[QE-users] Core electron energy

2020-06-11 Thread Vahid Askarpour
Dear QE Users, Is it possible to output the core electron energy with QE? I am hoping to use the core energy as a reference for electronic band shifts as a result of atomic displacement. Thank you, Vahid Vahid Askarpour Department of physics and atmospheric science Dalhousie University Halifa

Re: [QE-users] Is superconducting Tc dependent on matdyn input?

2020-06-11 Thread Fabio Costa
Dear Lucas The inputs nk1, nk2, nk3 and ndos are relevant to the phonon DOS calculation. As you saw in your tests, these inputs do not seem to affect the calculates critical temperatures. I also observed the same outcome in my calculations. I'm not an expert, and hopefully, someone from the dev

Re: [QE-users] Error in routine latgen (13): wrong celldm(3)

2020-06-11 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
Thank you, will be fixed - Paolo On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:55 AM Mauro Sgroi wrote: > Dear Paolo, > I tested the patch. > Now it works fine. Apart from the fact that in the dynamical matrix file > there is a missing space between the number of atoms and the ibrav. > > Dynamical matrix file > No

[QE-users] Is superconducting Tc dependent on matdyn input?

2020-06-11 Thread Lucas Francisco
Greetings While performing some tests on calculating superconducting Tc via interpolation using PHonon, I noticed that my final Tc results seemed independent from inputs of matdyn.x (nk1, nk2, nk3 and ndos). Is this behaviour expected? How can it be that the Tc results do not depend on how dens

[QE-users] band.x could not find the symmetry from the k path generated by Xcrysden 1.6.2

2020-06-11 Thread liuyang
Hello everyone, I'm a new user of QE-6.5. and I'm following the first tutorials on QE official website (https://gitlab.com/QEF/material-for-ljubljana-qe-summer-school). In the 2nd example of Day 1 training, the band structure of graphene should be calculated from the given input files: pw.gra

Re: [QE-users] Error in routine latgen (13): wrong celldm(3)

2020-06-11 Thread Mauro Sgroi
Dear Paolo, I tested the patch. Now it works fine. Apart from the fact that in the dynamical matrix file there is a missing space between the number of atoms and the ibrav. Dynamical matrix file Normal modes for LTS 3 24-13 11.6858807 1.7310209 1.9612353 0.000 -0.1716636 0.000