Dear all,
I am facing scf convergence problem while doing a calculation on a slab
interface by using esm_bc=bc2 .The scf does not converge after 100
iteration .I have given 14 angstrom vacuum in my slab. Here I am providing
my input file details. Kindly correct me if something needs to be changed
Dear Stefano and Pang,
Thank you very much for your advices.
I reduced to 10 atoms, then it converged well. But when I enlarged to 40
atoms, it cannot converge with the same parameters of 10 atoms.
I then made a little change about the lattice parameters:
Sr (0, 0, 0) -->
Dear All.
I would like to know, please, whether it is possible to use DFT+U with U
for d and f orbitals (for example, of Yb) simultaneously.
Thank you,
Juliana Morbec
Postdoc
University of Chicago
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
Dear all,
I have run pw.x (QE v5.02) to find the lattice constant of the bulk
Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 at which Etot is minima. I started with lattice constant
equal to 7.00 a.u and then I gradually increased the lattice constant up to
10.00 a.u without reaching to the minimal energy. For lattice
Thank you for your swift reply.
I tried looking through the input file description, and I did not
understand exactly what I was reading. I was under the impression that
the section titled "Orbital Order" was only for non-spin orbit
calculations. I think my understanding of total angular
Hi Hank,
In the end of projwfc input filediscription you can find enough usefull
information about the order of mi states.
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/wp-content/uploads/Doc/INPUT_PROJWFC.html
Also you should know in the presence of SOC the PDOS is some how more
complicated and spherical
Dear all,
I am trying to compute the entropy change for CNT molecules over a metal
surface. I found online that with the QHA package one can compute the
vibration entropy using FQHA.x. However, I could not find proper
documentation in order to know the input parameters. I was wondering if
someone
Dear Users,
I'm having some difficulty understanding the what the output files from
projwfc.x are actually showing. I've searched through the forum and
couldn't find a very informative answer regarding this question. The
projwfc.x input file documentation is not very helpful either, but
Dear Oliver,
Thanks a lot for your reply. It was annoying me too. But I coludn't find
the source to the problem.
-Aditya
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Oliver Albertini
wrote:
> I saw this binary output when I did not specify the complete path for the
> pseudopotential
I would give a shot to local-TF, mixing-beta not too small (~ 0.3).
is it a metal ? does increasing degauss help ?
is this an instability related to the occupation of the U-projectors ?
does it converge if you if you remove U ?
does the fcc cell with 10 atoms converge ?
stefano
On 09/10/2015
Dear Zhao
The most efficient way is reducing the mixing_beta, you may try 0.1 -0.01 or
even smaller if you can afford the CPU time. Is 50 enough for O? You may check
it, the smallest value usually is given in the PP file. A personal experience
is that do not use semi-core PP. I do not
11 matches
Mail list logo