Re: [QE-users] supercell

2020-07-05 Thread Yue-Wen Fang
This error info. has already told you how to fix this problem: ibrav=0: must read cell parameters So you must use CELL PARAMETERS in the input file. Neelam Swarnkar 于2020年7月4日周六 下午9:33写道: > Thanks for reply Yue-Wen > > I used the supercell 001 file to further calculation of SCF. in QE-6.3 > >

Re: [QE-users] Gamma Point

2020-07-05 Thread Felipe Toledo Carrasco
Thanks for your answer. Regards El jue., 2 jul. 2020 a las 2:51, Lorenzo Paulatto () escribió: > Hello Felipe, > > K_POINTS (gamma)? > > This syntax is betterm because the code will use the property of the > Gamma-point to use real-valued wavefunctions, saving half the memory and > the time

Re: [QE-users] pseudopotentials up to Z=118 ?

2020-07-05 Thread Malte Sachs
Dear all, I am creating US-PPs and PAWs with the atomic code of QE at least for all the actinides at the moment. I hope the project will be finished by the end of the year and will result in a publication :). Best regards, Malte Am 05.07.20 um 16:35 schrieb Lorenzo Paulatto: Hello, you

Re: [QE-users] Sum rule violation - turbo_eels

2020-07-05 Thread Oleksandr Motornyi
Dear Anibal What kind of NC/USPP have you used? For gold, i.e. how many valence electrons? Also, did you use a wide energy range in turbo_spectrum? As far as I remember you might want to go up to 150-200 eV (if not more for some cases) to be converged with respect to sum rule. Best

Re: [QE-users] pseudopotentials up to Z=118 ?

2020-07-05 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
Hello, you can find some pseudopotentials for some heavier elements by selecting another library in the left column of the web page. A part from that, building pseudpotentials for these heavy elements is a very difficult task. I doubt that anybody will tackle it (especially for the

Re: [QE-users] Problem implementing Exact exchange part in HSE calculation

2020-07-05 Thread Michal Krompiec
Dear Nawaf, You may be running out of memory. Try setting ecutfock=ecutwfc (or, at most, 2*ecutwfc). Best, Michal Krompiec Merck On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 11:58 AM Nawaf A wrote: > Dear QE users. > I am trying to do an HSE calculation of 47 atoms (with 1 defect) > calculation, but the calculations

[QE-users] Problem implementing Exact exchange part in HSE calculation

2020-07-05 Thread Nawaf A
Dear QE users. I am trying to do an HSE calculation of 47 atoms (with 1 defect) calculation, but the calculations stop after the PBE calculation. The calculations run through the entire allotted time without printing any output for the ACE calculation, I think the ACE calculation is not getting

[QE-users] magnetic dipole matrix

2020-07-05 Thread Wang, Xiaoming
Dear all, I would like to evaluate the magnetic dipole matrix L_mn = < m | L | n > using QE. Relevant routines are in orbm_kubo.f90 which implements the orbital magnetization \sum_n < n | L | n > using the berry phase method (Phys. Rev. B 74, 024408). I managed to modify the code to print out