[Pw_forum] How to ascertain simulation completion

2017-08-02 Thread Rajesh
Dear Users How can I ascertain that my simulation is completed (vc-relax)? I have set energy convergence criterion to 1*e-6. But after looking at energy values it doesn't seem to be achieved yet my simulation is completed without any error message. Any help will be appreciated. number of scf cycl

Re: [Pw_forum] Format problem in projwfc.x?

2017-08-02 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
There is a bug (fixed yesterday): add %m to the last occurrence of "nlmchi(nwf)". Paolo Il 02/ago/2017 10:30 PM, "Reinaldo Pis Diez" ha scritto: Dear folks I'm running a series of jobs to get the total and partial DOS of TiO2-based systems. I'm using QE-6.1 under CentOS 6, compiled with gfortra

[Pw_forum] Format problem in projwfc.x?

2017-08-02 Thread Reinaldo Pis Diez
Dear folks I'm running a series of jobs to get the total and partial DOS of TiO2-based systems. I'm using QE-6.1 under CentOS 6, compiled with gfortran and blas+lapack+atlas+openmpi from rpm files. Both geometry + lattice relaxation and nscf jobs ends without any problem, but when I run projwf

Re: [Pw_forum] How to get absorption coefficient

2017-08-02 Thread Timrov Iurii
Dear Liang, > From the results, there are two parts in chi_1_1. (real part and imaginary > part) . No adsorption coefficients Spell correctly: "aBsorption coefficient". Multiply the imaginary part of chi_1_1 by the frequency and plot it. > How can we calculate the adsorption coefficients f

[Pw_forum] Compiling QE-6.0 on IOLENGTH=4 machine

2017-08-02 Thread Vahid Askarpour
Dear QE Users, I have compiled QE-6.0 on a linux machine with intel-2016.4.258. The IOLENGTH on this machine is 4. So I changed the DIRECT_IO_FACTOR in the /Modules/io_files.f90 from 8 to 4. However, a simple self-consistent run crashed with the following error: from davcio : error #

Re: [Pw_forum] Re%3A Relax keeping orthogonality&In-Reply-To=

2017-08-02 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
Well, if all you want to do is change the volume of the cell, keeping the shape constant you are basically changing celldm(1), aka alat. A single-parameter minimization can easily be done by hand: compute a few values in a +/-5% of where you thin the minimum would be and fit the energy with a parab

Re: [Pw_forum] valence configuration of Co psp

2017-08-02 Thread 毛飞
Thank you for you instructions, Marton, I have got the corret Co psp for the valence configuration. Regards. Evan 在2017-08-02,Marton 写道: -原始邮件- 发件人: Marton 发送时间: 2017年8月2日 星期三 收件人: PWSCF Forum 主题: Re: [Pw_forum] valence configuration of Co psp Hi Evan, You can find FHI pseudos here:

Re: [Pw_forum] computing different energies (dispersion/electron attraction/repulsion/polarization) from total QE energy

2017-08-02 Thread Evren Ataman
Hello Gangotri I can answer one of your questions. If you use DFT-D2 (I do not have experience with DFT-D3, but assume it is similar) add on in QE to include the dispersion interaction then you can calculate the contribution of dispersion interaction to adsorption (binding) energy. What you need t

[Pw_forum] Re%3A Relax keeping orthogonality&In-Reply-To=

2017-08-02 Thread elchatz
Hello Lorenzo, Are you sure this works for all Bravais lattice types? Because I am getting the following error: task #24 from cell_dofree : error # 1 Isotropic expansion is