Thank you very much! By changing the order, the code finally runs!
All the best,
Sky
--
Jianqiang (Sky) ZHOU
European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility
Institut des NanoSciences de Paris (INSP)
Dear all,Does anyone have tried to used Jiang, Levchenko and Rappe’s method to calculate oxidation state of atoms? (Phys. Rev Letters, 108, 2012, 166403.In brief, the formula is N=V/e \Delta(P) x R /R^2,where N, V, e, \Delta(P) and R are the oxidation state, cell volume, electron charge, change
I often see exactly this error when the number of MPI processes used is
close to or greater than nr3 of the FFT grid. In those cases, dividing up
the MPI via -ntg or using a mixture of MPI & OMP to get the MPI count down
is often helpful for me.
Best
Kirk
ECE Department
Boston University
On
The order is different and there is Hubbard_U(1) set in both inputs. In one case refering to to Ti d orbitals in the other case it is refering to Se; for which the program should actually stop, because it is not no l is defined and the program sets l the index to -1.The program is possibly writing
The order of atom types is not the same (which is not without consequences
in a DFT+U calculation).
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Zhou Jianqiang
wrote:
> Dear Paolo,
>
>
> I really did not find anything else different... Here I attach the result
> from a vimdiff.
>
>
Hello
Can you please provide more details, like which pseudopotentials you are
using, and also the ATOMIC POSITIONS?
Thank you
Manjusha
Postdoctoral Researcher
Department of Chemistry
University of Paderborn, Germany
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Zhou Jianqiang
The error you get cannot come from ibrav, a, c, cell_parameter. Please do
a "diff" of the two inputs and you will find something else.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Zhou Jianqiang
wrote:
> Dear Developers,
>
>
> I have a problem when setting ibrav = 0. I did two
Dear Developers,
I have a problem when setting ibrav = 0. I did two tests and the only
differences between the two are:
1.
ibrav= 4,
celldm(1)=6.6893,
celldm(3)=1.697,
2.
ibrav = 0,
A = 3.53600 ,
CELL_PARAMETERS {alat}
0.866025403784439 -0.500
The phonon code supports nonlocal vdW XC (e.g. vdw-DF) and DFT-D2 (Grimme);
does not support Tkatchenko-Scheffler, XDM, DFT-D3
Paolo
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Robert Wexler
wrote:
> Dear Lorenzo,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Which version would that be? I was
Dear Hari,
There is no automatic way to do it, it quite simple in practice: you can do
it alat byte level, or from fortran. If your final file size is N bytes and
you have M modes you take the first N/M bytes from the node that computed
the first mode, and so on. The final file size is the size of
Hi,
Thanks all for the response. I tried to run Will DeBenedetti's script for his
anatase (001) slab and the calculation runs without an error (on 4 nodes and 20
cores per node). I don't understand though why his script does run and mine
does not. Does anybody has an idea about this?
I also
On 02/26/2018 12:01 AM, Robert Wexler wrote:
> Which version would that be?
I've checked the current development version, but honestly only the
comment at the beginning of phonon.f90, it claims to support DFT-D2, I
would guess that WDV-TS would come with it, but either I'm wrong or the
check
12 matches
Mail list logo