Re: [QE-users] Error in routine latgen (13): wrong celldm(3)

2020-05-17 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:23 PM Mauro Sgroi wrote: > Checking the output of ph.x I found that the celldm parameters are changed > with respect to the initial scf calculation (and also the number of atoms > in the cell pass from 24 to 30). > With your input and the latest development version,

Re: [QE-users] (no subject)

2020-05-17 Thread Malathe Khalil
Dear Fabrizio I want to calculate the adsorption energy of a molecule on a surface. So I need the total energy of the clean slab. Can I just take the total energy from relax calculations output or I have to run scf ? Thanks Malathe On Sun, 17 May 2020, 6:04 pm Fabrizio Cossu, wrote: > > > On

Re: [QE-users] Error in routine latgen (13): wrong celldm(3)

2020-05-17 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
Hello Pietro, could it be related to this closed issue ? https://gitlab.com/QEF/q-e/-/issues/169 cheers On 5/16/20 10:24 PM, Mauro Sgroi wrote: I forgot to mention that I'm using version 6.5. Best regards, Mauro. Il giorno sab 16 mag 2020 alle ore 22:22 Mauro Sgroi

Re: [QE-users] (no subject)

2020-05-17 Thread Fabrizio Cossu
On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 22:19, Malathe Khalil wrote: > Dear QE users > What is the difference between the total energy generated by relax > calculations and scf calculations? > A structural relaxation is a scf calculation. Perhaps you mean a fixed point scf calculation, i.e. without updating the

[QE-users] (no subject)

2020-05-17 Thread Malathe Khalil
Dear QE users What is the difference between the total energy generated by relax calculations and scf calculations? When I do relax calculations do I need to do scf calculations also? Thanks Malathe ___ Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX