Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] drouting probe_mode in active/passive cluster

2020-04-11 Thread Jeff Pyle
Hi Alexey, I see the "dr_enable_probing" MI command; that's great! Is there an equivalent modparam I can add to default to 0, so that it will only probe when we know it has the IP (when enabled by MI)? It will be some time until I'm able to cherry-pick and test. The two proxies are currently

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A behavior of Clusterer module during networking issues

2020-04-11 Thread Donat Zenichev
Hello Liviu! And first of all thank you for your detailed explanation. Now I completely understand the approach was taken when developing this feature of Clusterer. And this looks logical to me. It gives less chances to make a human error. What I did for now, is a clustering super-structure

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] drouting probe_mode in active/passive cluster

2020-04-11 Thread Alexey Vasilyev
Hi Jeff. I made one solution for 2.4. You can cherry-pick https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/05ca54a37d82c605e2cd6d10e5a62fb4f7c35b78 And may be this: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/94a3ede1e276984a91f93f6ece832d174b071ab8 There is documentation in commits. - ---

[OpenSIPS-Users] Topology Hiding and NAT

2020-04-11 Thread Kamlesh .
Hello Team, I have a problem with TOPOLOGY HIDING and NAT issues while using forwarding on busy/no-answer. I fix the NATed contact and then create dialog with topology hiding. The UPSTREAM (callee to caller) BYE relays to private IP instead of public. All the previous requests relay after fixing

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] A behavior of Clusterer module during networking issues

2020-04-11 Thread Liviu Chircu
On 09.04.2020 15:03, Donat Zenichev wrote: I have question and it's almost theoretic. The question relates to Clusterer module and its behavior. Will Clusterer module solve this contradiction on its own? And if so, to which side the precedence is given? The other way around could be to