It is the latest version of QE 6.1. I will double check if I have used the
wrong psedopotential.
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Paolo Giannozzi
wrote:
> QE version?
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shize Yang wrote:
> > I was able to run the
QE version?
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shize Yang wrote:
> I was able to run the examples. But when I started my own calculation. I
> always have this error.
>
> Here are the error messages.
>
> forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
> Image
There is an out-of-bound error. I think I know why, but it is not
something easy to fix
Paolo
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Hongsheng Liu wrote:
> Dear Paolo,
> Oh, got it. Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Hongsheng Liu
>
> 2017-06-15 17:10 GMT+02:00 Paolo Giannozzi
I was able to run the examples. But when I started my own calculation. I
always have this error.
Here are the error messages.
forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
Image PCRoutineLineSource
xspectra.x 00444CAA
Dear Paolo,
Oh, got it. Thank you.
Best regards,
Hongsheng Liu
2017-06-15 17:10 GMT+02:00 Paolo Giannozzi :
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Hongsheng Liu
> wrote:
>
> > I don't think any significant information hidden in the ..
>
> the
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Hongsheng Liu wrote:
> I don't think any significant information hidden in the ..
the following section is called "traceback" and tells you where
exactly the code crashed. Sometimes it allows to quickly fix a problem
(but sometimes
Dear Paolo,
Thank you for your answer. Now I paste the whole error message and the
input file. But I don't think any significant information hidden in the
..After submitting the job, I watched the memory used all the time, the
maximum memory used is about half of the maximum in the server.
Hello Everyone
I have calculated the ground state energy of Sodium Atom. The final result
is -92.3063689424Ry. I have use below input file. Is it correct?
calculation='relax',
verbosity='high'
prefix='sodiumrelax'
outdir='/home/quantumespresso/Downloads/graphene/adsorption'
Dear all,
I am writing you because (together with a colleague of mine Andrea
Pedrielli) we are experiencing errors in the last step (gww.x) of a GW
calculation on graphene with the code GWL. QE version is 6.1
In particular, with different choices of parameters for the polarization
basis and
Dear Quantum ESPRESSO’s users and developers,
I have released the new version of BURAI (ver.1.2).
You can download executables of Windows and Mac OSX from
https://github.com/BURAI-team/burai/releases/tag/ver.1.2 .
Features:
- You can see and create movies of geometry optimization or molecular
Hello everyone
I am getting an error ortho went bananas while running the following
code. As it was discussed in various pw forums we can get rid of this
problem by reducing dt or increasing ortho_max. But none of them helped.
Any small hint or help is welcomed.
Thanks
Kartikeya Dixit
Ph.D
Dear all,
I am new to qe and want to learn to generate pseudopotential on my own.
Can you suggest why do they put negative signs in the configuration of Si
in Does that have any significance of an atom in solid.?( I am
just curious to know)
Also,
How can I choose more ionic configurations.
Thank for you reply.
From the experimental results, bulk are semi-metal.
Other DFT method with HSE show the band gap of monolayer is 2.0eV.
When I use PBE functional, the gap is 1.6eV which is agreed well with other
calculation with PBE method.
Best regards,
Clarence
First check the band-structure in bulk case. The smaller band-gap may be
due to appearance of surface states in band-gap region.
- Original Message -
From: "LEUNG Clarence"
To: "pw forum"
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:55:03 PM
Subject:
Dear All,
Now, I want to use HSE functional to calculate the band structure of monolayer
arsenic, but the band gap is much smaller than previous report (2eV).
I have try to change some parameters. But the results are not good.
EXX= 0.25, ecutwfc=30, gap=1.15eV,
EXX=0.35, ecutwfc=30,
Hello Everyone
I have calculated the ground state energy of Sodium Atom. The final result
is -92.3063689424Ry. I have use below input file. Is it correct?
calculation='relax',
verbosity='high'
prefix='sodiumrelax'
outdir='/home/quantumespresso/Downloads/graphene/adsorption'
16 matches
Mail list logo