo
